You know this was like a 50-something page arguement back on the old qcdn...
Red mage giving TP to mobs is proven (whether they do enough damage to make the tp given to the mob worthwhile is another matter but i'll leave that alone...)
It can be easily tested by dusting off your BST, hitting a mob then charming it to see the tp difference.
But the main problem with RDM melee is AoE and them not doing their job. The former means they should not melee as it puts extra pressure on the WHM, and the latter is obvious. Frankly if a rdm can do his job and melee then its fine by me (assuming it doesn't AoE that is); I doubt the tp he gives is so massive that it can't be coped with (even if it is an annoyance), but the main problem is that most people cannot do both at the same time, now people try and defend melee but do not defend shitty rdm, when often they are the same thing. YES rdm can melee, but is it successful? i would have to say that at least 90% of the time it is more than a hinderance than a help, but if you are one of the minority that only melee when it makes sense and it in no way hinders your job ability then good job, give yourself a clap on the back.
In a nutshell this subject has been argued to death more than once, lets not bother again. Meleeing rdm (who can't do their job as well) are a problem that has been around for a long while and will no doubt stay unless SE decide to remove sword privilages from rdm, deal with it and move on because no doubt you will find bad players from other classes just as often just not under such a common steriotype as "meleeing rdm".
Red mage giving TP to mobs is proven (whether they do enough damage to make the tp given to the mob worthwhile is another matter but i'll leave that alone...)
It can be easily tested by dusting off your BST, hitting a mob then charming it to see the tp difference.
But the main problem with RDM melee is AoE and them not doing their job. The former means they should not melee as it puts extra pressure on the WHM, and the latter is obvious. Frankly if a rdm can do his job and melee then its fine by me (assuming it doesn't AoE that is); I doubt the tp he gives is so massive that it can't be coped with (even if it is an annoyance), but the main problem is that most people cannot do both at the same time, now people try and defend melee but do not defend shitty rdm, when often they are the same thing. YES rdm can melee, but is it successful? i would have to say that at least 90% of the time it is more than a hinderance than a help, but if you are one of the minority that only melee when it makes sense and it in no way hinders your job ability then good job, give yourself a clap on the back.
In a nutshell this subject has been argued to death more than once, lets not bother again. Meleeing rdm (who can't do their job as well) are a problem that has been around for a long while and will no doubt stay unless SE decide to remove sword privilages from rdm, deal with it and move on because no doubt you will find bad players from other classes just as often just not under such a common steriotype as "meleeing rdm".