morrigan's robe on quetz.

Still haven't mentioned which shell it was. I could say I was in a shell with you and dropped it because you were so horrible. Doesn't mean people would believe me.

I don't remember the name? It was the one running alongside with Purpose functions before I took over. He admitted to missing the refresh, I'm not making this up dipshit.
 
Man, I've been waiting a long time to post that.
I never said they hacked when I got those items :p you asked how my Nashira Legs were, and I answered. Yes, I did get them in OuterHeaven. I never mentioned they hacked when I got them.

Maybe you should have asked that as well instead of assuming :p Good try though.

Jamal said:
I don't remember the name? It was the one running alongside with Purpose functions before I took over. He admitted to missing the refresh, I'm not making this up dipshit.
I never mentioned you made it up. I happen to know you were in Johnnyb's shell. I simply said you should provide proof with your claims, since you always state proof is needed yourself. Like, say, with Kabrina.

Man, this is so fun. Keep it up ^^ This thread can keep me entertained all night :D
 
I never said they hacked when I got those items :p you asked how my Nashira Legs were, and I answered. Yes, I did get them in OuterHeaven. I never mentioned they hacked when I got them.

Maybe you should have asked that as well instead of assuming :p Good try though.


I never mentioned you made it up. I happen to know you were in Johnnyb's shell. I simply said you should provide proof with your claims, since you always state proof is needed yourself. Like, say, with Kabrina.

Man, this is so fun. Keep it up ^^ This thread can keep me entertained all night :D
Yeah, I'm sure they didn't hack on (at the time) a really hard fight. I'm sure those are perfectly clean. Really. Honestly. The same linkshell that was looking for ways to steal another LS's Ultima... perfectly clean, I'm sure.
Besides, would you really say "Yes, what I said earlier was a lie, and I did gain something from OH's hacking."? Right.
 
Still haven't mentioned which shell it was. I could say I was in a shell with you and dropped it because you were so horrible. Doesn't mean people would believe me.

This implies I was making it up. If you knew the shell, there's no point in questioning me.
 
Yeah, I'm sure they didn't hack on (at the time) a really hard fight. I'm sure those are perfectly clean. Really. Honestly. The same linkshell that was looking for ways to steal another LS's Ultima... perfectly clean, I'm sure.
Besides, would you really say "Yes, what I said earlier was a lie, and I did gain something from OH's hacking."? Right.
It wasn't Ultima, it was Omega. It was a quite fun discussion atm.

And yes, we totally hacked Ultima. It is very easy to kite a mob with Draw-In. We also used hacks to constantly keep our MP and HP full with Invincible.exe. I especially liked the chainspell.exe hack that reset all of our job ability and magics recast time at 0 with instant cast.
 
This topic isn't about cool gear anymore. :( Let's all discuss how awesome my new ring is and why I'm better than you are!
 
This implies I was making it up. If you knew the shell, there's no point in questioning me.
I questioned you because you failed to provide the community with proof. Despite you sticking up for your girlfriend's accusations of being involved with hacking. Reason being "You don't have any proof" and "She says she regrets it". Which would, indeed, be saying she was involved with it.
 
Correction, he said that he didn't KNOW him. That doesn't deny the fact that he partied with him. I don't know everyone I party with. I've just simply partied with them. If I knew everyone I partied with, I'd know the entire server.

I expected a better rebuttal than that, that's just using a loophole in the phrasing and doesn't really address the point. :P

The second quote could effectively mean one of two *general* things:

1. A straightforward reply *on the subject*, with not perhaps the most perfectly accurate choice of wording.

2. A misleading reply *on another subject*, with carefully chosen wording to lend itself to an implication that is not what it technically says.

Personally I'm leaning towards #1. Pchan's posts, on the whole, tend to be straightforward. I don't really see him carefully wording something to try to trick people who don't follow his wording absolutely exactly. :P
 
This topic isn't about cool gear anymore. :( Let's all discuss how awesome my new ring is and why I'm better than you are!

Divisor Ring? Indeed, that's a nice ring.
 
Uzor said:
till haven't mentioned which shell it was. I could say I was in a shell with you and dropped it because you were so horrible. Doesn't mean people would believe me.

It was the Limbus LS Johnnyb led for months and you knew this? You really like to off tangent don't you. And argue too. But you really suck at it. Were you on the debate team and always lost?
 
Last edited:
I questioned you because you failed to provide the community with proof. Despite you sticking up for your girlfriend's accusations of being involved with hacking. Reason being "You don't have any proof" and "She says she regrets it". Which would, indeed, be saying she was involved with it.


I'll be honest, I was wrong there. She wasn't my girlfriend by any means, but I trusted what she told me. That was my mistake, but has NOTHING to do with the situation at hand. Like I mentioned earlier in this thread though, if someone isn't up to par, I will let them know. I sure did to her.
 
It was the Limbus LS Johnnyb led for months. You really like to off tangent don't you.
I already said before your reply that I knew which shell it was. Fail moar. (yes, I totally didn't misspell that on purpose)
 
I'll be honest, I was wrong there. She wasn't my girlfriend by any means, but I trusted what she told me. That was my mistake, but has NOTHING to do with the situation at hand. Like I mentioned earlier in this thread though, if someone isn't up to par, I will let them know. I sure did to her.
Well, good for you. That at least earns you SOME respect in my book.
 
I already said before your reply that I knew which shell it was. Fail moar. (yes, I totally didn't misspell that on purpose)

Then why did you impy he made it up here:
Still haven't mentioned which shell it was. I could say I was in a shell with you and dropped it because you were so horrible. Doesn't mean people would believe me.

Are you just nitpicking to avoid the actual topic or did you forget and then remeber?
 
He was trying to make a personal attack against me.

Ouch it hurt.
 
I already said before your reply that I knew which shell it was. Fail moar. (yes, I totally didn't misspell that on purpose)

I'm sorry I was too busy looking for your reply to my post, but it never came. I guess when you are proved to be an idiot that doesn't know what contradiction means, you don't reply.

The continuing postings in the defense of Pchan, for god knows what reason, just further push you into the category of stupid douchebags of QCDN.
 
Then why did you impy he made it up here:


Are you just nitpicking to avoid the actual topic or did you forget and then remeber?

This is what Uzor does Duncan. Everyone who posts on QCDN knows this. He likes to pick fights on a posting board even though he looks like a complete dumbass. But thanks for pointing out his idiocy, I love when people do :D
 
I'm sorry I was too busy looking for your reply to my post, but it never came. I guess when you are proved to be an idiot that doesn't know what contradiction means, you don't reply.

The continuing postings in the defense of Pchan, for god knows what reason, just further push you into the category of stupid douchebags of QCDN.
I am a douchebag, and an asshole. And a dick. I'm already well aware of it. To be honest, I quite enjoy it.

And I never say your post.

Then why did you impy he made it up here:


Are you just nitpicking to avoid the actual topic or did you forget and then remeber?
Like Jamal said, it was a "personal attack". Well, it wasn't really a personal attack. It was just me demanding proof for what he said. Whether I know which shell he was in or not, doesn't change the fact that you should provide proof with your claims. My point was, if he doesn't want to provide proof, someone could come and make wild accusations without any proof at all, and say its the truth. The proof burden always lies with the accuser, not with the accused.

The only time this is not true, is when you want to return bought objects. X months after you've bought it, the burden that it was in fact a faulty item, lies with the customer. Before that, the the burden lies on the store to prove that it was not a faulty item.
 
I

Like Jamal said, it was a "personal attack". Well, it wasn't really a personal attack. It was just me demanding proof for what he said. Whether I know which shell he was in or not, doesn't change the fact that you should provide proof with your claims.

You only need to prove something to someone if they don't know or believe what you have said. I believe you already knew he was in the shell making it pointless for him to prove it.
 
Back
Top