Rape Tunnel

Celvantes

Genkai Conqueror
Adventurer
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
2,864
Age
43
Location
Oklahoma
Main Job
Paladin-Male
Secondary Job
Dragoon-Male
Third Job
Dancer-Male
Server
Quetzalcoatl
Linkshell
RoyalKnights
FFXIV
Celvantes
... seriously, it's a freaking rape tunnel:

http://forbesavenue.com/2009/09/30/the-rape-tunnel-no-seriously/

What is art? Are we art? Is “art” art?
- Lisa Turtle, Saved By The Bell
Things are kinda crazy in Ohio. Richard Whitehouse, an “artist” is making a wonderful, interactive art piece known as The Rape Tunnel. What is it? Its a tunnel…you walk through it, and then the guy tries to rape you at the end. Um…pretty artistic stuff. More from I Heart Chaos,
This is a follow up to his “Punch You in the Face Tunnel”, where predictably, you would get punched in the face at the end. He’s still getting sued over that one.
At ArtLurker, Whitehouse explains the motivation behind this work, that has both feminists and law enforcement a little nervous:
(Why rape?) Because as an artistic gesture, it’s one of the most impactful I can think of. For the past ten years Ohio’s art scene has been largely centered around a string of alternative spaces in Akron’s warehouse district, where people had been putting on art shows. At the beginning I happily participated along with everyone else but then I started to feel like it wasn’t going anywhere. It dawned on me that if the work we created had never existed the world would be no different than if it had. None of it mattered to anyone outside of our small and insignificant circle of peers. I wanted something that would have more impact.
I started to think differently about my work. In 2007 at the Seward Projects Space in Columbus, I had my first breakthrough with an installation that was to be the prototype for this current one. It was called THE PUNCH-YOU-IN-THE-FACE TUNNEL. It was the same set-up as THE RAPE TUNNEL except at the end of the tunnel I’d punch the subject in the face instead of raping him or her. The impetus was completely reactionary to the current state of art, and motivated by pure frustration.
As it turns out, I ended up breaking the nose of the third person to crawl through the tunnel, an aspiring model. She went to the hospital and eventually sued me. Her modeling career was put on hold. The civil case was long and drawn out and the matter still hasn’t been resolved. To this day she still has unpaid medical bills. The point of this long aside is that all this took place two years ago, and I’m still having an impact on this young lady’s life, something not many other artists could claim about their work.
Rape seemed like the next logical step.
​
So…who’s dumber. The guy who is so overly artistic that he made a rape tunnel, or the people dumb enough to walk through “THE RAPE TUNNEL” only to be raped by the artist.
Random Question: So…if a bunch of people walk through at once…is that dude just seriously getting his rape on? Does he make people stop and wait in line to get raped? Yeah…

Is it art if, in self-defense, I kill the guy at the end? 'cause that's what I'd do in real life if someone tried to rape me...
 
well if i were him i would make them sign some sort of waiver that explains what is going to happen, then you cant be sued because they signed for it.
 
lol I don't think any kind of waiver is going to stand.

This.Is.Weird.

I have a couple artsy friends, and they go out of their way to live up to the eccentric stereotype. But this.. no.
 
Dumbass said:
To this day she still has unpaid medical bills. The point of this long aside is that all this took place two years ago, and I’m still having an impact on this young lady’s life, something not many other artists could claim about their work.

This is the part that gets me. Just a heads up, it wasn't your art that impacted her life, it was your FIST.
 
I like they way it used the term "getting his rape on" I shouldn't laugh, but I did.

But yeh, what a stupid twat.
 
... so this is how its done... i must start immediately on my superhero supermodel gangbang tunnel.

in the name of all that is Artsy!!!! Dejavu away!

Spoiler is NSFW...
Spoiler:
body_art_superhero_spiderman.jpg

body_art_superhero_superman.jpg

superhero_body_paint_ms_marvel0.JPG

superhero_body_paint_poison_ivy.JPG


...Don't judge me
 
... seriously, it's a freaking rape tunnel:

http://forbesavenue.com/2009/09/30/the-rape-tunnel-no-seriously/

Is it art if, in self-defense, I kill the guy at the end? 'cause that's what I'd do in real life if someone tried to rape me...
What the fuck. Someone is going to kill that guy, and he'll have brought it all on himself. What a sick son of a bitch. If you're going to be a bat shit crazy artist, can't you just cut your ear off or something? I don't understand people who think that being remembered/known as a monster or asswad or general fucking idiot is better than not being remembered/known at all.

well if i were him i would make them sign some sort of waiver that explains what is going to happen, then you cant be sued because they signed for it.
It wouldn't really be rape if they consented to it... Can't rape the willing and all that...
 
The point of this long aside is that all this took place two years ago, and I’m still having an impact on this young lady’s life, something not many other artists could claim about their work.
Rape seemed like the next logical step.
I'd like to know what train of logic this guy rides on.

Also, Celv, it's artistic expression if you make it so that the blood that exits his body when you kill him is sprayed in an artistic way. Maybe say it looks like a bunny, or Jesus.
 
This is why I have ambivalent feelings about government funded art.
 
Is it art if, in self-defense, I kill the guy at the end?

I think it would still be art at that point, since it would still be an interactive medium. If he's got any brains at all, he'll have a contingency set up so that it becomes "The Attempted Rape Tunnel" if he's killed.
 
Art is wide open to interpretation that anything can be qualified to be defined as art.

I never thought of the expression of rape.
 
I wonder what went through this guy's head.

I mean, if people aren't affected by your art, maybe you should, you know, become a better artist? I wouldn't call this art. Nor would I call the crazy person who set up 10 mixers in a row, each with a goldfish in them, and a button that says "DO NOT PUSH" is art. Nor would I call the naked person with a dog collar attempting to bite people art.

Well, tbh, by definition they are art, but there's gotta be a line drawn somewhere as to what is acceptable...
 
I wonder if when traveling through this tunnel... when you get to the end if you welcome your assailant, would the artist get all pissy because you turned his "Rape Tunnel" into a "Consensual Anonymous Sex Tunnel"

We should send Miros to find out.
 
Alternately, one could send through an angry prisoner named Bubba, and give new meaning to the "Rape Tunnel".

I suppose the name of the piece would still apply though. Just not the way the "artist" expected.
 
IDK, I'm kinda tempted to walk in so i can kick him in the nuts then punch him in the face and see if he liked my kind of "art". I would call it "Knight takes Pawn"
 
Alternately, one could send through an angry prisoner named Bubba, and give new meaning to the "Rape Tunnel".

I suppose the name of the piece would still apply though. Just not the way the "artist" expected.

He would probably just be forced to rename it the "Irapeyou-tunnel" then he could press charges against you for screwing up his art.
 
We all just got told.
 
Back
Top