Screw you SE, will never buy another SE game

not spend spend.
Click to expand...

Actually, the more the economy spends(not saying to buy needless items)...the better the economy actually is.

The more a company gets income from their customers, the more inclined they are to lower their prices. Because they're getting much more profit they can afford lower prices.

However if something is in high demand, it will most likely increase in value nonstop. Sort of how Gas does. Even tho they recieve billions of dollars a year for gas purchases/Oil...you have yet to see decent Gas Prices anymore. Heck it's $5.25 a gallon here in Indiana in some places.

But, if a company is not getting profit they have to do one of 2 things: Either cut their losses and under cut their items to sell and get rid of it...

Or Make the price higher, to compensate for the time it takes to sell it/compensate for the money they have not yet profited on/obtained. If I am wrong please correct me, I don't entirely believe the last statement I made. But I feel that's how it happens.

As for the Bush and Clinton Debate...

Bush, imo is semi-stubbern on how he is doing everything, and the lack of what happened during the hurricane. It took alot of time to even consider helping alot of the people down there.

They had several trailers waiting for alot of people who needed them, yet they refused to send them out-having thousands of trailers in places.(I think they were there for the Katrina Cause specifically)

Clinton...Kept alot of this Nation's at peace, I can least give him credit for that. Made alot of treaties during his time in office as well. But his affairs he had known publicly wasn't really a good thing fo rhim to do either. To each his own, I didn't approve of the actions, but it dragging on and on just because he was president was kinda stupid.

And you can blame Bush for alot of things in this War, however preventing the war wouldn't stay forever. Just the fact they decide to Bomb the Towers at the time Bush went into Office.

He was right on making War with them, I would agree with it...however...I don't completely agree on how he is managing the War. The countries over there have fought and killed each other for thousands of years. Us trying to make them play nice, is only going to make them dislike us more.

But we can't really help it either, sooner or later, if it got out of hand it would just move to the USA and we'd have to settle with it then. But at least the government is getting in good shape over there...and I think(dont quote me)...Turning into a partial Democracy? Civilized, but the country itself needs the same thing. Hope for a good civilized country in the future. Maybe even have good trades and make it one of the best people to trade/barter with as well.

Who knows. ^^
 
Ryujin said:
Do u think maybe the way the economy is in the shits is because people don't know how to manage there money. Iraq is a huge part of the problem, The war on drugs is another problem. Also many Americans don't know how to conserve gas, money and not spend spend.

I think bushes failed policys did not help nor the Feds cutting intrest rates left and right.
Click to expand...

Bush has 0 control over the cutting of interest rates. The Fed is a private bank that controls money supply, money distribution, and interest rates.

So you just admitted that people aren't fiscally responsible so why should we give them free health insurance? The war has no influence on the economy since Iraq doesn't have the oil supply you think it does. I believe Iraq is 7th on manufacturing of sweet and sour crude oil. Also the war fund has no influence on the economy since well the government doesn't run the economy so it's not like they're misappropriating funds that would go into running the economy for the war. The only influence government has is subsidies, the insurance on bank accounts, they have some hand in mutual funds but that is a way for people to have a safe low risk way to invest their money with some interest rates.
 
romperstomper said:
Since signing China into the WTO the US has changed from a manufacturing to service industry. Do you really think that people can live off of minimum wage where it is right now? I know Clinton isn't to completely blame, but he holds good part of the blame because people were blind to the long run. Sure theoretically its all great and Clinton isn't responsible for the Fed drastically cutting interest rates and control the money supply.
Click to expand...

People weren't being blind in the long wrong. It takes a huge amount of extra money for goods to be produced in the US. Comparative advantage comes in to play here. If prices were really adjusted for CoP than minimum wage would be plenty for people to live off of. What's theoretical about any of this, lol. Clinton isn't responsible for the Fed cutting interest rates. I don't make a huge amount over minimum wage for how long i've been working, and i'm already almost ready to buy my own house.
 
Make, you have the power, don't you? Cleave this thread in two with that shiny Algol of yours.
 
I was trying to ignore the post asking for that, because its a pain in the butt to split threads, but since you put it like that i'll start working on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top