How to make a zero-content post!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tyrion

Artifact Armor
Adventurer
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
999
Location
Mt. Pleasant, MI
Website
www.livejournal.com
Cubswoo thinks that censorship could benefit us. Unfortunately for him, he's wrong. By way of introduction, let me just say that on several occasions I have heard him state that he can scare us by using big words like "anthrohopobiological". I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that Cubswoo expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Cubswoo uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. Well, let's get our facts straight. I claim that Cubswoo needs to internalize the external truth that if a new Dark Age is about to descend upon us -- as many believe it will -- it will be the result of his assertions. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that the basal lie that underlies all of his illaudable intimations is that women are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. Translation: Cubswoo's philippics epitomize wholesome family entertainment. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that it's our responsibility to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence. That's the first step in trying to remind him about the concept of truth in advertising, and it's the only way to establish clear, justifiable definitions of emotionalism and neocolonialism so that you can defend a decision to take action when his worshippers incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state.

We can say that my task -- our task -- is to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in Cubswoo's orations, and Cubswoo can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. He recently claimed that he can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before. Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, his hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.

Life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Cubswoo so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is undoubtedly not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that Cubswoo thinks that I'm too chauvinistic to embark on a new path towards change. However, I will not let myself be forced into anything. I am not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that he has come very, very close to making me hang myself by the neck until dead. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that I've known some gasbags who were impressively unctuous. However, Cubswoo is bad-tempered, and that trumps unctuous every time. It is hardly surprising that Cubswoo wants to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. After all, this is the same jaundiced backbiter whose callous prattle informed us that human life is expendable. Some people are responsible and others are not. Cubswoo falls into the category of "not". Whenever someone tells him not to inaugurate an era of superficial isolationism, Cubswoo gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him, it really does. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that granting Cubswoo complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. Now you know that it's about time the public realized that they are being hornswoggled by Cubswoo and his apologists.

http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
 
err what that guy said plz use simple words as i am not s m r t i mean s m a r t
 
I feel obligated to say something about Square Enix, because, as the Talmud says, "Silence is akin to assent." For the sake of review, an armed revolt against Square Enix is morally justified. However, I feel that it is not yet strategically justified. Ladies and gentlemen, I like to speak of Square Enix as "incompetent". That's a reasonable term to use, I suspect, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, its grand plan is to fan the flames of narcissism into a planet-spanning inferno. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, if Square Enix were as bright as it thinks it is, it'd know that it just reported that it's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Square Enix's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a bloody-minded, conniving vat of racism. While I know very little about narrow-minded slanderers, I do know that Square Enix's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, it tells so many lies, it's bound to trip itself up someday. I know the following is a cheap shot, but the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to appeal for comity between us and Square Enix, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I sure hope not, but then again, Square Enix argues that I am nerdy for wanting to create and nurture a true spirit of community. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that the older Square Enix gets, the more unctuous it becomes.


Somehow close...
 
To respond to all of Rones's proposed social programs would take up too much room and time. I would like to address the most heartless ones, though. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, the only weapons Rones has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Some people aver that I am morally and ethically opposed to Rones's maneuvers. Others feel that Rones's hariolations are often disregarded merely as shameless and are consequently not treated as the serious assaults on liberty and freedom that they doubtlessly are. In the interest of clearing up the confusion, I'll make the following observation: If we can understand what has caused the current plague of aberrant cockalorums, I believe that we can then put the kibosh on Rones's put-downs.

Rones is the ultimate source of alienation and repression around here. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says amateurish things. That's just not true. He approximates a materialistic braggadocio as far as practical action is concerned but differs in psychology, ideology and motivation, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Let's look at the facts. First, each liberated mind that examines all of the evidence is a break in the chains that bind us all. Second, the only winners in Rones's games are ambulance services and funeral homes. And finally, Rones's more than irascible. He's mega-irascible. In fact, to understand just how irascible Rones is, you first need to realize that he thinks that his causeries are our final line of defense against tyrrany. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so. Let me end by citing my standard hate-mail response form letter:

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. One question, though: Do you actually want Rones to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate? Because that's what'll happen if we don't stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values.


Lol, this thing is so awesome
 
Saw this posted on Alla like... months ago.

Still fun to use though. Now every flameboard moron can sound teh sm4rt.
 
I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I unquestionably don't want to start an argument, but Lord Kaiba III's clear-cut demonstrations of gross moral turpitude have led me to believe that Lord Kaiba's detractors are correct in their observation that Lord Kaiba tries to humiliate his opponents rather than win their understanding. Let us note first of all that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent Lord Kaiba has tried to sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. The other is whether or not Lord Kaiba periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. I hope that humanity will rid this earth of raving blatherskites with the greatest dispatch, since otherwise, the earth might well become rid of humanity. For a variety of reasons, some strategic, some ideological, some attitudinal, and all of them wrong, barbaric dunderheads embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. My own position on this issue is both simple and clear: All the deals Lord Kaiba makes are strictly one-way. Lord Kaiba gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. If Fate desired that he make a correct application of what he had read about charlatanism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the callous suborner of perjury would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, he sometimes has trouble convincing people that he does the things he does "for the children". When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few grotesque party animals to constate authoritatively that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that Lord Kaiba ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:

Fact: Juxtaposed to this is the idea that Lord Kaiba used twisted and self-contradictory logic to arrive at his conclusion that he has achieved sainthood.

Fact: He frequently progresses into displays of authority he doesn't have.

Fact: We have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to drive off and disperse the mawkish smart alecks who feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations.

In addition, his favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Lord Kaiba likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that the destructive power of Lord Kaiba's pronouncements is their appeal to the supercilious, the dastardly, the nettlesome, and the nefarious. If you doubt this, just ask around. I must ask that Lord Kaiba's hired goons shine a light on Lord Kaiba's efforts to adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses.

Lord Kaiba holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who open new avenues for the expression of hate. I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Lord Kaiba. Here's what I have to say to them: Lord Kaiba has been known to say that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. That notion is so reckless, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. He teaches workshops on corporatism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp.

As everyone knows, Lord Kaiba's hastily mounted campaigns are a public admission of his immaturity and insensitivity. What you might not know, however, is that one of his trucklers once said, "There is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of rash stereotypes." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that I am utterly shocked and angered by Lord Kaiba's nasty improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. If I said that children should belong to the state, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being thoroughly honest if I said that I wonder what would happen if he really did treat anyone who doesn't agree with him to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. There's a spooky thought. A few days ago, Lord Kaiba actually admitted that he wants to oppress, segregate, and punish others. Can you believe that? Perhaps Lord Kaiba forgot to take his antipsychotics that day. An additional clue is that his remarks have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply biased. Now, not only are they both irresponsible and gruesome, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that I've heard of eccentric things like fanaticism and parasitism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Lord Kaiba's ignorant, unthinking, feckless brain is too small to understand. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that Lord Kaiba III's decisions are based on reason. Now you know that that statement can be most easily defended, since it is not quantitative, but qualitative.


rawr :P
 
There are some comments I need to make regarding The QCDN Flameboard. First off, we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what's happening in the world. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that The QCDN Flameboard focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, she attempts to twist and distort facts to justify her feelings but that just goes to show that in asserting that we're supposed to shut up and smile when she says disingenuous things, she demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Trapped by the cognitive dissonance engendered by hard evidence and common sense, The QCDN Flameboard feels obligated to gain a respectable foothold for her combative communications in a mumpish, heartless attempt to justify her personal attacks. Okay, now it's time to offend a few people. Actually, I hope not to offend anyone, although she speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables her to turn over our country to officious, spineless bureaucrats. If there's a rule, and she keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, she coins polysyllabic neologisms to make her belief systems sound like they're actually important. In fact, her treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

We must launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of interventionism. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to provide you with a holistic and thematic history of The QCDN Flameboard's impolitic ideas. The QCDN Flameboard's sophistries are not witty satire, as she would have you believe. They're simply the discourteous ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what she's mocking.

It seems to me that The QCDN Flameboard is both soulless and biased. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one. Now, I hope she was joking when she implied she was going to make bribery legal and part of business as usual, but it sure didn't sound like it.

Before I continue, let me state that whenever The QCDN Flameboard's coadjutors say that she can override nature, their noses grow by a few centimeters. But there's the cock rub; her operatives are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is The QCDN Flameboard, who wants nothing less than to fuel inquisitions. I, speaking as someone who is not a bookish jackanape penis, see two problems with her disquisitions on a very fundamental level. First, I would very much like to see her crawl back under the rock dick she slithered out from. And second, many people are incredulous when I tell them that she intends to anesthetize the human twig and berries spirit. "How could The QCDN Flameboard be so venom-spouting one eyed trouser snake?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is sincerely possible, and now I'll explain exactly how The QCDN Flameboard plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that if she truly believes that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior, then maybe she should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101with professor meat and 2 veg.

The QCDN Flameboard clings to libertinism like a drowning man clings to a life preserver, yes. But I am not fooled by The QCDN Flameboard's laughable and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that I've tried explaining to The QCDN Flameboard's expositors that things are apt to get worse before they get better. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that in order to challenge The QCDN Flameboard to defend her canards or else to change them, we must encourage open, civic engagement. And that's just the first step. Remember, I and The QCDN Flameboard part company when it comes to the issue of Maoism. She feels that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance, while I claim that if she doesn't like it here, then perhaps she should go elsewhere. This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about The QCDN Flameboard's choleric behavior, but about the way that I myself have to wonder where The QCDN Flameboard got the idea that it is my view that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. From a purely technical point of view, she might tell everyone else what to do faster than you can say "plethysmographically". What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome?

For those who need very specific examples in order to grasp the significance of The QCDN Flameboard's philosophies, I'll give a very specific example: Think for a moment about the way that one of The QCDN Flameboard's apostles keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that The QCDN Flameboard sometimes has trouble convincing people that she has a "special" perspective on feudalism which carries with it a "special" right to suborn unimaginative, neurotic suborners of perjury to interfere with my efforts to fight for our freedom of speech. When she has such trouble, she usually trots out a few cynical nudniks to constate authoritatively that men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. Whether or not that trick of hers works, it's still the case that The QCDN Flameboard believes that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. Unfortunately, as long as she believes such absurdities, she will continue to commit atrocities of pornographic misconduct, including man/sheep love. My position is that I condemn The QCDN Flameboard's carnival-barker gimmicks. She, in contrast, argues that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and The QCDN Flameboard. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for her to admit that I find that logorrheic, hidebound idiots are no different from aberrent hooker layabouts. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that this is a free country, and I contend we ought to keep it that way. As sure as you're born, we must bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to spread the word about her deplorable initiatives to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers -- even to strangers. You must be the one to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on The QCDN Flameboard's prudish, jaded ruses. And you must inform your fellow man that The QCDN Flameboard's sympathizers believe that what I call treasonous delinquents are easily housebroken. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least.

The QCDN Flameboard's proposed social programs reek of particularism. I use the word "reek" because I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with The QCDN Flameboard and her apple-polishers, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that The QCDN Flameboard frequently plays on our emotions. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. At the risk of shocking you further, I shall point out that The QCDN Flameboard has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. She can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches The QCDN Flameboard's nostrils, she'll start talking about the joy of corporatism and how the media should "create" news rather than report it. As you listen to The QCDN Flameboard's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice her hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that her goal is to promote the total destruction of individuality in favor of an all-powerful group. This is abject diabolism! She is a social liability. What are the lessons for us in this? First, it's that the blatant ignorance and social maladjustment of her agendas will undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence as soon as our backs are turned. And second, I call upon her to stop her oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon her to be a woman of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon her to forgo her desire to produce a new generation of grumpy, myopic used-car salesmen whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized.

Think about it. It's my hunch that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, today, we might have let The QCDN Flameboard intensify or perpetuate sectarianism. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. It would be charitable of me not to mention that we have to consider all of our options. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that you might say, "History teaches us that to ignore or dismiss people like The QCDN Flameboard simply as otiose beggars can have devastating consequences." Fine, I agree. But the issue of what to do about amateurish casuists is a hopelessly tangled and complicated issue, impossible to discuss due to the intensity with which each side holds its beliefs. That's just a fancy way of saying that I, speaking as someone who is not a snippy fork-tongued-type scrotum, stand by what I've written before, that The QCDN Flameboard appears to have a problem with common sense and logic. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. A trip to your local library would reveal that there's an important difference between me and The QCDN Flameboard. Namely, I, for one, am willing to die for my cause. The QCDN Flameboard, in contrast, is willing to kill for hers -- or, if not to kill, at least to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle.

How can The QCDN Flameboard live with herself, knowing that her speeches tend to be more phatic than illustrative? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that dichotomous thinking has stymied her ability to reach solutions. The second, more telling, observation is that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by The QCDN Flameboard's clueless remonstrations. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a lawless agenda. I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from solipsism, credentialism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that if one could get a Ph.D. in Mysticism, The QCDN Flameboard would be the first in line to have one. Because "theologicohistorical" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that her précis have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, boobies) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply unholy. Now, not only are they both ungrateful and intransigent, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Why doesn't The QCDN Flameboard try doing something constructive for once in her life?" I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that The QCDN Flameboard is up to, the more shocking things, things like how she wants to restructure the social, political, and economic relationships throughout the entire society. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but she should feel ashamed of herself. And here, I believe, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in her invectives. Does The QCDN Flameboard have trouble living with herself, knowing that she considers it her calling to preach the gospel of unilateralism to every living creature? After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that she's more than dissolute. The QCDN Flameboard's mega-dissolute. In fact, to understand just how dissolute she is, you first need to realize that The QCDN Flameboard pompously claims that she commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. Let me be clear. For all of her professed concern for human rights, The QCDN Flameboard has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those voluble rabble-rousers who deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. The sooner she comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

A great many of us don't want The QCDN Flameboard to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international nihilism. But we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to her atrabilious holier-than-thou attitudes. The dominant characteristic of her mutinous circulars is not that they coordinate a revolution, but that, in the bargain, they break down age-old institutions and customs. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that stoicism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's The QCDN Flameboard's favorite; it makes it easy for her to inure us to antisocial Lysenkoism. Okay, I've vented enough frustration. So let me end by saying that in times of economic, social, or political crisis, small groups that put loud thoughts in our children's minds suddenly gain a mass following.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top