Some People Are Dumb

Status
Not open for further replies.
The difference between (EDIT: the acceptability of) homosexuality and pedophilia is the issue of consensuality (even if the kid thinks they're doing it out of their own free will, kids are so easy to manipulate - between inexperience and immaturity and desire for acceptance and fear of reprisal - that it doesn't really count). It always bugs me when ignorant people equate the two.

Of course, you could bring up the consensuality issue in this argument too ... would it be a form of rape to force someone to have sex with either a. someone of the gender they're not interested in, or b. someone disgusting of the gender they *are* interested in? Probably, yeah.


Everyone knows the difference and it was only brought up as a responce to whether just recieving oral is considered gay. Yes, just as much as recieving oral from a kid makes you a pedophile or recieve oral from a dog make you into beastiality. Obviously none of them are the same and no one is equating the 3.
 
Everyone knows the difference and it was only brought up as a responce to whether just recieving oral is considered gay. Yes, just as much as recieving oral from a kid makes you a pedophile or recieve oral from a dog make you into beastiality. Obviously none of them are the same and no one is equating the 3.

I agree that it's a gay action, but one single sexual experience does not dictate sexuality. A gay man can have sex with a woman one time (perhaps out of drunkenness, perhaps to see what the other side of the fence is like, or any number of reasons) and still consider himself gay after that.

The same can be said of a straight man having sex with a man once (for, again, any number of reasons) and then continuing to be straight afterward, though straight boys are weird and tend to have hang-ups about this concept. Hence rationalizations of "it doesn't count as gay if you're the top" or "it doesn't count as gay if you don't do anything to the other guy" or whatever. They're really just meaningless, and only serve to reassure the less securely-straight guys that they are in fact still straight after doing something gay. :P
 
That's right, I've never known my ass and I'd like to keep it that way.

Ba dum bum!

Another smart answer, from a smart guy.

If this was about what your dick wanted to fuck, as I've already said, I'd answer tits and vag as well. That's not what this is about, however. When I am seeing people such as yourself and Ex so vehemently say, "I fuck tits ONRY and I am proud! Anyone else is a closet fag, man. Titty parade all day long to show how kewl of a man-man I am", it's plain as day who is "hiding" in their closet.

This isn't even about homosexuality, but some people are so scared that it might be, or that the word anus is mentioned.


Tom, you ever fuck that wife of your up the ass? You ever plunge a finger or tongue in that hole, dude? Or you're afraid that going there might paint you into the gay corner?
Psst. She'll like it...If you're any good.



If you actually read any of this thread, you'd at least understand what this is about. If you didn't read, you're ignorant. If you read it and didn't understand or don't want to, you're ignorant. You're probably the only person dumber than Ex to grace this thread.
 
I agree that it's a gay action, but one single sexual experience does not dictate sexuality. A gay man can have sex with a woman one time (perhaps out of drunkenness, perhaps to see what the other side of the fence is like, or any number of reasons) and still consider himself gay after that.


That's a fair arguement but it's all subjective now. It's a gay act but it doesn't necessarily make you gay. Ok what if you only did it twice? Three times? How many times do you do it before your considered "gay". I'm sure there are men in prison who have received oral 100+ times who would shank you if you even hinted that they were gay. While someone who does it a couple times says he gay. Is being homosexual just a label you put on yourself regardless of how many gay acts you perform?
 
Your still receiving pleasure from another man. Whose says there's a difference between giving or receiving sex to be considered gay? Unless you've spent some time in prison, I'm assuming your just playing devil's advocate in which case you could say the same thing about little kids or your pet dog and ask "what's the difference whose mouth it is?" How you derive the pleasure is a factor on being homosexual or in the kids and rover's case deranged.

So why exactly would you prefer to fuck that girl over a good looking man? Just because you'd be considered gay?

In all honesty, if you have to avoid everything gay, even on a question like this, you must be rather insecure about your own sexuality.
 
That's a fair arguement but it's all subjective now. It's a gay act but it doesn't necessarily make you gay. Ok what if you only did it twice? Three times? How many times do you do it before your considered "gay". I'm sure there are men in prison who have received oral 100+ times who would shank you if you even hinted that they were gay. While someone who does it a couple times says he gay. Is being homosexual just a label you put on yourself regardless of how many gay acts you perform?
You're gay because you have a male preferance, not neccesarily because you fucked a guy once.
 
This isn't even about homosexuality, but some people are so scared that it might be, or that the word anus is mentioned.

The anus is not the point. Some people on this thread prefer the company of an attractive man versus a hidious woman. You have chosen a gay act over a straight one. The bum fucking as much as you enjoy it is not the question. You obviously don't care whose ass you fuck so you and Brad can have fun.
 
The anus is not the point. Some people on this thread prefer the company of an attractive man versus a hidious woman. You have chosen a gay act over a straight one. The bum fucking as much as you enjoy it is not the question. You obviously don't care whose ass you fuck so you and Brad can have fun.



Thanks for redefining ignorance.
 
The anus is not the point. Some people on this thread prefer the company of an attractive man versus a hidious woman. You have chosen a gay act over a straight one. The bum fucking as much as you enjoy it is not the question. You obviously don't care whose ass you fuck so you and Brad can have fun.
I don't see how you could possibly enjoy the company of that hideous woman. Hell, I think I'd have hellova hard time even getting it hard, and an even harder time keeping it hard with a wallrus on top of me. And if that wallrus is under me, I'd doubt I could even reach her privates with that fat hanging down over it.
 
So why exactly would you prefer to fuck that girl over a good looking man? Just because you'd be considered gay?

In all honesty, if you have to avoid everything gay, even on a question like this, you must be rather insecure about your own sexuality.

Because her being 700 pounds isn't enough incentive for me to sleep with a man. And if it is for you then apparently it doesn't take much to turn you. Now if it was a choice between Brad Pitt and a chick with HIV then I might lean towards Brad. I can bang the fat chick doggystyle and in the dark to maintain as little contact with her groteque body as possible and pull something out of the spank bank to help me threw it.
 
Because her being 700 pounds isn't enough incentive for me to sleep with a man. And if it is for you then apparently it doesn't take much to turn you. Now if it was a choice between Brad Pitt and a chick with HIV then I might lean towards Brad. I can bang the fat chick doggystyle and in the dark to maintain as little contact with her groteque body as possible and pull something out of the spank bank to help me threw it.

What if the fat lady had an abnormal vaginal leak from her cervex and anytime she had sex...there would just be creepy liquid leaking down her inner areas? >.>;
 
Because her being 700 pounds isn't enough incentive for me to sleep with a man. And if it is for you then apparently it doesn't take much to turn you. Now if it was a choice between Brad Pitt and a chick with HIV then I might lean towards Brad. I can bang the fat chick doggystyle and in the dark to maintain as little contact with her groteque body as possible and pull something out of the spank bank to help me threw it.

Its not a matter of "turning" everyone. Chosing Brad Pitt over her doesn't mean you automatically turn gay. Its a matter of preferance. I don't know about you, but I don't want to stick mine in to every little thing with breasts and a vagina.
 
I don't see how you could possibly enjoy the company of that hideous woman.

I don't think any straight person would enjoy either option. This is about chosing the lesser of 2 evils. There's no right answer. I obviously prefer the woman and some people the man. Whatever......
 
Now if it was a choice between Brad Pitt and a chick with HIV then I might lean towards Brad.



Now you're starting to use the appropriate example for you. Like I said, this idea is not tied to my example. For me, and it would seem, most people, my example is enough to tip the scales. The idea has always been to find something that would make you choose the opposite from your normal preference. That was mentioned several times. Thanks for reading...And posting.


Good job, new found faggot. ^^
Wow you must be so gay to bury your johnson in Brad's ass. Dude, I can't believe you'd fuck "a guy" over a girl with the HIV. Dude!!! It's girl versus guy and you pick the good looking guy?!?! You're gay. I'm macho!
 
What if the fat lady had an abnormal vaginal leak from her cervex and anytime she had sex...there would just be creepy liquid leaking down her inner areas? >.>;

Now your just being silly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top