Atheism

I'm sorry, but you're both wrong.

The actual birthday of Jesus was forgotten. So they originally celebrated it on Najuary 6th, April 21st and May 1st. However, during the 4th centurary, the church chose to celebrate it at the winter solastice, though, which occurs on December 21st. Astrologists had discovered that on December 25th, daytime had become noticable longer. Thus, this date is the one most pagan religions use to celebrate the rebirth of the sun.

Yes, they did chose it from pagan sources. So far you're right. It is not, however, only there to celebreate Mithra. Mithra also isn't a Roman goddess.

in Roman pagan religion, you celebrate Attis. His birthday were on December 25th, and he was sacrificed in order to bring salvation to mankind. On March 22, after havng been cruicified on a tree, he died and descended for three days to Underworld. His image were then tied to a tree on "Black Friday", and were carried to the temple, where his folowers would eat him in the form of bread. Oh, the irony.

in Greek pagan religion, Dionysus were also born on December 25th. He were the son of Zeus, the king of gods, and were mainly celebrated in Jerusalem. He, too, were worshipped by symbolically eating his flesh and blood.

In Egyptian pagan religion, Osiris is known as the sun god. All of the Egyptian kings were considered Osiris sun, untill later when they got demoted. But that's another topic. Anyway, three wise men would announce his rebirth, and his followers would eat cakes which symbolized his body.

In Persian pagan religion, Mithra were a persian saviour. While yes, they did worship her throughout the roman empire, they also did that with Osiris and several other religions. The romans were, opposed to popular belief, rather split in their beliefs. Mithraism were a strong competitor to Christianity untill 3rd century. Anyway, Mithra were, originally a persian religion. Their god were born on Dec 25th, and his birth were witnessed by sheepheards and gift-carying magicians. He's also thought to be born from a virgin, and during his life, he's said to have performed many miracles. Some examples are; curing illnesses, and bring out devils which possessed people. He celebrated a last supper with his 12 disciples, and ascended to heaven during the spring equinox March 21st.

Can anyone else see why I don't think the bible is trustworthy?
 
Uzor said:
I'm sorry, but you're both wrong.

The actual birthday of Jesus was forgotten. So they originally celebrated it on Najuary 6th, April 21st and May 1st. However, during the 4th centurary, the church chose to celebrate it at the winter solastice, though, which occurs on December 21st. Astrologists had discovered that on December 25th, daytime had become noticable longer. Thus, this date is the one most pagan religions use to celebrate the rebirth of the sun.

Yes, they did chose it from pagan sources. So far you're right. It is not, however, only there to celebreate Mithra. Mithra also isn't a Roman goddess.

in Roman pagan religion, you celebrate Attis. His birthday were on December 25th, and he was sacrificed in order to bring salvation to mankind. On March 22, after havng been cruicified on a tree, he died and descended for three days to Underworld. His image were then tied to a tree on "Black Friday", and were carried to the temple, where his folowers would eat him in the form of bread. Oh, the irony.

in Greek pagan religion, Dionysus were also born on December 25th. He were the son of Zeus, the king of gods, and were mainly celebrated in Jerusalem. He, too, were worshipped by symbolically eating his flesh and blood.

In Egyptian pagan religion, Osiris is known as the sun god. All of the Egyptian kings were considered Osiris sun, untill later when they got demoted. But that's another topic. Anyway, three wise men would announce his rebirth, and his followers would eat cakes which symbolized his body.

In Persian pagan religion, Mithra were a persian saviour. While yes, they did worship her throughout the roman empire, they also did that with Osiris and several other religions. The romans were, opposed to popular belief, rather split in their beliefs. Mithraism were a strong competitor to Christianity untill 3rd century. Anyway, Mithra were, originally a persian religion. Their god were born on Dec 25th, and his birth were witnessed by sheepheards and gift-carying magicians. He's also thought to be born from a virgin, and during his life, he's said to have performed many miracles. Some examples are; curing illnesses, and bring out devils which possessed people. He celebrated a last supper with his 12 disciples, and ascended to heaven during the spring equinox March 21st.

Can anyone else see why I don't think the bible is trustworthy?

oldschool
but this date is not true as any other because when the calendar shifted, it shifted by 12 days, so it was actually Dec. 25 and then it got changed to Jan. 6th by the shift. If I remember correctly. Bible was written by a bunch of people, do you find many books with that many errors in them trustworthy?
 
No, that was my point.

Bible have many errors in it. It have also blantly stolen from many other religions.

I don't see what your point is though as you basically seem to agree with me in your last post =/
 
This thread is a monument to pseudo-intellectualism and would-be philosophers/theologians.

<3

Hi.

I still like my idea of putting this thread aside and making s'mores.

-.-

This thread isn't going to end b/c you're all dead set in what you believe and cling to those opinions quite tightly.

Bethany: Having beliefs isn't good?

Rufus: I think it's better to have ideas. You can change an idea. Changing a belief is trickier. Life should malleable and progressive; working from idea to idea permits that. Beliefs anchor you to certain points and limit growth; new ideas can't generate. Life becomes stagnant.

Dogma ftw.
 
Uzor said:
No, that was my point.

Bible have many errors in it. It have also blantly stolen from many other religions.

I don't see what your point is though as you basically seem to agree with me in your last post =/

I was agreeing with you lol, I meant it like... wouldn't you expect something written by a bunch of old doods have errors in it, it was like rhetorical question
 
People take the Bible (as well as other writings of other religions) far too literally. The Bible is full of descriptives and icons. Just like the way Jesus taught, the Bible is more parable so people can get a better understanding.

To 'bash' other peoples religions (whether you are Atheist or not) is completely unacceptable. It's no different than being racist imo. You can't expect people to tolerate you when you have no tolerance for them.
 
Lecreuset said:
This thread is a monument to pseudo-intellectualism and would-be philosophers/theologians.

<3

Hi.

Dogma ftw.

*wave!*

Sup, it's a good thread either way
 
Mirewen said:
To 'bash' other peoples religions (whether you are Atheist or not) is completely unacceptable. It's no different than being racist imo. You can't expect people to tolerate you when you have no tolerance for them.

No, it's not like racism at all. Making fun of someone because they are black, mexican, or whatever is unacceptable. You do not have a choice what race you are, but you do have a choice when it comes down to whether or not you believe in religion. So making fun of someone who is still hanging on to bronze-age myths as real fact when faced with overwhelming scientific evidence otherwise, is perfectly acceptable.

No one is born a christian, or born a muslim or whatever. There are no christian children, and there are no muslim children. Parents of these children push their own personal beliefs onto their children, it's called "paternal Indoctrination". It happens all the time everywhere. You always listen and learn from your parents. Children simply are not old enough to make a rational choice to whether or not they believe in religion. They lack life experiences and facts to make a real decision.

So if you are an educated intellegent adult, and you have seriously weighed all the evidence and thought about all aspects regarding religion, and still think that it is the absolute truth, even though there are mountains of scientific evidence proving otherwise, then you had better be ready to be made fun of.
 
I said "imo". It is MY opinion. And I'm not saying it is the exact same thing, I'm saying it is about tolerance. You don't want to believe in anything? Good for you. Don't expect me to agree with your life choice because it isn't mine.
 
Some people just need time, or some type of "moment of clarity" (cue Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction) before they know what they want to believe.
 
Telling someone they are wrong for a choice they have made for themselves is what is ignorant. I would never tell someone they have chosen the wrong religion because I might be wrong in my choice. How completely pompous would you have to be to tell someone "I am right and you are wrong"? When, quite frankly, no one knows for sure.
 
/wave hi2u Khidir ;P

I suppose.

Still I have the feelin' someone's gonna lose it. -.-
 
Mirewen said:
Telling someone they are wrong for a choice they have made for themselves is what is ignorant. I would never tell someone they have chosen the wrong religion because I might be wrong in my choice. How completely pompous would you have to be to tell someone "I am right and you are wrong"? When, quite frankly, no one knows for sure.

No one have said they're right or wrong in this thread. I assume you're direting your claims towards me. But I didn't once say anyone is wrong. I've just argued for my own oppinion. Why I chose not to eb a christian. That's not claiming anyone is wrong.
 
Mirewen said:
Telling someone they are wrong for a choice they have made for themselves is what is ignorant. I would never tell someone they have chosen the wrong religion because I might be wrong in my choice. How completely pompous would you have to be to tell someone "I am right and you are wrong"? When, quite frankly, no one knows for sure.

I totally agree with you kitty.

Live and let live I say!
 
Uzor said:
I'm sorry, but you're both wrong.

The actual birthday of Jesus was forgotten. So they originally celebrated it on Najuary 6th, April 21st and May 1st. However, during the 4th centurary, the church chose to celebrate it at the winter solastice, though, which occurs on December 21st. Astrologists had discovered that on December 25th, daytime had become noticable longer. Thus, this date is the one most pagan religions use to celebrate the rebirth of the sun.

Yes, they did chose it from pagan sources. So far you're right. It is not, however, only there to celebreate Mithra. Mithra also isn't a Roman goddess.

in Roman pagan religion, you celebrate Attis. His birthday were on December 25th, and he was sacrificed in order to bring salvation to mankind. On March 22, after havng been cruicified on a tree, he died and descended for three days to Underworld. His image were then tied to a tree on "Black Friday", and were carried to the temple, where his folowers would eat him in the form of bread. Oh, the irony.

in Greek pagan religion, Dionysus were also born on December 25th. He were the son of Zeus, the king of gods, and were mainly celebrated in Jerusalem. He, too, were worshipped by symbolically eating his flesh and blood.

In Egyptian pagan religion, Osiris is known as the sun god. All of the Egyptian kings were considered Osiris sun, untill later when they got demoted. But that's another topic. Anyway, three wise men would announce his rebirth, and his followers would eat cakes which symbolized his body.

In Persian pagan religion, Mithra were a persian saviour. While yes, they did worship her throughout the roman empire, they also did that with Osiris and several other religions. The romans were, opposed to popular belief, rather split in their beliefs. Mithraism were a strong competitor to Christianity untill 3rd century. Anyway, Mithra were, originally a persian religion. Their god were born on Dec 25th, and his birth were witnessed by sheepheards and gift-carying magicians. He's also thought to be born from a virgin, and during his life, he's said to have performed many miracles. Some examples are; curing illnesses, and bring out devils which possessed people. He celebrated a last supper with his 12 disciples, and ascended to heaven during the spring equinox March 21st.

Can anyone else see why I don't think the bible is trustworthy?

The rome bit was simply a joke because the actual spelling and details escaped me a little. (When in Rome ... aka when on a FFXI board.)Other than that much obliged for something a little more substantial then my faded recollection :)
 
Hey Mokk, I remembered that thread you were talking about finally, this is why I didn't argu with you about it. When it comes to religion people are gonna believe what they wanna believe, there's no point. And thanks for copying my avatar slightly, bitch.

Mirewen said:
People take the Bible (as well as other writings of other religions) far too literally. The Bible is full of descriptives and icons. Just like the way Jesus taught, the Bible is more parable so people can get a better understanding.

To 'bash' other peoples religions (whether you are Atheist or not) is completely unacceptable. It's no different than being racist imo. You can't expect people to tolerate you when you have no tolerance for them.

Thank-you.

Mirewen said:
Telling someone they are wrong for a choice they have made for themselves is what is ignorant. I would never tell someone they have chosen the wrong religion because I might be wrong in my choice. How completely pompous would you have to be to tell someone "I am right and you are wrong"? When, quite frankly, no one knows for sure.

I agree that it's wrong to tell someone of different beliefs 'I'm right you're wrong', but I think it's perfectly fine to believe that, as long as you don't shove it down someone's throat. You can believe you're right and everyone else is wrong and still respect them and their choice.
 
Last edited:
Excalibr said:
Hey Mokk, I remembered that thread you were talking about finally, this is why I didn't argu with you about it. When it comes to religion people are gonna believe what they wanna believe, there's no point. And thanks for copying my avatar slightly, bitch.

Lmao, i didn't even notice. I grabbed the pic off brawl-hall because i thought it'd make a great avatar at some point. Miros stuck it on me when i said i was going to head my posts with it from now on.

Mine's better tho, it moves. I r more exlicit... er:ph34r:

You need a
Drugs.gif
somewhere in your profile, ya ask me... :crazy:
 
RoM said:
when i said i was going to head my posts with it from now on.
And stealing words right out of my mouth! 4th post down
http://qcdn.org/showthread.php?t=39904&page=36

I saved your avatar....just in case I have to use it on another thread somewhere....your gif lies though, pot isn't a drug, it's a straight up plant.....don't give me that look >.>; it is, drugs are manmade, pot was given to me by God himself
 
Excalibr said:
And stealing words right out of my mouth! 4th post down
http://qcdn.org/showthread.php?t=39904&page=36

I saved your avatar....just in case I have to use it on another thread somewhere....your gif lies though, pot isn't a drug, it's a straight up plant.....don't give me that look >.>; it is, drugs are manmade, pot was given to me by God himself

Jesus it's uncanny. :shok: I have to go lie down. :16suspect1:

Preachin' to the choir on the rest of it, i just like the bouncey ball. I think we're all as aware as we're gonna get around here.
 
Back
Top