- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Messages
- 3,650
- Age
- 50
- Location
- Delawhere?
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- Linkshell
- PhoenixPimps
- FFXIV
- Raesvelg Helheim
Since someone wanted a post made about this and was too lazy to do it themselves, I figured I'd get the ball rolling on this one.
Again.
Anyway.
The problem with talking about North Korea is that it's really hard to tell what they want. I mean, they pull shit like this all the time. Not quite to this scale in terms of casualties and blatant aggression, but the fact of the matter is that they've got quite a history of creating incidents that are right on the verge of a casus belli in order to push people, foreign or domestic, into doing what they want.
Which, of course, leads me back to my perennial point of not paying the danegeld, but I reckon you're all fairly tired of hearing that by now.
So, in all likelihood, we're looking at another iteration of the usual mess. North Korea does something outrageous, threatens war, and either quells internal dissent by way of the predictable negative international response, or gets something they need by way of the predictable Chamberlain-esque appeasement from the more wishy-washy members of the international community.
Which sadly can include any of us, depending on the intestinal fortitude of our elected officials. /sigh.
Of course, there are a handful of other possibilities. On the one hand, the military might be trying to destabilize the government and stage a coup. Or they could be trying to provoke a more significant response in order to stage a... Potemkin Incident, for lack of a better way to describe it. Poke the South with a stick enough times, get them to launch something significant, seed the area with an appropriate amount of apparent civilian casualties, cry foul, get concessions, etc.
Or they could be batshit insane and think that they could provoke a war that they could win. Since, despite the apparently disparity in the quantity of military hardware and personnel at their disposal, South Korea alone has a sufficient quantity of men and material that is qualitatively better (to the point of being almost a repeat of the first Gulf War) to make sure that any war North Korea instigates, South Korea can finish without any external assistance.
And they would have external assistance. We're still a bit bogged down in the Middle East, of course, and we're predictably in the middle of a draw-down that will probably leave us short-handed the next time we have a couple regional conflicts to intervene in, but like I said, South Korea wouldn't need much in the way of assistance. It'd be, for lack of a better word, gravy.
Of course, in a caveat on the aforementioned "Provoke a War" scenario, it's possible that they have concerns over the viability of their nuclear weapon delivery systems, and figure that international response would be a lot more limited if, when the South Koreans push across the DMZ, they were to set off a nuclear landmine in their own territory.
"Hey, we're not the aggressors here! Sure, we used a nuke, but it was on our own land! It's like a test! With... live subjects..."
And I guess we could be looking at a "Mouse that Roared" variation of the "Provoke a War" scenario. This would be another military coup situation, but less insane and more cunning than the "win the war" concept. Start the war. Lose. Get occupied and rebuilt by the people who just finished kicking your ass.
The weird thing is that, in some ways, I can see the appeal for this scenario as a way of saving North Korea from Kim Jong-il & Sons without... losing face. You don't actually have to stage a full-on coup, of course. Just have a handful of officers willing to die for the plan when they make the order to poke-with-stick.
Poke enough times, you get your war, you lose your war like you know you're going to, new government gets installed, military command is probably safe if they've not been actively participating in some sort of war crimes, North Korea becomes part of Korea, massive international investment ensues, profit. Or at least not worry about your populace starving to death for the greater glory of the Kims. All of that without ever being branded as some sort of traitor in the public eye.
Again.
Anyway.
The problem with talking about North Korea is that it's really hard to tell what they want. I mean, they pull shit like this all the time. Not quite to this scale in terms of casualties and blatant aggression, but the fact of the matter is that they've got quite a history of creating incidents that are right on the verge of a casus belli in order to push people, foreign or domestic, into doing what they want.
Which, of course, leads me back to my perennial point of not paying the danegeld, but I reckon you're all fairly tired of hearing that by now.
So, in all likelihood, we're looking at another iteration of the usual mess. North Korea does something outrageous, threatens war, and either quells internal dissent by way of the predictable negative international response, or gets something they need by way of the predictable Chamberlain-esque appeasement from the more wishy-washy members of the international community.
Which sadly can include any of us, depending on the intestinal fortitude of our elected officials. /sigh.
Of course, there are a handful of other possibilities. On the one hand, the military might be trying to destabilize the government and stage a coup. Or they could be trying to provoke a more significant response in order to stage a... Potemkin Incident, for lack of a better way to describe it. Poke the South with a stick enough times, get them to launch something significant, seed the area with an appropriate amount of apparent civilian casualties, cry foul, get concessions, etc.
Or they could be batshit insane and think that they could provoke a war that they could win. Since, despite the apparently disparity in the quantity of military hardware and personnel at their disposal, South Korea alone has a sufficient quantity of men and material that is qualitatively better (to the point of being almost a repeat of the first Gulf War) to make sure that any war North Korea instigates, South Korea can finish without any external assistance.
And they would have external assistance. We're still a bit bogged down in the Middle East, of course, and we're predictably in the middle of a draw-down that will probably leave us short-handed the next time we have a couple regional conflicts to intervene in, but like I said, South Korea wouldn't need much in the way of assistance. It'd be, for lack of a better word, gravy.
Of course, in a caveat on the aforementioned "Provoke a War" scenario, it's possible that they have concerns over the viability of their nuclear weapon delivery systems, and figure that international response would be a lot more limited if, when the South Koreans push across the DMZ, they were to set off a nuclear landmine in their own territory.
"Hey, we're not the aggressors here! Sure, we used a nuke, but it was on our own land! It's like a test! With... live subjects..."
And I guess we could be looking at a "Mouse that Roared" variation of the "Provoke a War" scenario. This would be another military coup situation, but less insane and more cunning than the "win the war" concept. Start the war. Lose. Get occupied and rebuilt by the people who just finished kicking your ass.
The weird thing is that, in some ways, I can see the appeal for this scenario as a way of saving North Korea from Kim Jong-il & Sons without... losing face. You don't actually have to stage a full-on coup, of course. Just have a handful of officers willing to die for the plan when they make the order to poke-with-stick.
Poke enough times, you get your war, you lose your war like you know you're going to, new government gets installed, military command is probably safe if they've not been actively participating in some sort of war crimes, North Korea becomes part of Korea, massive international investment ensues, profit. Or at least not worry about your populace starving to death for the greater glory of the Kims. All of that without ever being branded as some sort of traitor in the public eye.