Most of the thigns I said wasn't in response to you at all. I quoted your post because you responded with how you think other people think, and why I find it wrong. It wasn't an actually response to you, but your explaining why people think how they do. Although I suppose that could be seen as a direct response to you.Let's have a few quotes ...
And bolded for emphasis:
That wasn't in response to me, but I did find it ironic all things considered.
You're right, though, he did get one very obvious thing quite wrong, and that stuck in my mind (and apparently in the minds of others) leading me to take some of his other words with a fair bit of salt. For all I know (I don't exactly stalk his posts) he's been wrong about other stuff too. Or perhaps he hasn't. The example I gave is the one I remember - whether it's 1 out of 1 things he's been wrong about or 1 out of 100 things he's been wrong about, no clue and I'll admit that quite upfront. Such is the nature of an example, it doesn't indicate a relative frequency.
Throw in his lack of reading comprehension (understandable or not, it *is* still present and complicates discussing things with him) and his reactive attitude to empty jibes that any sensible person would ignore (see most Skaw one-liners). I *think* (could be remembering wrong) that he's also not too keen on considering the viewpoint from the opposing side of the argument, but such a lack of objectivity is *hardly* unique to him (it's present in the vast majority of internet arguments after all).
I don't think he's a moron and as I said before and apparently need to say again, I don't think he bought his account and I don't think he's RMT. I do, however, think that he's not the easiest person in the world to have a discussion/argument/debate with for a variety of factors, many of which I've explained above. (EDIT: I still don't have a beef with him and am quite willing to listen to his arguments, I'm just pointing out that it's a bit more difficult to discuss things with him than with others.) And while I won't write off everything someone says just because they had a blatant error in the past, I'm sure as hell not going to take *other* things they say at face value. Doesn't mean that I assume they're wrong, just means I don't assume they're right, and therefore I want backup information.
Well, it depends. They're taken out of context. So as they are alone, thy're not neccesarily slef-contradicting, since that requires him to have actually stated he never misses refreshes, which wasn't present in the quote.
Correction, he said that he didn't KNOW him. That doesn't deny the fact that he partied with him. I don't know everyone I party with. I've just simply partied with them. If I knew everyone I partied with, I'd know the entire server.
If I knew? Oh god yes, I would have. Ohgodohgodohgod I would have. It's one of those things where, if I could go back in time and say that to my slightly younger self, it's definitely a message of that importance. But since I lack time travel... I'm out of luck. Sorry. But yes, people you've brought into the shell are the reason I'm clawing my eyes out, and I'm not the only one. gj there champ, shows the kinda people you hang around with and the level you're apparently on.
But you said he was wrong about everything. Naturally, you must have meant one thing, unless you want to talk about opinions.
Oh? What shell is that? 'cause I can't recall ever doing Limbus with you. Which means one of 2 things if I were. You didn't stick out. Which can be both good and bad.
Why thank you. I'm right in there with the hackers and botters apparently.
...they hack? I was going for morons, but if they hack, that's... well, even worse.
No, they don't hack. I was talking about OuterHeaven.
Yeah... How are those nashira pants working out for you, by the way?
They're great, thank you. Go right along with my Crimson Cuisses and Kirin's Osode. for my lvl 69 NIN.
Still haven't mentioned which shell it was. I could say I was in a shell with you and dropped it because you were so horrible. Doesn't mean people would believe me.
