POL NEWS : Accounts 4000 Banned (Feb. 21)

They don't have to scan your entire PC to detect if you're using windower. They just have to scan FFXI/POL DLL files that are in use to see if anything is hooked into them, and if so, they can ban you for tampering with the files. Once you agree to any EULA, you lose any rights in regard to "their" files that are required to login to their servers and play their games.

They have plenty of rights to monitor those files.
 
meeze said:
You don't have to worry about that with all that botting power in your LS.
Whatever you say little man. We know that we dont, so I just laugh. You can come up with whatever exuses you need to justify your inability to claim.
 
Marajade said:
Whatever you say little man. We know that we dont, so I just laugh. You can come up with whatever exuses you need to justify your inability to claim.

I wish I had PC so I could show you SS of one of your members laughing about how someone elses bot is owning boticles.

Keep living with your head up your ass, I'll being a "failure" for not hacking myself 1337 gear.
 
meeze said:
I wish I had PC so I could show you SS of one of your members laughing about how someone elses bot is owning boticles.
I could show you screenshots of LS chat with the same jokes. Its a giant joke on this side, and its on you guys.

<Marajade> WOO! I claimed! Can I be called a bot now too?
 
Marajade said:
I could show you screenshots of LS chat with the same jokes. Its a giant joke on this side, and its on you guys.

<Marajade> WOO! I claimed! Can I be called a bot now too?

Claim 1/2 of your Nidhoggs, including the one where you get E.Body, and you can join the club too.

I even know a player who joined your LS, that has admitted to me, to using bot-hax.

I don't need you to tell me whether your LS bots or not, when friends of mine in your LS admit they do themselves.
 
meeze said:
I even know a player who joined your LS, that has admitted to me, to using bot-hax.

I don't need you to tell me whether your LS bots or not, when friends of mine in your LS admit they do themselves.
Give me names, and they'll be gone if we believe it. PM them if you want. Our policy is not to bot. We concluded internaly that the allegations against Chronicles were false, and moved on to ignoring you rabble. If any of what you're saying is true, and these supposed people truly do, They'll be removed.

Unless of course you're refering to lolNecrosis who was removed.
 
Marajade said:
Give me names, and they'll be gone if we believe it. PM them if you want. Our policy is not to bot. We concluded internaly that the allegations against Chronicles were false, and moved on to ignoring you rabble. If any of what you're saying is true, and these supposed people truly do, They'll be removed.

Unless of course you're refering to lolNecrosis who was removed.

Don't plan on throwing my friend under the bus, and this person is still an active member of your LS.
 
Skaw said:
He's also a liar, and most likely a thief. But hey, if you want to believe someone like that completely, go ahead.

The difference between is it and will they is very large. Is Windower detectable? Ofcourse. Anything on a PC, running or otherwise is. Will they? No, because as of their current ToS, it is completely 100% globally illegal for them to do it.
i admitted to lying about my suspension, thats all i ever lied about in your eyes, i dont see how that makes me a liar with everything i say.

Windower= Detectable and ive provided solid proof of code that showed it on this very forum.

besides that ive never stolen anything, i wont say in my life because i know ive stolen candy as a kid. Any game or cd i have a copy of, I own. The only time this isnt true is if i get the copy because it came out earlier than the official release, To which i own it before i buy it.
 
meeze said:
Don't plan on throwing my friend under the bus, and this person is still an active member of your LS.
Then i'll accept it as an attempt to hide your inability to claim and direct my attention from it. Good day sir, you obviously have nothing.
 
Chasym said:
Windower= Detectable and ive provided solid proof of code that showed it on this very forum.
No, you didnt. You came up with the cockamaimy(sp) story about it increasing your movement speed, and claimed that as your irrefutable proof.

You're a hack, begone already.
 
Marajade said:
Then i'll accept it as an attempt to hide your inability to claim and direct my attention from it. Good day sir, you obviously have nothing.

You're the one who got offended when I never said your LSs name, I guess you can run away whenever you want.

I never even implied your LS, guilty consciences I guess.
 
meeze said:
You're the one who got offended when I never said your LSs name, I guess you can run away whenever you want.
It was a general statement to people who blame hax on thier inability to claim. Whether it be at fafnir, simurgh, or leaping lizzy. You first brought the attack apon my shell, to which i rebutted.
 
Marajade said:
No, you didnt. You came up with the cockamaimy(sp) story about it increasing your movement speed, and claimed that as your irrefutable proof.

You're a hack, begone already.
can you please say where i ever said thats what makes it detectable? i would LOVE to see that, Because i NEVER posted those words on this board ever. I said that it can make you run faster, I NEVER said it was the reason it was detectable
 
Marajade said:
It was a general statement to people who blame hax on thier inability to claim. Whether it be at fafnir, simurgh, or leaping lizzy. You first brought the attack apon my shell, to which i rebutted.

There are plenty of places where hackers run rampant, Mee Degi being one. If you show up there without hax, you might as well farm the yags for gil until you have enough for O. Kote.

Of course there will be the times when he will spawn near you, but a POSing Voke botting GS will probably win most claims down there.

When I first hit 50, me and my friend did Mee Degi. Back when he was on the platform against the DRG RMT crew. We won 9/12 claims, so I know it is possible. But with the lag of 100+ people the odds of beating a bot go down significantly.

I was in DA a few weeks ago, and Faf spawned about 10 feet away from me, he never showed up on my screen until I used /targetnpc and ran right up to him. He will have to be standing closer than 10 feet in order for me to have a shot at claiming.

I wouldn't mind trying, but trying to claim on the solo is retarded.
 
Chasym said:
can you please say where i ever said thats what makes it detectable? i would LOVE to see that, Because i NEVER posted those words on this board ever. I said that it can make you run faster, I NEVER said it was the reason it was detectable
Lets see here.
Chasym said:
if you think its bullshit thats your own loss. im not tryin to make you believe anything, but when i was into the behind the scenes ffxi stuff we found stuff like this.
it would be dumb to think they cannot detect something that hooks right into the ffxi process.
im not banned cause i havent broke any rules here.
but hey, your stance on what goes on with windower is your own.
Chasym said:
thats what i just said....
I said they can and do detect it but its illegal so they cant say they are detecting your use of windwer...thats exactly what i said. why is my statement of the same thing BS and his statement of the same thing not...*confused*
i never said they ban people specifically for windower, But it has happened to people who only use windower. Personal anti hack friends of mine banned on windower lite because of the speed bursts. If they banned you for windower they dont have to say it, they just gotta say third party programs, which is what they do anyway, and you cant do jack about it.
Chasym said:
they can detect windower, they do detect it. its a fact. They cannot legally detect it so they never wil say anything about you using itl, its a fact that people dont wanna believe. Gotta stop kidding yourselves, they will change their tos to allow this soon. its a popular misconception, but in my time with hacks and testing in a group, They do detect it. They cannot say they are detecting it currently, but that can change and i suspect it will with the new windower coming.
Chasym said:
being that the creators are not around anymore and have moved on being too busy coding for vista and what not, the new guys even have trouble putting the detectability and speed claims to rest, they cant give an exact answer on it from what i seen browsing around there.
I stopped going there when the original creators left and passed on the torch to someone else. cute to find a post about me over there too lol.

most people who use windower just download and use not knowing anything about it except that it windows and has plug ins, they didnt code it or care who did. They are just users, its been said before that while its there its barley noticeable. no reason for anyone to notice besides someone who looks for that thing, A GM.
SE has probly known longer (lol cant believe im sayin that) than any hacker i know of with that little thing.
its hard to be detected if no ones paying attention like i said.
and windower has always been a "use at your own risk" program.

and skaw i can see my comments are worthless to you since you called what i said BS and when someone said the same thing right after that it wasnt BS.
my actions may have dissolved my rep as a player, but what i state is true if you care to believe it or not, and if not i hope you end up in the situation that you claim you can sue your way out of. Because i just dont see that happening.
Thats the first 4 results searching your posts for the word "detect" and "detectable"

Your right, you didnt say it was because you ran fast. In those and the 7 others, you didnt say how they could at all, other than "they have ways"
 
your right, i never have and never will say how, Instead i gave the code from the program itself that was why.
 
meeze said:
There are plenty of places where hackers run rampant, Mee Degi being one. If you show up there without hax, you might as well farm the yags for gil until you have enough for O. Kote.

Of course there will be the times when he will spawn near you, but a POSing Voke botting GS will probably win most claims down there.

When I first hit 50, me and my friend did Mee Degi. Back when he was on the platform against the DRG RMT crew. We won 9/12 claims, so I know it is possible. But with the lag of 100+ people the odds of beating a bot go down significantly.

I was in DA a few weeks ago, and Faf spawned about 10 feet away from me, he never showed up on my screen until I used /targetnpc and ran right up to him. He will have to be standing closer than 10 feet in order for me to have a shot at claiming.

I wouldn't mind trying, but trying to claim on the solo is retarded.
Huh. I can see fafnir every time he spawns when i'm up there. Know why you see people spinning around? Because moving causes displayed characters to unload so it can load new ones. But, it always loads NPC models before PC models. So, just keep moving so that the game is constantly reloading character models, and bang, fafnir will be on your screen almost the moment he spawns.
Its a neat trick, completely legitimate, try it sometime. You can see it easily with darters, because whenever you move within a certain distance of them, they load.

There you go, i just told you the secret to claiming in the DA against bots.
 
Chasym said:
your right, i never have and never will say how, Instead i gave the code from the program itself that was why.
THEY HAVE WAYS! I wont tell you, but they have them! Beware!

You've just as much as Meez and his "hacking friend." Which is to say, not much at all.
 
Marajade said:
THEY HAVE WAYS! I wont tell you, but they have them! Beware!

You've just as much as Meez and his "hacking friend." Which is to say, not much at all.
believe what you want, I gave visual and exact proof of how which is better than any other way i could have put it. I didnt just say "they have ways" I gave the proof to follow.
but im tired of it always going back to things that have been done and passed. ive shown you, even opened up a proof revealing post from the OH private section that also contained that same discussion and code about the subject.
Its there, its done and over with and its always the same fight, "its ok because everyone else does it even if it is against the rules". Its tired
 
Chasym said:
"its ok because everyone else does it even if it is against the rules". Its tired
Did you just attempt to use the "you use windower, so I'm allowed to use fleehax" defence?

No ladies and gentlemen, it isnt legaly detectable, so you're free to go about your buisness.

You're right, the argument is over, just like every other time. However, much like MrPeregrine, you seem to think you won it when you're busy sinking into the pool of your own excrement.
 
Back
Top