You have yet to actually make any kind of arguement as to why Shura or AF2 would ever be better than Hauby+1 for DDing, except that "I must suck" If I prefer 5 acc over 5 attack, and that the -evasion is some ground breaking stat for DDing.
So why is AF2 or Shura better than Hauby+1 for DDing? Obviously you know more about Ninja than me, being that you have 292 Katana skill and years of end game ninja experience under your belt. I'd love to see how you justify 5 attack > 5 acc, or 1 attack > 3 acc. Please. Enlighten me.
Edit: I'd also like to QFT this. Stouter got this spot on.
Ok, let's go back to kindergarden, where we learned that one number is bigger than another.
I said you must suck if you NEED that 5 accuracy, not if you prefer it. At that level of gear it's obviously going to be nothing but a personal opinion. My accuracy is fine for me, so I prefer to hit a little harder rather than an incredibly small increase in overall accuracy. If you have a problem hitting(that's where you suck at 75), 5 accuracy is better, but if you're not having a problem hitting, 5 attack is better; I don't have a problem hitting, therefore the accuracy isn't beneficial. This is basic game mechanics, but you need me to explain it to you?
Try learning to actually read what people say rather than just skim for a few key words and then guess what their post was about; since that's all you've done in this thread so far. That's even further shown since you somehow think I said the -evasion is a big deal; even though I've clearly said exactly the opposite twice now.
Hell, you've yet to actually prove anything yourself. Evanos has done leaps more than you
ever have to disprove that Decidence info I mentioned. You're whining about it not being correct, but then don't show how. Now you whine that you've been a ninja for longer(who cares) and that seems to make you think it automatically makes you the god of all things ninja. You might know more than me(not by that much I'd bet), but you're not bothering to prove anything, just saying it's better because you said so.
I at least gave a source for my post and admitted that it's information is likely out of date by this point. You've done nothing.