Half naked women in avatars/signatures

jender said:
Why - does my sig have random boobs in it?

I said nothing about using sexual comments for comedy.

And any of the pictures of scantily clad women I have ever posted, have been of myself.

I reserve the right to demean myself for comedic value. That is all.
Click to expand...

So where can I find these pics? :rolleyes:
 
Eilistrae, I'm just messing with ya! I agree that pornography has no place here on a message board, about a video game. However, I still haven't seen anything too revealing on here. (If someone has, please PM the pics to me.)
As far as children go, the language is far worse than any image I have seen here. If they start not allowing "PG-13" pics then they would also have to censor the (at sometimes) "X-Rated" adult language.

Besides, a child that has access to the internet unsupervised, can and will get some much more graphical images elsewhere.
 
I take it back... Answa has just crossed the line. Can someone ban Answa?
 
I'm just gonna add Answa to my ignore list now, g'bye >_>
 
Raivyn said:
If you've never seen a victoria's secret ad more suggestive than that then you must have never been to a mall or even receive their mailer.

Nudity is one thing, suggestive nudity is another.

Example: While I was living in germany I saw one add of a naked woman resting her head on another naked woman's nicely rounded bare ass. The add was for toilet paper.

The other day I was walking through the mall and I saw a 20 foot picture of a lingerie clad busty babe with her hair flowing, sultry eyeliner, thong panties - nowhere near as naked as the aforementioned ad - with this "I will F your brains out" look on her face and her body all contorted into some sexy and provocative pose.

Of those two - the latter is the one that would give 9/10 heterosexual men an erection, but there is far less nudity.

Likewise - placing a picture of a asian girl dancing about with an ipod and have 50% of her breasts exposed is nowhere near as suggestive as a comment about oral sex. I'm not lashing out - I just find it odd that someone would say "Those who place half nude people in their sig are desperate losers" yet have a remark made towards them vividly referencing oral sex. Which is more offensive? Mine could easily be an underwear or ipod ad (granted only in europe) - yours is arguably triple X.



Actually yeah I'd say so - it's kind hypocritical.

Question: If I was a woman would you have any problem with my former signature?

(PS: I'm not trying to cut you down at all, I've spoken with you before and I find you quite nice and genuine :D, I'm just having some friendly debate)
Click to expand...



You are a real jackass. And - yeah, I order regularly from the Victoria's Secret catalog, show I have seen it. They are far more tastefully done than body parts bobbing in and out of clothing.

And Guess what - a majority of us aren't in Europe.

If Sculli ever asked me to tone down my remarks for the younger kids on this site, I'd probably do it w/o throwing a hissy fit.

Also - being sexual yet not resorting to semi-porn pics on a website doesn't exactly make me a hypocrit. Just because one enjoys talking about things doesn't mean they are all about hopping down to the nearest strip joint to demean strangers. I don't feel that anything that I say about sexual acts demeans women - if you do, than I apologize.
 
You boys just don't understand. Mainly I think because you don't have daughters "yet". You just wait. If someday you see a pic similar to Pokomen's and it's YOUR child you're looking at, whether she's 18 or not, y'all are gonna be singin' a WAYYYYY different tune.

<3 Jender and the head on her shoulders.
 
Kat said:
You boys just don't understand. Mainly I think because you don't have daughters "yet". You just wait. If someday you see a pic similar to Pokomen's and it's YOUR child you're looking at, whether she's 18 or not, y'all are gonna be singin' a WAYYYYY different tune.

<3 Jender and the head on her shoulders.
Click to expand...

I completely understand that - what I don't understand how this

http://www2.victoriassecret.com/col...3&cgname=osptysxyzzz&cgnbr=osptysxyzzz&page=3

or this

"I ordered you on a mug, I'm gonna be sipping fluids out of you every morning for quite some time"

is better, not worse, than what I had in my sig.

Oh and somehow that makes me a desperate loser with no life to speak of.
 
Raivyn that is a womens catalog selling lingerie. This is an FFXI gaming forum.

What does one have to do with the other?
 
"El que se pica es porque ají come" is a proverb here, it means you only get mad if it actually applies to you. Nobody said you were a desperate loser. If it hadn't been a .gif, you'd been able to keep it. You have your own opinion, so do they. Live with it, all of you. We're not supposed to agree on everything, but that doesn't mean we have to fight about it.
 
To those of you who are fearful of getting caught at school or work. Well... why are you browsing the forums at school/work? If you're bored, take a gameboy or something, GOSH!
 
Kat said:
Raivyn that is a womens catalog selling lingerie. This is an FFXI gaming forum.

What does one have to do with the other?
Click to expand...

Those images are readily available to everyone (ages 0 on up) waltzing in the malls of america - areas which have FAR more young people and families than this community.

Oh and because none of this is at all objectifying.

http://www2.victoriassecret.com/com...F-192138&page=4&cgname=OSSLPPJSZZZ&rfnbr=1721

http://www2.victoriassecret.com/col...1&cgname=OSSLPPJSZZZ&cgnbr=OSSLPPJSZZZ&page=3

I'm sorry but inviting people into your "pink love cabin" is far more objectifying than a cute model dancing.

Also - this is an online gaming forum, but jender's sig is acceptable? Please explain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top