X said:Yeah, a pt that knows how to use a bard.... can't remember the last time.... Now BST, there's a true challenge![]()
The marathon job. Lots of exercise running
X said:Yeah, a pt that knows how to use a bard.... can't remember the last time.... Now BST, there's a true challenge![]()
How can running around buffing, watching for needed debuffs, watching for status effect to cure, and trying to squeeze in curagas/cure3s easier than auto attacking as a DD? Seriosly, give some kind of justifcation or reasoning as to why you think that instead of just the statment. In my partys that know how to work with a brd, I commonly end up as puller to increase effiency, that alone makes it more difficult than just doing /a followed by a couple tp macros (assuming your partner isn't using windower and lets you skip this) and eventualy a /ws "I d0 uBer dMge n0wz!!11". How do you justify every other job in the game being more difficult than brd?assuming your party knows what to do with a Bard in it, it is the easiest job around.
vang said:OMG TEHRE R JUZT AZ MNY R4C1zt NA LOL!!11
Rones said:How do you justify every other job in the game being more difficult than brd?
I never implied otherwise and fully understand you must balance attack and str for normal attacks. However, this entire discussion was about ws for sam, not mnk normal attacks. In the situation of sam ws, I'll stand by my numbers that +str etudes are a waste.Remember, damage caps on weapons vary from type to type. Infinite attack is not always the best solution.
You've never seen a good brd then. I'm eagerly looking foward to 72 so I can get errant and all it's -enimity because I pull loads of hate on brd. Just ask Neophytal, he has some incredible gear and I'll still pull hate just as often as DD without even trying. Those debuffs and buffs all give a moderate amount of hate. Add in a curaga 1 or 2 with a couple cure 3s and I've got hate. I carry around a tanking gear now all set to macro in because I pull hate so often (Earth staff, carpace helmet, carpace body, carpace hands, and looking at adding some more soon). I have even gone so far as to put merits into -enimity just to help my brd as my whm doesn't have hate issues.A bard doens't risk much, if anything. They pull virtually no hate in what they do.
That's just like saying subbing war or thf is not required for a melee. About 1/3 of the spells/songs I cast are whm cures and -na spells. My whm sub is a huge factor in my ability to contribute to the party. That is also why I have over 300 mp as a brd/whm at 69 (1/3 a full whm's normal mp tank).Subbing whitemage is not required, but the norm since it offers more than just songs to the PT as well.
I expect bards to play to the maximum of their abilities. Sadly, most people's expectations are much lower because they are happy to just have a brd at all. Playing to your max as a brd involves way more than being mobile as I described in my previous post. You have to constantly watch for mob buffs, watch for your debuffs wearing, watch for status effects on teammates to cure, watch teammates hp just like a whm does to cure them, watching my hate lvl, and keep track of your song times so you can refresh them just before they wear. If you are good and organized enough you can even squeeze in a couple ticks of rest with a dark staff for some free extra mp. I'm constantly monitoring 4-5 different thing...you are watching your hate lvl to decide when you should stop attacking and for the mob to reach 50% health so you can ws. Yep, your job is much more difficult. :roll:The only thing bard has for it thats required and more "difficult" than another party member is that they need to be mobile. They are not expected to do anything else.
LOL, don't talk to a brd about macros. I don't have a single macro as brd that doesn't change at least one piece of equipment, usually 2-3, and sometimes 5-6. However, having lots of equip swapping in macro doesn't make either job hard. The equip gets changed with whatever activity you were trying to do anyway, so in that repect it becomes a moot point. (eg: I fire macro to cast lullaby, it also changes 5 pieces of equipment with no extra work required).But maybe I should post my macro list, my equipment and macroed in selections to show you it's not all that easy.
Yeah, just autoattacking and leaving doesn't get 100% performance, but it does come much closer than any mage can do (brd included).Does that mean every melee does what I do? Ofcourse not, many do indeed auto attack and forgetabou'it like you say.
I would really like to see a rdm or brd bot that can come even close to performing like a human player at those jobs. It is easy for a bot to come close to the performance of a human melee DD, but a mage's job is dynamic and constantly active. Mage's are reactive, and in the case of the brd being mobile alone rules out botting ability. I would love to see a bot that could move to the right position for melee and mage buffs alone without hitting others. This becomes even more complicated by the fact that parties are mobile, while they may stay in the same camp, they are constantly moving a little farther foward or back, so using static points wouldn't work.Sure, you can macro bot a BRD or RDM, it's really not that difficult. Sure, it's harder than /attack and /follow, but it's doable.
Rones said:a mage's job is dynamic and constantly active.
LOL, you really need to try your hand at programming AI before claiming it is that easy. I'm curious how you would script the brd movement alone. SE doesn't even have any AI in the game advanced enough to mimic proper mage activity without human input. The npc healer mode is about the closest they have come, but it always stands in aoe range, can't decide when to rest on its own, and is pretty random with the rest of its spells. Additionaly, that rdm/whm style doesn't even compare to the activity a brd must put forth.All it would really require to bot a mage is windower to change your <p#> around in an outside script. Then just load it up with /targets, /ma's, /heals, and you have a sufficient botted mage.
vang said:Is there anyone that uses the internet anymore that isn't an anti republican/bush pussy sissy boy?
Mokk said:vang said:Is there anyone that uses the internet anymore that isn't an anti republican/bush pussy sissy boy?
I had to respond to this .. it's priceless .. now here this right-wing republican/bush loving pussy masochists:
Zogby Poll: 42% diapproval
Gallup Poll: 51% disapproval (according to gallup's site)
Currently he holds the lowest approval rating of ANY second term president as even a marginal 10% of the people who actually voted for him think he sucks at his job and are bordering on looking for a reason for impeachment
I've got friends getting shot at oversease, i'm paying more for just about everything (not just gas), and currently my state's medicare is going bankrupt and being removed leaving thousands who need medical care in the cold to fend for themselves.
In future instead of just bashing people who think differently than you due to being in different situations in life than you are by name calling why not go out on a limb and explain your conviction. I know you've got the brains in you to do at least that much
On a side note as the polls show it's not just us "anti republican/bush pussy sissy boys" who have a problem with this moron it's us, the rest of the world, and approaching 1/4 of his supporters. Clearly there's an issue if your disapproval rating is higher than your vote % in the last election. Regardless of vehement support from blathering idiots in comfortable life situations the man is going to go down as one of the worst presidents in history, no bones about it.
Skaw said:That would be maximum amount, not minimum.![]()