Post your infractions!!! (mini-poll also)

Do you really care if you get an infraction?


  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
lol This is still goin on? XD I got a tape measurer if you guys want to compete on e-peen. Neither side is going to get anywhere with this debate. It's always like this every few months. Everyone wants to bitch. Simple fact is, none of this shit fuckin matters. You type in half-hearted words onto a fucking website over a stupid video game. The person with the best words wins? Hardly. The person who wastes the least amount of time with this shit wins, in my opinion. I really can't imagine anyone believing arguing on these fucking boards is actually worth the time put into the message.

Yes, I realize the hypocrisies in typing out this post.
 
lol This is still goin on? XD I got a tape measurer if you guys want to compete on e-peen. Neither side is going to get anywhere with this debate. It's always like this every few months. Everyone wants to bitch. Simple fact is, none of this shit fuckin matters. You type in half-hearted words onto a fucking website over a stupid video game. The person with the best words wins? Hardly. The person who wastes the least amount of time with this shit wins, in my opinion. I really can't imagine anyone believing arguing on these fucking boards is actually worth the time put into the message.

Yes, I realize the hypocrisies in typing out this post.

NO U!
 
lol This is still goin on? XD I got a tape measurer if you guys want to compete on e-peen. Neither side is going to get anywhere with this debate. It's always like this every few months. Everyone wants to bitch. Simple fact is, none of this shit fuckin matters. You type in half-hearted words onto a fucking website over a stupid video game. The person with the best words wins? Hardly. The person who wastes the least amount of time with this shit wins, in my opinion. I really can't imagine anyone believing arguing on these fucking boards is actually worth the time put into the message.

Yes, I realize the hypocrisies in typing out this post.

You lose because you're still not 75 NIN n00b.
 
lol This is still goin on? XD I got a tape measurer if you guys want to compete on e-peen. Neither side is going to get anywhere with this debate. It's always like this every few months. Everyone wants to bitch. Simple fact is, none of this shit fuckin matters. You type in half-hearted words onto a fucking website over a stupid video game. The person with the best words wins? Hardly. The person who wastes the least amount of time with this shit wins, in my opinion. I really can't imagine anyone believing arguing on these fucking boards is actually worth the time put into the message.

Yes, I realize the hypocrisies in typing out this post.
cool story bro
 
People's e-peens seem to turn blue once they get big enough. So the rumor IS true...
 
Here, how about this.

I vote we ban Garvin.

Why? Cause he refuses to accept Windower as okay, and the moment it comes up he begins to dogmatically cling to the idea that it is illegal and haxxor.

And since the masses all think it's stupid, his posts are stupid. And if the masses consider his posts stupid, thats a lot of offenses, which means he should be banned.

Suddenly it doesn't make sense to ban someone on the grounds that everyone considers what you wrote to not make sense, does it? How would you feel if you voiced an opinion everyone else disagreed with for their reasons, and you got an offense for it?

Or banned?

STFU, if QCDN has been around for as long as it is and still gets more than a hundred posts a day, and several new members a week, I think it's safe to say this forum is being well managed by the admin, and they're doing it wrong.

Until they stop banning sock puppets cause they're lazy, updates stop, new skins aren't released for years, people stop posting, a person can sit and spam a forum and no one will care, or the admin doesn't log in for a month just cause, you have absolutely no right to say the admin and mods are not doing their job.

You talked about the volunteer firefighters letting your house burn down? Maybe they should just stop volunteering when it comes to your account and sit back and WATCH your house burn down, instead of grabbing their houses and at least GODDAMN /trying/ to put it out.

Or perhaps they should charge a monthly fee so its actually worth their time.

Oh wait, is the admin even making a wage off this site? You want him to give up his life just to serve your every whim?

Jesus christ, gtfo, the admin and mods have lives too you know. Most other sites would have died long ago. I created my own forum a year ago, and it's been a trial keeping it alive, but it's still strong, and because of that all my members are thankful.

My hat's off to you admin and mods for having to deal with the constant needless shit, cause I know if I got this crap on my site from my members, I wouldn't have the patience and would end up just beating them over the heads with the ban stick.

Keep fighting the good fight.
 
Here, how about this.

I vote we ban Garvin.

Why? Cause he refuses to accept Windower as okay, and the moment it comes up he begins to dogmatically cling to the idea that it is illegal and haxxor.

And since the masses all think it's stupid, his posts are stupid. And if the masses consider his posts stupid, thats a lot of offenses, which means he should be banned.

Suddenly it doesn't make sense to ban someone on the grounds that everyone considers what you wrote to not make sense, does it? How would you feel if you voiced an opinion everyone else disagreed with for their reasons, and you got an offense for it?

Or banned?
Christ, some of you fuckers are morons, and honestly, I was waiting for someone to try this exact line of reasoning.

First of all, this line of thought leads to the fact that, since many people want rid of these shits, and you're defending them, that would mean, with that line of thought, that you be banned too, along with a lot of other people, which is fucking stupid. (Of course, since it's looking pretty straw man over there.)

Secondly of all, if I were posting in the manner of the people we were referring to, I would be posting in every single thread where windower is so much as mentioned, or any picture of someone using windower can be seen. This does not even remotely approach the level of things we are talking about in this thread.

Finally, on a not-quite-related-but-still-sort-of note, what I saw was inconsistency between the rule "No posting of cheat tools allowed." and Square-Enix's public statements of "Windower and all of its assorted plugins are prohibited." Frankly, I don't give a fuck if you or anyone else likes it, or wants to form an opinion on it. These are indisputable facts, and all I did was present them and question the inconsistency.

In summary, I think you need to take another look at things and actually try thinking things through before you run your fucking mouth off. We aren't talking about these people having "unpopular opinions". We're talking about them posting hypocrisy, misinformation, destroying legitimate intelligent conversation, and doing this on a widespread basis. You might find me irritating, but nothing I've done holds a candle to the three in question.

So kindly step off and go back to running your little shithole forum perfectly.
 
and you're defending them

Defending who? No my friend, you misinterpret what I say. I am neither saying what they do is right or wrong. They, like you, are dogmatically clinging to some idea or another. What it is? I have no idea. But simply banning them for sticking up for what they believe in is altogether silly. Spamming? Nope. Flame baiting? Nope.

If you really feel so strongly about this, put them on ignore, like the admin was kind enough to give you. If that's not enough, I'm sorry, you are beyond helping, end of story. You can;t expect everyone who so as much gets on your nerves to be instantly thrown out a window.

Frankly, I don't give a fuck if you or anyone else likes it, or wants to form an opinion on it. These are indisputable facts, and all I did was present them and question the inconsistency.


I see an inconsistency , can you see it?

I don't give a fuck

present them

If you didn't give a fuck, why the hell did you take the time to hunt down the article, copy and paste it in, and support it. that's like someone joining a debate team, presenting some solid facts, and solid facts they are, I admit, then later saying you actually didn't care about it.

Then are you saying you do it for fun? If so I applaud you, 'cause I myself actually rather enjoy debate.

But this:

So kindly step off and go back to running your little shit hole forum perfectly.

Is not debating. It's flame baiting. something you just condoned like 10 posts ago.

Here's what we're gonna do. I'm gonna ask questions, and if you wanna keep going and actually go all out and really debate with me, let's do it right. You will answer them yes or no. That's it. Yes. No. I don't know, those are the three answers you get to use. Not specifically those wordings, but your answer will be clear to all of us reading. I will number my questions. you will answer like so.

#1: yes

#2: no

And so on. If you refuse to follow these rules you accept the fact you don;t know how to properly debate a point, and are, in fact, just bored and trying to act superior through the anonymity of the internet.

After answering, underneath you may place your counter questions. I will answer as well. Then I will make points, and you will counter them. Capiche'?

Okay.

#1: Do you believe that people should be banned under the pretext that the larger number of people on the board believe they should, for reasons including, but not only, spamming, being annoying, posting points that seem crude, pointless, or stupid, in their own opinion that is.

#2: If so, if you found yourself being banned for this exact reason, would you submit?

#3: (to everyone but Garvin) Under these rules then, would Garvin be banned? Simply a Yay or Nay suffices.

#4: Do you consider the use of Azariel's windower to be unlawful, bad, hacking, wrong, under the grounds it is against POL's rules? even when they themselves simply have it there to cover their butts, and aside from that don't actually mind it?
 
#3: (to everyone but Garvin) Under these rules then, would Garvin be banned? Simply a Yay or Nay suffices.

#4: Do you consider the use of Azariel's windower to be unlawful, bad, hacking, wrong, under the grounds it is against POL's rules? even when they themselves simply have it there to cover their butts, and aside from that don't actually mind it?

#3 Nay, Simply put, sooner or later someone will get band for using these third party programs, and will then go on to bitch about it....


#4 I don't really get this question what do you mean by the italicized part? First of all it's been stated it's against their policy to use a windower other than the one they have supplied, it's in that interview somewhere....and the other part i don't get

thats my two cents
 
Defending who? No my friend, you misinterpret what I say. I am neither saying what they do is right or wrong. They, like you, are dogmatically clinging to some idea or another. What it is? I have no idea. But simply banning them for sticking up for what they believe in is altogether silly. Spamming? Nope. Flame baiting? Nope.
The fact that you have no idea just shows that you're willing to debate this without even looking things over first. I'll say this again, this isn't about someone having an unpopular opinion, especially since, in pchan's case, there aren't really opinions involved only incorrect facts. As has been said numerous times, this is only a problem because it's all over the goddamn place. There are a lot of people with a lot of opinions, many of which are just as unpopular including myself. Consider why there isn't a call to arms to have all of them banned.

If you really feel so strongly about this, put them on ignore, like the admin was kind enough to give you. If that's not enough, I'm sorry, you are beyond helping, end of story. You can;t expect everyone who so as much gets on your nerves to be instantly thrown out a window.
I have been doing that. However, it's not the solution, otherwise nobody would ever be banned, the only solution would be "lol ignore them".


I see an inconsistency , can you see it?
No, I can't. I was referring to the few posts I'd made in the windower thread. I didn't, don't, and have no plans to care whether or not people like to hear it. It's just a case where the truth seems to sting some people just a little. I don't know what inconsistency there is there, or what you thought I was referring to.

Is not debating. It's flame baiting. something you just condoned like 10 posts ago.
Look where we are, cry some fucking more.

As for your questions, shove them up your ass. If you want to ask me questions and let me answer them, I will. Otherwise don't feed me this "You must answer only yes or no" bullshit to try to reduce my opinion to a 1 or a 0. Capiche?
 
#3 Nay, Simply put, sooner or later someone will get band for using these third party programs, and will then go on to bitch about it....


#4 I don't really get this question what do you mean by the italicized part? First of all it's been stated it's against their policy to use a windower other than the one they have supplied, it's in that interview somewhere....and the other part i don't get

thats my two cents


I have never ever heard of someone being banned for using windower.

And the simple fact that SE copied it and even tossed in some of it's features goes to show they think it was a good idea, and wanted it to be available in a legit way, for us.

You really think SE came up with the auto-sort by themselves?

Nonetheless, rate up for some solid points that make sense, and the absence of pointless insults, unlike 95% of the other posts on the flame board.

Ahem ahem.
 
Look where we are, cry some fucking more.

So, cause it's on the flame board, hypocrisy is fine?

As for your questions, shove them up your ass. If you want to ask me questions and let me answer them, I will. Otherwise don't feed me this "You must answer only yes or no" bullshit to try to reduce my opinion to a 1 or a 0. Capiche?

All right Garvin. I'll give you more options to a yes or no question...

You can now answer with the phrases, pudding, larva, and tofu salad. Happy? XP
 
Just to clarify. Windower had Auto-Stack only. SE has Auto Sort which comes with stacking obviously. Theres a difference :P



I personally prefer stack only >_>
 
Just to clarify. Windower had Auto-Stack only. SE has Auto Sort which comes with stacking obviously. Theres a difference :P



I personally prefer stack only >_>


true, the random items getting shoved around can be annoying.

Nonetheless, I'm sure you understand what I meant.
 
So, cause it's on the flame board, hypocrisy is fine?
Still not following you.



All right Garvin. I'll give you more options to a yes or no question...

You can now answer with the phrases, pudding, larva, and tofu salad. Happy? XP

#1 tofu salad
#2 larva
#4 tofu salad
 
Will everyone please note that Garvin gave up after I made the solid counterpoints?

This is how you shut him up. He'll make a couple counter points of his own before giving up and replying things like larva and tofu salad to your points.

j/k

Anyways, was a decent debate with you garv, see you around.

Anyone else got some closing remarks before we go ahead and just let this one die? I think we've drug it out as much as we can.
 
The only closing thing I can say really is...

Demetri Martin rules. :thumbsup:


I'm pretty sure when you're saying things you know the community is going to get angry about, that's called trolling.

Sorry but I can't let the people on this board be convinced by this. Saying things you know people won't like isn't trolling, it's speaking your mind. What you meant to say was "saying things to delibrately provoke the community to anger is trolling". There's a big fucking difference and I just wanted to make sure you and everyone else caught that.
 
This poll needs both sides of the equation to be reduced in exhajuration.(sp)

I feel that it is neither the end of the world, however I don't 'not' care about them. They should be there IMO for warnings and stuff.
 
Back
Top