- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 2,555
- Age
- 42
- Location
- somewhere...
- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- FFXI
- Dejavu
- FFXIV
- Won't play this game
Recently there was a very interesting piece on 20/20 where John Stossel argues for the re-evaluation of certain policies that are so controversial that it is generally accepted that you cannot even have an honest conversation about the topic.
The first clip is his argument that pregnancy should not be protected by anti discrimination laws because they are counter productive.
In the second clip he argues that companies should irradiate the food supply to kill bacteria and illness due to food poisoning is far more dangerous than irradiation.
The third part of the special was that people who get themselves into trouble and need to be rescued should have to pay for their own rescue rather than the money coming from the taxpayers.
The forth segment is my personal favorite... it states that the way to save endangered species is to allow for private ownership and allow for people to eat them.
The fifth segment argues for the legalization of steroids for anyone who chooses to use them from a government perspective. Then if the sport chooses to ban them in their sport that is their business.
The final segment argues that old people are greedy and should get less money from the government seeing as an old person gets 6 dollars for every 1 that goes to a young person.
I am looking for a debate on all 6 of these subjects and seeing as it will probably be somewhat confusing with 6 arguments going on at once please clearly label what you are talking about so that it can be understood. Please use the titles Pregnant, Irradiation, Accidents, Animals, Steroids and Old to specify what you are going to talk about.
The first clip is his argument that pregnancy should not be protected by anti discrimination laws because they are counter productive.
In the second clip he argues that companies should irradiate the food supply to kill bacteria and illness due to food poisoning is far more dangerous than irradiation.
The third part of the special was that people who get themselves into trouble and need to be rescued should have to pay for their own rescue rather than the money coming from the taxpayers.
The forth segment is my personal favorite... it states that the way to save endangered species is to allow for private ownership and allow for people to eat them.
The fifth segment argues for the legalization of steroids for anyone who chooses to use them from a government perspective. Then if the sport chooses to ban them in their sport that is their business.
The final segment argues that old people are greedy and should get less money from the government seeing as an old person gets 6 dollars for every 1 that goes to a young person.
I am looking for a debate on all 6 of these subjects and seeing as it will probably be somewhat confusing with 6 arguments going on at once please clearly label what you are talking about so that it can be understood. Please use the titles Pregnant, Irradiation, Accidents, Animals, Steroids and Old to specify what you are going to talk about.
Old
I think that old people deserve what they get...