Kids and their lack of knowledge of contraceptives

Lyrai said:
You can't blame someone for getting pregnant if you didn't give them the methods of prevention beforehand.

Yes I can. If I've taught you correctly about sex, the risks of unprotected sex, and then you go and do it anyway, I sure as hell can blame you for it. Knowledge is just as much a method of prevention as a condom or anything else.

As you said, knowledge is a method of prevention. If you don't give them knowledge about the subject...

Still, you children are your responsibility. If they fuck up, that means you fucked up. If they made a bad decision, it can be directly attributed to you making bad parenting decisions. Very few of us are any more than what our parents have made us.
 
in Sweden, the doctors have to tell the parents if their kid is getting an abortion under the age of 18, unless its a direct danger for the child, or it creates unnecessary risks and complications. Isn't it like that in the US?

And the schools can preach about abstinence all they want. But that doesn't mean teenagers once they become mature enough, which is becoming earlier and earlier, will have sex. Nowadays, that's usually around the age 10-12, and most people start having sex between the age of 15-20. If the school and parents only preach abstinence, they (the children), won't have the proper education about condoms etc. And thus, there's an increased risk of pregnant 12-15 year-olds and STD's among teenagers.

First you need to teach them the benefits of prevention. Otherwise it doesn't matter at all if you give it to them or not. And its not the school's job to give our condoms and pills to their students. That, if anything, encourage 12-year olds to have sex, which is not something to recommend at all. While I don't see anything wrong with handing out condoms to students over the age of 15, I really don't think pills is something you should hand out without parents permission, since it can create medical problems. And no offense to girls out there, but a lot of girls in high school and early years of collage seek the wrong kind of attention from guys in order to get approval of themselves. And handing out free pills could both encourage it, and lower the age in which some girls start acting slutty.
 
Still, you children are your responsibility. If they fuck up, that means you fucked up. If they made a bad decision, it can be directly attributed to you making bad parenting decisions. Very few of us are any more than what our parents have made us.

I think you've giving the kids way too little responsibility here. Sure if we're talking about a 6 year old doing something wrong, and maybe even middle schoolers in certain cases. These kids are apparently smart enough to be doing this behind their parent's backs, so they must know that it's wrong. You can't be with your kids all the time and sometimes even the best parenting won't stop a determined (and apparently horny) teenager. By the age of 2, humans have realized that they have a choice in their actions (my little baby tells me NO! all the time). The way your kids turn out is a reflection of your parenting, but even doing your damndest, you won't end up with perfect children. Should the child neglecters who end up with great children who overcome all odds take responsibility for their child's upbringing? I think it goes both ways. Bad parents can end up with good kids and good parents can end up with bad kids.
 
I think you've giving the kids way too little responsibility here. Sure if we're talking about a 6 year old doing something wrong, and maybe even middle schoolers in certain cases. These kids are apparently smart enough to be doing this behind their parent's backs, so they must know that it's wrong. You can't be with your kids all the time and sometimes even the best parenting won't stop a determined (and apparently horny) teenager. By the age of 2, humans have realized that they have a choice in their actions (my little baby tells me NO! all the time). The way your kids turn out is a reflection of your parenting, but even doing your damndest, you won't end up with perfect children. Should the child neglecters who end up with great children who overcome all odds take responsibility for their child's upbringing? I think it goes both ways. Bad parents can end up with good kids and good parents can end up with bad kids.
Naturally it depends on the kids as well. However, kids, even 15-year olds and a lot of 19-year olds, rarely think about the consequences of their actions. If you don't teach your children what the consequences of sex can be, they won't know. Sure, you can say that everyone knows that sex can create babies, kids don't actually THINK about it unless you talk about it with them thoroughly. They don't know how troublesome and even dangerous some STD's can be, and how many people actually have them.

Yes, kids know they're responsible for their own actions. But that does not mean they actually know the consequences of them. The reason kids now that killing is wrong, is because we instinctively know that killing something of your own species is wrong, and not because our parents taught it to us. Violence, sex, and stealing are not self-taught, they're passed on. Parents spend all this time telling their kids that stealing is wrong, hitting others is wrong, but they don't even mention the consequences of sex? Where does your priorities lie, really? You tell your kids hurting someone else is wrong. But hurting yourself (getting an STD/getting pregnant at the age of 12) most parents don't even mention.
 
Did you know if the woman is on top, she can't get pregnant? It's just gravity.
 
I'm talking about people who have numerous partners. And that's my opinion, I'm entitled to it.
Speaking of this, what would you consider "numerous"?

I mean, is 5 throughout your entire life numerous? Is 5 in 1 week, even though you never have sex again, numerous?

Is 5 numerous for a woman? Is 5 numerous for a man?

Because most people lie the favor in the male's corner. A lot of people think a woman having had more then 10 sex partners in their life that they're slutty, while a guy having had 10 is just fine.
 
Mondays only, Mirewen. I do nerd shit on Friday with friends.
 
Speaking of this, what would you consider "numerous"?

I mean, is 5 throughout your entire life numerous? Is 5 in 1 week, even though you never have sex again, numerous?

Is 5 numerous for a woman? Is 5 numerous for a man?

I'm talking numerous people at a time (not at the same time of course - orgy = gross). I have female friends that have had 3-4 male partners at the same time, none knew of eachother.

And Myrrh does this geek stuff include posting on QCDN? :p
 
We haven't left yet <_< Just finishing a Mission for DarkDominion then I'm off to do nerdy stuff.
 
I think you've giving the kids way too little responsibility here. Sure if we're talking about a 6 year old doing something wrong, and maybe even middle schoolers in certain cases. These kids are apparently smart enough to be doing this behind their parent's backs, so they must know that it's wrong.

Uzor said just about exactly what I was thinking. Teaching the kids the difference between right and wrong is pointless if you don't explain the consequences to them. If you tell a child stealing is wrong, they know it's wrong, but they don't understand why. If you explain to them how stealing hurts others, they understand better and are less likely to steal (at a young age). Eventually, you can just explain how it would make mom and dad sad if they knew you were doing something wrong, and if your children love you, that will be enough for them. I know it's enough for me.

You can't be with your kids all the time and sometimes even the best parenting won't stop a determined (and apparently horny) teenager. By the age of 2, humans have realized that they have a choice in their actions (my little baby tells me NO! all the time).

If I EVER told my mother no, there would be hell to pay. Before I was 18, if I had told her no, I would be living in a room with nothing but a bed and school books, and my meals consisting of little more than bread and water, would be brought to me. I would be allowed to leave to wash my dishes and do my laundry, while she stood next to me glaring in that way only she can. Even now that I am 26 years old, I know better than to tell my mother "no". My goal in life is to make her happy and make her proud of me.

The way your kids turn out is a reflection of your parenting, but even doing your damndest, you won't end up with perfect children. Should the child neglecters who end up with great children who overcome all odds take responsibility for their child's upbringing? I think it goes both ways. Bad parents can end up with good kids and good parents can end up with bad kids.

I agree with this, but for very specific reasons. There is no such thing as a perfect person. We will all make mistakes no matter what. When bad parents end up with good kids, it's because they have rebelled. They strive to be everything their parents weren't. They realize that their parents are worthless and hate them for it. Their need to be good people stems off of a strong hatered of their parents.

It's basiclly the same for good parents that have bad children. If the parents were to controlling and strict without making the children realize that they are deeply loved and cherished by the parents, then they will rebel and try to be everything their parents were not.

I had a good parent affect my life in a positive way, and I had a bad parent affect my life in a positive way. I love my mother, and even consider myself to be a "mamas boy". I would do most anything she tells me (aside from believe in god and don't smoke pot.) The worst punishment I could ever get would be for her to tell me she was disappointed in me. It happened one time, and I will never forget that feeling and I will do anything to never feel it again.

My father is a useless piece of shit crack head and I hate him and everything about him. I will never be like him and i will spit in his face (again) if he ever tries to say one word to me for the rest of his short ass miserable worthless life. He can never be sorry enough for what he did to my mother and sisters. He is the the one who has taught me the most about life, but he is the teacher that I am least thankful for because of how I learned from him.
 
as Trippy said, too much rules and too strict rules often end up the same thing as no rules. My sister's friend have such parents. And while she's "a good kid" at home, she lies all the time about the things she do to her parents, and do the opposite of what she's taught as soon as her parents are not watching.

And I'll have to agree with Trippy. The worst punishment you can get, ever, is to know you've disappointed your parents, assuming you don't hate your parents, in which case you'll want to disappoint them. You know why? Because rejection is the strongest fear known to man, and activates the same part of the brain as physical pain and death. Which is far worse then any punishment anyone could ever give you, especially coming from someone you love and respect as much as good parents.

To get back on the subject of teenagers and sex, it is extremely important for girls to have a good father figure to love and respect, as girls find men who resembles their fathers in behavior, and to some extent, looks. If they don't have a father figure, that does not apply. But imagine the future pain an abusive and aggressive father could cause a girl, if she'll later in life will be attracted to aggressive and abusive men.

Edit: and to explain how important teaching consequences and results of kid's actions, rather then just what's right and what's wrong, here's an example.

Your son takes a toy from another kid. Simply saying "No, bad boy. You can't take things from others, thats' wrong" and then giving the toy back to the kid at the playground, wouldn't teach him anything. Talking to him and explaining why its wrong gives much better results.

What would be best, talking to him at his level and ask how he would feel if you took his toy away, and then taking it and asking how he feels, and then asking your son to give the toy back, would explain much better why stealing is wrong, much better then just saying "bad boy", since it also shows the other person's situation, thus teaching your child empathy and sympathy as well. Naturally, you can't do this about hurting other people physically. But you can still ask how your son/daughter would feel if you hit them.
 
Last edited:
If I EVER told my mother no, there would be hell to pay. Before I was 18, if I had told her no, I would be living in a room with nothing but a bed and school books, and my meals consisting of little more than bread and water, would be brought to me.

Same here except for "he" not "she". My mother contributed nothing to my upbringing, not even fucking child support. ANYWAY. . . I listened to my dad. If my dad said "No" it was for a reason. I didn't need the reason though, I trusted him.
 
I'm talking about people who have numerous partners. And that's my opinion, I'm entitled to it.

Your original post was confusing, then, because it seems to be saying there are only two speeds for sexual activity: abstinance and total slut.
 
Shit call it what it is. Back in my day, girls had the right to say no. They didn't, but they had the right. Now they're too young that they're dumb enough to say yes. I've known about sex since I was like 10. I started "dating" girls (y'know, high school dating. IE: formality to get sex) once I heard it was awesome. Y'know what? It was/is awesome. I started when I was 14 and hope to never stop, which is part of my fear of committment and marriage. Only difference between then and now is these little bastards aren't using condoms. They aren't pulling out. They aren't making her ride on top so gravity prevents pregnancy (lolknockedup). Just a bunch of mindless bastards.
 
Shit call it what it is. Back in my day, girls had the right to say no. They didn't, but they had the right. Now they're too young that they're dumb enough to say yes. I've known about sex since I was like 10. I started "dating" girls (y'know, high school dating. IE: formality to get sex) once I heard it was awesome. Y'know what? It was/is awesome. I started when I was 14 and hope to never stop, which is part of my fear of committment and marriage. Only difference between then and now is these little bastards aren't using condoms. They aren't pulling out. They aren't making her ride on top so gravity prevents pregnancy (lolknockedup). Just a bunch of mindless bastards.
Pulling out isn't a fool proof way of preventing pregnancy either... >.>
 
Back
Top