"Expanding" Endgame Linkshells

WE DON"T ENFORCE DYNAMIS... and a dedicated member is someone who can attend a majority of the events in this case this person was not ready for all of the hours we put in doing end game events. Why have people in a shell that do not do events with the shell? We are not a social LS we do events and if someone is not ready for that they can drop the pearl and we understand. We are still currently friends with the person that dropped his pearl we understand that he's not ready and he understands that by him being in our shell and not being productive that there's no reason for him to be in there.

Ok. See the bolded parts?

Dedicated or not, it was initially a sky shell to begin with which decided to expand into dynamis. Sure it'd be great if everyone in the sky LS dropped their current dynamis LSs to jump onto yours. That'd be ideal, no?

People will show their dedication if they show up; this part is true.
However, if they CANNOT fit the dynamis time slot into their RL schedules then that poses a problem to you and the members, does it not?

If some people cannot fit your dynamis schedule in, does that make them any less dedicated than those who do make it to sky and dynamis?
Are you going to favor those who can make it to both events when it was only 1 venue in the first place?
 
I know exactly who left Encore to run with us. I will give you a clue Rappa the points wasn't the reason they left.

Aza probably left because I talked about him having hacks on the forums and he got grilled about it, even though I never mentioned his name.

Meikolia probably because she found out Heralds gaiters dont drop in dynamis and wouldn't be able to fund the rest of her GS adventures.
 
I honestly don't know why you're complaining about Perseverance in this flame. Perseverance seem to actually do it in a good way. If there was no choice about, I would have lost all of the Perseverance members in my Dynamis LS. But I have people still coming.

Although I suppose it could be partly due to time zone issues. Those people might not be able to attend their Dynamis. I somewhat doubt it, though, as a few are NA.
 
Because you seem to continue ignoring this Rone, here it is again. Are you just not responding because its correct?

How many times must I say this... WE "ASKED" MEMBERS TO MIGRATE if they do or don't its UP TO THAT MEMBER. AS far as the shell goes we can use the extra people but we will live without it. We will not and have not discriminated against people who do dynamis with other shells. And yes a member can still be considered being dedicated without doing dynamis with us. We have members who do all other events but dynamis with us because of either our schedule conflicts with theirs or they have other responsibilities with other shells and yet those people are still considered dedicated and part of the team.
 
If some people cannot fit your dynamis schedule in, does that make them any less dedicated than those who do make it to sky and dynamis?
Are you going to favor those who can make it to both events when it was only 1 venue in the first place?

Our general rule has always been RL > FF. If you're schedule conflicts or don't have the time it's understandable. Members can still be dedicated if they only do events but not dynamis.

The whole dedication issue wasn't even about dynamis IT was about 1-2 people exp'n or goofing off during a scheduled event and deciding to come late making 90% of our members wait for them. These actions of aggreeing to be part of a shell and doing events during the scheduled event and having your fellow members wait for you shows disrespect and shows your undedicated nature to your fellow members.
 
Rofl, you dodged it yet again and you continue saying the same thing. Learn to read, and learn to comprehend what you read.

In simple format for you:

You stated that if members were not going to be able to be committed, that they should drop their pearl.

The only reason you would NEED to even say this in the first place, would be to express that "committed" means attending the majority of events, which now includes your Dynamis.


So...


That would imply, that members who do not attend your Dynamis, are not going to be considered committed and should drop their pearls.

And wait before you disagree, because again with my first point....
What would of been the purpose to tell members that if they can not be committed, they should drop their pearls.... if they were already committed to being with? Hmm?

If your LS was fine before you created Dynamis, then you have no reason to even say something like this because those players would of been considered committed right? So this statment that your leaders made, is encouraging them to participate in your new event of Dynamis so that they can be considered "committed" because otherwise, they should drop their pearl.
 
Oh my initial post wasn't really directed towards anyone lol.
I was only expressing my opinion on the matter based on what I did read.

My understanding on the matter is that some people are frustrated due to the loss of their core members for dynamis because of the LSs expanding and giving members an ultimatum.

I can understand their frustration because I've seen it myself.
Because of the sudden decrease in numbers, it means that the LS will have to recruit, and go through some runs in order to get everyone's gears running smoothly again.
 
Rofl, you dodged it yet again and you continue saying the same thing. Learn to read, and learn to comprehend what you read.

In simple format for you:

You stated that if members were not going to be able to be committed, that they should drop their pearl.

The only reason you would NEED to even say this in the first place, would be to express that "committed" means attending the majority of events, which now includes your Dynamis.


So...


That would imply, that members who do not attend your Dynamis, are not going to be considered committed and should drop their pearls.

And wait before you disagree, because again with my first point....
What would of been the purpose to tell members that if they can not be committed, they should drop their pearls.... if they were already committed to being with? Hmm?

If your LS was fine before you created Dynamis, then you have no reason to even say something like this because those players would of been considered committed right? So this statment that your leaders made, is encouraging them to participate in your new event of Dynamis so that they can be considered "committed" because otherwise, they should drop their pearl.

Read the above about the whole dedication issue. It was not directed towards people who can or can't make it to dynamis. It was directed towards those few who make others wait and wastes time. Ie. exp'n during an event, or just sitting around doing nothing but chatting.
 
Read the above about the whole dedication issue. It was not directed towards people who can or can't make it to dynamis. It was directed towards those few who make others wait and wastes time. Ie. exp'n during an event, or just sitting around doing nothing but chatting.


I would believe that, except that you would have no need to mention that extra "tid bit" (non-committed members should drop their pearl) in this topic if it was regarding dedication issues with other events. You were the one that brought it up, and you could of kept it to yourself if it wasn't regarding the new Dynamis you had created.

And actually, if there's only a problem with one or two members wouldn't it be normal for a leader to speak with them directly if the rest of your group already understands the concept of being responsible with their commitments?

You've contradicted yourself already, and everything that you have said just proves that this flame is valid, and that's where I stand.
 
Our general rule has always been RL > FF. If you're schedule conflicts or don't have the time it's understandable. Members can still be dedicated if they only do events but not dynamis.

The whole dedication issue wasn't even about dynamis IT was about 1-2 people exp'n or goofing off during a scheduled event and deciding to come late making 90% of our members wait for them. These actions of aggreeing to be part of a shell and doing events during the scheduled event and having your fellow members wait for you shows disrespect and shows your undedicated nature to your fellow members.

Alright, this quote I can agree to and understand the idea behind the "dropping the pearl."
I just don't think you clarified that earlier when you first jumped into the thread, I stand corrected if I am wrong.
 
Read the above about the whole dedication issue. It was not directed towards people who can or can't make it to dynamis. It was directed towards those few who make others wait and wastes time. Ie. exp'n during an event, or just sitting around doing nothing but chatting.

Why bring that up when we were talking about Dynamis, then? It sounds to me like you just got in a sticky situation and need ot find a way out of it.
 
Why bring that up when we were talking about Dynamis, then? It sounds to me like you just got in a sticky situation and need ot find a way out of it.

The only reason I even brought up dedication was because I was accused of threathening to break pearls BUT during the meeting about dynamis etc we also talked about tardyness jumping between those two subjects an officer said "If you're not dedicated drop your pearl" which was aimed towards those who show no respect for others time.

I brought it up to make it clear i never threathened to break anyone's pearl by doing dynamis with other shells. and that MEMBERS COULD have mis-interpreted that comment as directed towards dynamis. As the person who made the comment has in all seriously trouble explaning himself I've just played with him long enough and knew who he was directing that comment to.

And when we address LS issues we do not speak to individulas directly most of the time we talk in out in the LS so everyone that's there knows and understands the situation. We try and let everyone to get they're opinions in on the matter at hand.
 
The only reason I even brought up dedication was because I was accused of threathening to break pearls BUT during the meeting about dynamis etc we also talked about tardyness jumping between those two subjects an officer said "If you're not dedicated drop your pearl" which was aimed towards those who show no respect for others time.

I brought it up to make it clear i never threathened to break anyone's pearl by doing dynamis with other shells. and that MEMBERS COULD have mis-interpreted that comment as directed towards dynamis. As the person who made the comment has in all seriously trouble explaning himself I've just played with him long enough and knew who he was directing that comment to.

And when we address LS issues we do not speak to individulas directly most of the time we talk in out in the LS so everyone that's there knows and understands the situation. We try and let everyone to get they're opinions in on the matter at hand.

Misinterpretation and reading between the lines are two entirely different things, the fact that you blatently said we want dedication vs skipping out on events was clarified when you said we want you all to be in our dynamis linkshell IE. when you said you wanted people to be in epitomes linkshell. This was stated here as well as when a friend of mine told me about your linkshell's meeting.

Meeze i appologize for bringing Vang in, it was inappropriate and was trying to just make a point.
 
Did I say that things were bad? Show me where I said things in your shell were bad. But since you want to come at me like that you might want to talk to her.


Just came across that way to me given how defensive Pers members have been in this thread. I apologize if I misinterpreted.

To the thread itself, I think people are missing the big picture. Sure, the latest trend in dynamis lately has been more internal/closed shells popping up
and it seems like only they are getting targeted. What might be a problem on the grander scale is the overall number of dynamis shells in general. For the internal shells that are having great success, good for them. I can't blame them for wanting to go that route especially if they have the backing from within.

The only thing that gets to me is having to see more and more shells pop up on the scheduling forums and even worse, shells interrupt runs that don't have the common courtesy to post their schedules at all, especially when members there are active on QCDN.

I've had members of Pers and members of Fury leave my shell to participate in their own. I will never go on record to say that I liked having to see maybe a few of those people go, but what I can say is that I was aware of the situation ahead of time. A couple members of Pers told me months before that they were in plans to do their own dynamis. Unfortunately with Fury I had found out myself and really got no explanation until I started asking questions. I've had members "taken" (as people put it) on two occasions. I don't think anyone ever left for Epitome. On the other hand, I know what its like to be considered as someone who was accused of putting a gun to people's heads. Thankfully that declaration was made public on here and defended more than necessary.

At the end of the day, what can you really do? It sucks that I have to schedule with 5 other shells on tuesday nights and it sucks that new shells keep popping up, making more clutter in the scheduling and then breaking in a few months just for another one to pop up. This thread is quite pointless and a neverending battle.

I don't care that people think I'm in it for a cash cow. I have maybe sponsered 5 or 6 runs in my last two years. I don't care people think I'm a loot whore when I have only half the high level jobs as my members do. I'm there for the reason to be there with my friends and to have fun. I'm there to try my damndest to get my tanks shadow mantles some day and I'm there for those people that just want to beat DL. I will be there when Damita gets his Aegis and Mak finishes his axe. I don't really care if the three people from Fury's shell happen to all be officers and I really don't care if its the same way with Pers. If they can do their upgrades that way, good for them. I don't care when people tell me things like Achates and Jyakotsu are saying "I hear he's only in it for himself." Good for you guys to think that. The only people that matter and should matter to anyone for that fact are the people that are still in your shell. If you're not in my shell or you left it then I couldn't really give two shits about what you do and where you go. Whats the point of focusing outside it?

You can't expect loyalty when it comes to dynamis on differing levels depending on if your shell is external or internal. I've seen a lot of times where people would just rather bolt off to greener pastures when you hit a rough patch no matter how well you try to take care of them. We had a few bad runs and shaky attendance for a couple weeks and a guy we let sponser runs and even got an attestation for ran off like his house was on fire. All I can do is shake my head and say "Thats too bad."

Again though, if you want to blame someone for dynamis problems don't blame the people that took 4 or 5 members. Blame the community as a whole that has a hundred different shells making recruiting good solid members harder than ever.
 
Misinterpretation and reading between the lines are two entirely different things, the fact that you blatently said we want dedication vs skipping out on events was clarified when you said we want you all to be in our dynamis linkshell IE. when you said you wanted people to be in epitomes linkshell. This was stated here as well as when a friend of mine told me about your linkshell's meeting.

Meeze i appologize for bringing Vang in, it was inappropriate and was trying to just make a point.

Who doesn't want dedicated members? this is the one of the reasons why we started dynamis to give our members options to not have such scheduling conflicts with our other event schedules.

and yes we want everyone in BUT DO WE EXPECT THEM TO no of course not. and i've stated before we will live without them.

And who is this friend of yours that was in that meeting? So we can clear all this BS out now... If they don't want to do it in public have em send me a tell and we can settle this in game.
 
Who doesn't want dedicated members? this is the one of the reasons why we started dynamis to give our members options to not have such scheduling conflicts with our other event schedules.

and yes we want everyone in BUT DO WE EXPECT THEM TO no of course not. and i've stated before we will live without them.

And who is this friend of yours that was in that meeting? So we can clear all this BS out now... If they don't want to do it in public have em send me a tell and we can settle this in game.

LOL Edrama no thanks, you can ask your linkshell yourself.

Dedication is one thing LIKE zer and myself have said, giving ls mates no alternative is another
 
I'm online let's deal with this


hahahahahah what are u going to take me behind a building and steal my lunch money?

LOL u got something to say to me to threaten me?

dont let ur e pen grow too hard by sending me /tells u got something to say u can say it so everyone here can read
 
Then why flame us if u don't want to settle this? I'm still waiting in game to settle this.
 
Then why flame us if u don't want to settle this? I'm still waiting in game to settle this.

And ill wait for you here to keep saying what ive been saying. You dont like it? tough... Im sure Zerayla wants to read what u have to say as well... SINCE u took her members from her
 
Back
Top