This thread will be a smashing success.
Blackmagik said:Chemical_Penguin said:Peregrine said:Why does everyone have to make it about jobs? Orchid mentioned a dark knight comment. Why does it have to go there? Why bring some ugly real-world thing like discrimination into a situation where personal integrity should bear more weight
I lol'd IRL
www.qcdn.org/viewtopic.php?t=18161
hahaha Pere, u just got OWND in the ASS now plz dont post b4 they might own u some more
Peregrine said:Go ahead. Or are you content to take chickenshots at me without really making any points? I'm waiting.
Peregrine said:Blackmagik said:Chemical_Penguin said:Peregrine said:Why does everyone have to make it about jobs? Orchid mentioned a dark knight comment. Why does it have to go there? Why bring some ugly real-world thing like discrimination into a situation where personal integrity should bear more weight
I lol'd IRL
www.qcdn.org/viewtopic.php?t=18161
hahaha Pere, u just got OWND in the ASS now plz dont post b4 they might own u some more
I'm sorry, who are you again? Don't recall that your opinion means much. Go ahead. Say the word, kiddos. Put the fanboy signal up and call all the regulars. I got time.
Geee ya think? This really is difficult to talk to people who think they're two steps ahead when they're really way behind. It's like the dumbass in the last thread who thought I didn't know from the start that Mandaus poisoned. Catch up, pokes. We're not even on the same levels yet.CubsWoo said:you realize you post yourself into these situations, right?
If I need someone to dispel/refresh, I'm not calling a dark knight, I'm calling a rdm. That's not any form of favortism, that's game mechanics. You also don't know their party setup, so you don't know what they did and did not need.Peregrine said:Cowards. Kissing the red mage's ass while sending the dark knight away because they're of no use to you, while trying to pick fights with someone who just LOVES to see hypocrites get their panties in a wad because while they're all about the equality on a message board...they like how good discrimination has done them in the game. They LOVE being able to wave away other bars of inequality to use the one that serves them the most.
CubsWoo said:Put simply:
- Peregrine says people shouldn't discriminate based on job
- Chemical_Penguin brings up the topic where Peregrine argued for 5+ pages that a RDM should not be able to use Excalibur because they aren't enough like King Arthur.
- Peregrine ignores this point and tells everyone to raise the fanboy signal for reasons unknown.
That's all. I dunno if I'm posting in this thread again, but you realize you post yourself into these situations, right?
CubsWoo said:who would you be to tell me that since BLMs have a higher natural INT and Claustrum is a part of the brain, they'd deserve the first fully upgraded one before me?
CubsWoo said:The Excalibur case isn't about jobism no matter how you want to spin it. If you have enough gil to upgrade a Relic, you deserve said Relic. A rich DRG will get Gungnir. A rich SMN, Claustrum. If I scrimped and farmed and crafted and saved my way to the 500+ million gil necessary to upgrade to a Claustrum, who would you be to tell me that since BLMs have a higher natural INT and Claustrum is a part of the brain, they'd deserve the first fully upgraded one before me?
Peregrine said:You can't sit there and tell me what the Excalibur thread was and wasn't about.
CubsWoo said:So why was the first fully-upgraded relic a Scythe?
Skaw said:CubsWoo said:So why was the first fully-upgraded relic a Scythe?
Thought it was the Bow.
Regardless, that wasn't the first relic complete.