and you're defending them
Defending who? No my friend, you misinterpret what I say. I am neither saying what they do is right or wrong. They, like you, are dogmatically clinging to some idea or another. What it is? I have no idea. But simply banning them for sticking up for what they believe in is altogether silly. Spamming? Nope. Flame baiting? Nope.
If you really feel so strongly about this, put them on ignore, like the admin was kind enough to give you. If that's not enough, I'm sorry, you are beyond helping, end of story. You can;t expect everyone who so as much gets on your nerves to be instantly thrown out a window.
Frankly, I don't give a fuck if you or anyone else likes it, or wants to form an opinion on it. These are indisputable facts, and all I did was present them and question the inconsistency.
I see an inconsistency , can you see it?
If you didn't give a fuck, why the hell did you take the time to hunt down the article, copy and paste it in, and support it. that's like someone joining a debate team, presenting some solid facts, and solid facts they are, I admit, then later saying you actually didn't care about it.
Then are you saying you do it for fun? If so I applaud you, 'cause I myself actually rather enjoy debate.
But this:
So kindly step off and go back to running your little shit hole forum perfectly.
Is not debating. It's flame baiting. something you just condoned like 10 posts ago.
Here's what we're gonna do. I'm gonna ask questions, and if you wanna keep going and actually go all out and really debate with me, let's do it right. You will answer them yes or no. That's it. Yes. No. I don't know, those are the three answers you get to use. Not specifically those wordings, but your answer will be clear to all of us reading. I will number my questions. you will answer like so.
#1: yes
#2: no
And so on. If you refuse to follow these rules you accept the fact you don;t know how to properly debate a point, and are, in fact, just bored and trying to act superior through the anonymity of the internet.
After answering, underneath you may place your counter questions. I will answer as well. Then I will make points, and you will counter them. Capiche'?
Okay.
#1: Do you believe that people should be banned under the pretext that the larger number of people on the board believe they should, for reasons including, but not only, spamming, being annoying, posting points that seem crude, pointless, or stupid, in their own opinion that is.
#2: If so, if you found yourself being banned for this exact reason, would you submit?
#3: (to everyone but Garvin) Under these rules then, would Garvin be banned? Simply a Yay or Nay suffices.
#4: Do you consider the use of Azariel's windower to be unlawful, bad, hacking, wrong, under the grounds it is against POL's rules?
even when they themselves simply have it there to cover their butts, and aside from that don't actually mind it?