'Michael Bryant charged in cyclist's death' Proud Canadian Moment

Morcheeba

Buaidh no Bàs
Adventurer
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
4,070
Age
44
Location
G.W.N.
FFXIV
Morcheeba
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/689220

Michael Bryant charged in cyclist's death

Former Ontario attorney general Michael Bryant has been charged with criminal negligence causing death after a 33-year-old cyclist was struck and killed last night.

He was also charged with dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death.

Friends identified the victim as bicycle courier Darcy Allan Sheppard, father of three.

Bryant, 43, spent the night and morning in custody. He stared straight ahead as he left the Traffic Services police station at about 2:30 p.m. today, amid the flash of cameras and buzz of reporters' questions.

Dressed in a suit, but looking tired and distraught, he read a brief statement.

"May I ask for your understanding in not making a statement today on last night's tragic events. At an appropriate moment I will of course speak to you.

"I would, however, like to extend my deepest condolences to the family of Mr. Sheppard. To all those who have offered support to my family in the past 12 hours, thank you," Bryant said, choking up slightly.

Bryant is scheduled to appear in Old City Hall court on Oct. 19.

Sheppard, who was called Al by friends, was likely heading to his new home in the Dupont and Dufferin Sts. area at the time of the incident, friends said. They said Sheppard had just got back together with his on-again-off-again girlfriend, Misty, and had said he wanted to marry her.

"Things were starting to go well for him right around now. Stuff was looking good for him," said 24-year-old Sana, who did not want to give her last name.

Witnesses on Bloor St. last night described a heated confrontation between the driver of a black Saab convertible and a cyclist that began near Bloor and Bay Sts. at about 9:45 p.m.

Police Sgt. Tim Burrows said that after a minor collision, the cyclist grabbed hold of the car, which drove west on Bloor toward Avenue Rd.

Witnesses said the cyclist clung to the driver's side of the car, which had its top down, while the driver yelled at him to get off.

The vehicle veered into the eastbound lanes and mounted the curb, brushing against trees and poles. The victim was apparently run over by the rear wheels of the vehicle, witnesses said.

The driver's wife was a passenger in the car, police said.

"Lots of people were watching and they couldn't believe what was happening," said Ryan Brazeau, a worker with a crew laying sewer pipes on Bloor.

One construction worker told CTV News he heard the squeal of tires and saw the car racing the wrong way down the street past their construction site, with the cyclist hanging onto the car.

"The guy hanging onto the car, hit the mailbox, hit the road, (then) . . . the car ran over him with the back tires," the witness said. "The guy bounced and the car sped off . . . the person was there just bleeding."

The witness said he felt sick to his stomach when he saw the cyclist "bleeding from his head, his mouth."

Sheppard was taken to St. Michael's Hospital with serious head injuries and died around midnight.

Burrows said a large portion of the incident was captured on surveillance video and that investigators are working to fill in the gaps.

Police said alcohol was not involved.

Around 9 a.m. today two of Sheppard's friends sat on the sidewalk scrawling notes for their friend, which they taped to a tree.

"He had a rough go," Will Pierson, 26, said. "And just this last week he had kind of turned his place around and all these things were starting to look up for him and that's why it's such a f-ing tragedy."

Pierson said he saw a bike on the news on TV this morning and recognized the wheel set as Sheppard's. He and Sana went to find him afterward at his home, but no one answered.

A friend called at that time and told them the news, Sana said.

The last time Pierson saw Sheppard was yesterday morning and they had chatted about guitar amps.

He and Sana were supposed to swing by Sheppard's house after work yesterday, but no one answered when they got there.

"He was totally getting his life back on track, which is the part that makes it really, really hard to deal with," Pierson said.

He figured half the couriers in Toronto were in mourning today.

Indeed, cyclist friends planned to return to the spot where Sheppard died for a memorial. On the website Biking Toronto Forum, a message was posted that said they planned to gather at 5 p.m. Wednesday at Bay and Bloor, ride along Bloor to Avenue Rd., and lay down their bikes for five minutes of silence.

Friends also said Sheppard was an amateur stand-up comedian who sometimes performed at open mike nights at local clubs.

Bryant has reportedly been in contact with a lawyer. Around 12:50 p.m., lawyer Andrew Evangelista arrived at Traffic Services in a black Cadillac, saying he was visiting Bryant as counsel and as a friend.

Bryant was first elected MPP for St. Paul's in 1999 and won re-election in 2003 and 2007. He was awarded Now Magazine's Best Toronto MPP for 2008.

Residents on a small street in the St. Paul's riding said they were shocked to hear about the alleged incident.

"I just saw the headline," said one man, who asked not to be named.

"He's a busy guy, we don't see him around very much."

When a Star reporter visited Bryant's two-storey Victorian home on Foxbar Rd., at the intersection of St. Clair W. and Avenue Rd., a woman closed the curtains. She could then be seen in the window talking on the phone while two children played.

Bryant was Ontario's youngest-ever attorney general, serving throughout the McGuinty government's first four-year term.

Bryant legalized paralegals, fixed election dates, banned pit bulls, overhauled the human rights system, re-created the Law Reform Commission, re-established civilian oversight of police and depoliticized Justice of the Peace appointments.

Bryant, who also served as aboriginal affairs minister, stepped down as Ontario's economic development minister in May to become president and CEO of the new Invest Toronto corporation chaired by Mayor David Miller.

In a statement issued this morning, Miller expressed "sincere condolences to the family and friends of the cyclist who died last night following an incident in the Yorkville area."

But citing the ongoing police investigation, he declined to comment further.

Bryant's former boss, Premier Dalton McGuinty, also reacted to news of the accident at a press conference this morning calling it "very sad, very tragic.

"My thoughts are with the family and friends of the gentleman who lost his life," he said.

McGuinty stayed away from answering questions as to how Bryant should be treated in court, given his former ministerial position with the Attorney General.

"With respect to the case itself, I think the best thing to do is let the investigation unfold," said McGuinty. "I have confidence that anyone who comes before Ontario courts will be treated with due process."

Way to exercise common sense.

If a small collision happens, whether you feel it's too insignificant to justify calling it in or slowing down your night, the vic involved may feel differently. I am assuming the cyclist wanted him to stay or call the police or something.

Judging by his refusing to let go of the drivers headrest. A bit of fault is in the vics hands. However as such a establish member of society he should have exercised better judgment and handled the situation.
 
Last edited:
The whole thing is fucked up on both sides.

Also, wtf with the OGL. Our province is messed up Cheebs.
 
The whole thing is fucked up on both sides.

Also, wtf with the OGL . Our province is messed up Cheebs.

Yea it's certainly messed up. I say we should have let Coors keep their 'Colder than Torontonians' add up in B.C.


lol OLG. yeah and you know how much they rake in in a year?

$1.15 expensed by some bimbo who shares my last name for a cloth grocery bag. Because you know she uses that bag for business purposes. That's sad even processing the damn paperwork for $1.15. Fucking morons. Greed in it's worst form. I'm glad they canned half the staff.
 
Last edited:
He could have got the license and called it in. He did not have to hold on. It could have been something as simple as he was trying to play something on the driver. TV shows teens and other bike/skateboard riders grabbing cars driving to go faster. I have to wonder why he kept holding on? It is sad both sides acted so irrationally. My prayers go out to both families. They have to live with this for the rest of their lives.
 
Witnesses said the cyclist clung to the driver's side of the car, which had its top down, while the driver yelled at him to get off.

...And alcohol wasn't involved? Wow.
 
Biker sounds like an idiot. Driver probably didn't think he'd end up killing the guy. I think the original fault lies in the biker though. I mean, what he did was incredibly dangerous.
 
Biker sounds like an idiot. Driver probably didn't think he'd end up killing the guy. I think the original fault lies in the biker though. I mean, what he did was incredibly dangerous.

Would you not stop once you realized the guy was still clinging on?

Better yet would you even attempt to drive KNOWING the guy was being irrational and not letting go?

Fault is on both ends most definitely. However if I were in the drivers side I would have stopped when he first hit the mailbox, nvm after hitting that, then a pole and finally running over him ... ; ;
 
If some nut job is holding on to my driver's side door, while i'm in a convertible with the top down, there is no way i would stop. The chance he's gonna try and pull me out of the car or pull a knife/gun is way too great, once he hit a mail box i would speed up even more.

The whole "minor collision" thing seems pretty sketchy. If the car hit him he should have just gotten the license plate and called it in not held on for whatever stupid reason he had.
 
Cyclist was drunk, from the reports I've read. It's still being investigated, so everything is 'alleged'.

Either way, it's a shitty way to end a promising career.
 
If some nut job is holding on to my driver's side door, while i'm in a convertible with the top down, there is no way i would stop. The chance he's gonna try and pull me out of the car or pull a knife/gun is way too great, once he hit a mail box i would speed up even more.

The whole "minor collision" thing seems pretty sketchy. If the car hit him he should have just gotten the license plate and called it in not held on for whatever stupid reason he had.

It's illegal to leave the scene and would be that much harder to prove after the fact.

I want to see the surveillance they said was taken.

And apparently alcohol was not involved. At least that's what this article says.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2009/09/02/toronto-cyclist-memorial.html

This one says the vic got off his bike. He was trying to keep the two from driving away from a minor accident.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/09/01/toronto-cyclist-collision-death481.html

Witnesses here say it appeared 'he' was trying to knock him off his car by hitting against trees, poles other obstacles. All while the vic was on foot.
 
Last edited:
Its illegal to do a lot of things. Most of which i wouldn't run along side a moving car to do. Especially if the car was trying to run me in to things.
 
If some idiot was hanging off my window, I probably would drive faster to get away from him. First reason, it's insane to do that. Second reason, insane people may do other insane things. Third reason, why should I give a shit about this asshole?
 
If some idiot was hanging off my window, I probably would drive faster to get away from him. First reason, it's insane to do that. Second reason, insane people may do other insane things. Third reason, why should I give a shit about this asshole?

I don't know, to have some accountability for the incident??

That's something people seem to be taking on more and more, accountability for their actions.

I did say I think there is fault on both sides. But I also think there are many ways it could have been avoided.

So that man just ruined his life as well as the 33yr olds because he didn't want to face the confrontation an accident caused. Too bad.

The accident I was in, where I rear-ended a woman ( a moron), I laid into her. I chewed her a new asshole because of her stupidity. She decided to tell the person she hit they were free to go, before I knew who she hit. Man, woman, truck, car, I have no clue. And she let her car run while it was leaking fluids all over the road.

Anyway, people do stupid shit, and I can definitely see people becoming irrational after an accident. Even a minor one.

We don't know exactly what the accident was but considering he was on a bike it probably scared the living shit out of the man. So to then have the couple he was involved in the accident with try to take off, well, would you not get a little pissed?

Yeah there is fault on both ends, but someone has to be accountable. Perhaps they both were.

E- confirmed reports the cyclist had been drinking as per BreakfastTelevision this morning. Also confirmed the cyclist was not intoxicated but already irritated from an earlier dispute with his girlfriend that resulted in the police having to ask him to leave the property for the night.
 
Last edited:
I don't know, to have some accountability for the incident??

That's something people seem to be taking on more and more, accountability for their actions.

I did say I think there is fault on both sides. But I also think there are many ways it could have been avoided.

So that man just ruined his life as well as the 33yr olds because he didn't want to face the confrontation an accident caused. Too bad.

The accident I was in, where I rear-ended a woman ( a moron), I laid into her. I chewed her a new asshole because of her stupidity. She decided to tell the person she hit they were free to go, before I knew who she hit. Man, woman, truck, car, I have no clue. And she let her car run while it was leaking fluids all over the road.

Anyway, people do stupid shit, and I can definitely see people becoming irrational after an accident. Even a minor one.

We don't know exactly what the accident was but considering he was on a bike it probably scared the living shit out of the man. So to then have the couple he was involved in the accident with try to take off, well, would you not get a little pissed?

Yeah there is fault on both ends, but someone has to be accountable. Perhaps they both were.

E- confirmed reports the cyclist had been drinking as per BreakfastTelevision this morning. Also confirmed the cyclist was not intoxicated but already irritated from an earlier dispute with his girlfriend that resulted in the police having to ask him to leave the property for the night.

#1 You have not seen video surveillance of the "accident". Who's to say it's not the EXACT SAME SCENARIO YOU DESCRIBED. Where one asshole rear-ends somebody, then "tears them a new asshole". Maybe the guy on the bike rear-ended the car, and the driver of the car didn't care, so he drove off. But no, drunk, lunatic guy who wants to tear him a new asshole decides he can't let this one go. So he makes a series of bad decisions that cost him his life. Accidental death is accidental, the guy who is accountable for his actions is dead now, so he paid his responsibility. You're crucifying the driver of the car without knowing any details.

#2 How can you confirm that a dead guy was drinking but not intoxicated? Are they saying that only blood tests are valid tests for intoxication?
 
Last edited:
This post is full of idiocy.

#1 You have not seen video surveillance of the "accident". Who's to say it's not the EXACT SAME SCENARIO YOU DESCRIBED. Where one asshole rear-ends somebody, then "tears them a new asshole". Maybe the guy on the bike rear-ended the car, and the driver of the car didn't care, so he drove off. But no, drunk, lunatic guy who wants to tear him a new asshole decides he can't let this one go. So he makes a series of bad decisions that cost him his life. Accidental death is accidental, the guy who is accountable for his actions is dead now, so he paid his responsibility. You're crucifying the driver of the car without knowing any details.

#2 How can you confirm that a dead guy was drinking but not intoxicated? Are they saying that only blood tests are valid tests for intoxication?

Do you not read? I'm commenting strictly on details given. Way to talk from your ass.

You're crucifying the driver of the car without knowing any details.

Yea, he should be responsible for his part. He practised poor judgement and it cost a man his life.

Yeah there is fault on both ends, but someone has to be accountable. Perhaps they both were.
E- confirmed reports the cyclist had been drinking as per BreakfastTelevision this morning. Also confirmed the cyclist was not intoxicated but already irritated from an earlier dispute with his girlfriend that resulted in the police having to ask him to leave the property for the night.

Your retort is full of idiocy seeing as you failed to absorb my post fully.

It was confirmed he was not intoxicated. This coming from officials. Okay so you say he was drunk, fuck he must have been drunk if it's coming from you right?

I do not know the details surrounding the accident itself except for what I have read over and over in multiple articles.

Sheppard's death on Monday night was the culmination of an escalating series of events that began after his bicycle was involved in what police called a "minor collision" at around 9:45 p.m. ET with Bryant's Saab convertible.

Witnesses said Sheppard got off his bicycle and hung on to Bryant's car as the former attorney general sped away.

Yeah he was a dumbass for holding onto a vehicle whose driver was determined to drive away from the scene of an accident he was involved in.

"We actually have viewed two videos that were provided to us by two different businesses along Bloor Street. We have officers right now on Bloor Street canvassing some of the other stores ... to see if they have any video that their systems may have captured," Burrows said.

Officials obviously viewed the footage and have commented on the incident based on that footage.
 
Last edited:
Obviously your reading comprehension levels are on par with your social skill levels. My question about his intoxication level was a general question. You're taking this way too personal. I was making the point that he had been drinking, just because he's not officially intoxicated does not mean he is not exhibiting drunken behavior.

Also, if you will read your post again, you will see that only one sentence shares blame. The rest of it lays all blame at the feet of the driver.

Edit: Your quotes regarding the surveillance of the accident do not support a claim of the accident being the driver's fault.
 
Last edited:
Obviously your reading comprehension levels are on par with your social skill levels. My question about his intoxication level was a general question. You're taking this way too personal. I was making the point that he had been drinking, just because he's not officially intoxicated does not mean he is not exhibiting drunken behavior.

Also, if you will read your post again, you will see that only one sentence shares blame. The rest of it lays all blame at the feet of the driver.

Hmmm, ok so you insult my post stating it's pure idiocy....

AND you state he was a drunk lunatic.. where the hell did you QUESTION whether he was officially found intoxicated?? You stated he was drunk before asking about any official statements, which btw are posted all over the place. Perhaps my reading comprehension is lacking but I don't see where exactly this question you posed lays.

I placed blame 2x, in that post btw.

However, in case you missed it, that pretty much outlined my lack of sympathy for the accused in this case.

The man should have been smarter.


So should have the cyclist.

The cyclist paid for his lack of judgement with his life, now the accountability for the accused comes into play. Too bad, soo sad.

Sympathy is in the dictionary >shit - syphilis<

I was simply laying out a scenario where the blame was on the cyclist.

The blame is on both ends. I haven't denied that once. I personally think being a driver of a 3000+lb vehicle you should be more responsible and take more care in your decisions. The cyclist had gotten off his bike and was on foot when he held fast.


Please read #2 of my first post.
You're right. Because you had initially stated he was drunk I dismissed the question, my bad.

Edit: I do apologize for stating your post was idiocy. If you go back and look I had actually edited that out before your first response. The whole situation you described where you rear ended someone then got out and yelled at them struck a nerve with me, so I responded the way I did.

There were extenuating circumstances in that incident. She was busy on her cell phone while letting her car run leaking a cocktail of fluids all over the ground. She got herself out of a charge and laid the entire fault at my feet because she told whomever SHE initially hit (causing me to rear-end her) to leave. She was an idiot and I was not only in shock but disgusted with her actions.
 
Last edited:
AND you state he was a drunk lunatic..

I was simply laying out a scenario where the blame was on the cyclist.

where the hell did you QUESTION whether he was officially found intoxicated?? Perhaps my reading comprehension is lacking but I don't see where exactly this question you posed lays.

Please read #2 of my first post.

Edit: I do apologize for stating your post was idiocy. If you go back and look I had actually edited that out before your first response. The whole situation you described where you rear ended someone then got out and yelled at them struck a nerve with me, so I responded the way I did.
Edit2: You seriously need a breather before you get all worked up the way you do. You need to read my initial post again, you took it all the wrong way, which is understandable since the very first sentence would have set you off.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top