Some People Are Dumb

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trouble said:
It's funny that no one has mentioned personality or temperament, or maybe they did and I missed it. An overweight, plain person that is honest, fun and funny with a great personality would be my choice over a Greek God(or Goddess) who is an egotistical asshole with no personality who is also morally bankrupt. Is it me or are you guys kind of shallow?
Click to expand...


If not wanting to fuck the nicest person on the planet, because they're 700lbs makes me shallow, I'm okay with it. I can handle an overweight woman, maybe 40lbs overweight or something, but 700lbs? That's like 500lbs past what could even be considered healthy, much less attractive.
 
No where once did I say that saying a guy looks good makes you gay. I said that if you get your dick hard for Brad Pitt, than you are gay. I will admit Brad Pitt looks good. That does not in any way mean I'm attracted to him. I think he is aesthetically pleasing. Sorry I don't fuck people based on how aesthetically pleasing; it has to do with attraction. I'm not or ever would be able to be attracted to a male body.

See you guys are arguing that it's not gay to fuck Brad Pitt because the other option is far worse. Homosexual acts are not based on what other choices you had, it's on the choice you made. I'm fine that you will pick Brad Pitt over the fat ugly chick, but you than have to admit that you are choosing the homosexual way out.

Like if the choice was between fucking a horse and homosexuality, I'd go with homosexuality over beastiality. In this case, I'd go with ugly straight over handsome gay.

Oh and thanks for assuming I'm ugly. On the contrary, I'm in a better shape than most people will ever dream of being in their life. If you'd like a pic, I'd be glad to show you.

There always comes an asshole takes a good argument and throws personal insults at it. Let me put it this way to you, if you can't argue with points and you need personal insults, don't argue at all.

Oh and go read up on biology. Fetus do not all start off as female, that's a common misconception. While they all do start off the same, females still under go changes in the gender identification. Outside the early brain, fetus has no gender identification at all.

I hate morons.
 
Um...She wasn't just fat. lol
If she was, I'd sleep with the woman that was just fat.

I just Googled "Really Fat Bitches". The fattest example was approximately 1/2 the size of the original example.


It's the idea of pitting the worst, God awful example of what you are used to, versus, more or less, the best possible example of what you are not used to...Aesthetically, as RoM mentioned. Biological steers this thing in a direction unintended, really, but is yet another perspective. RoM mentioned that biologically, if the rhino, Brad Pitt and you were left on an island, nobody would be getting fucked. Obviously. From the get-go it is a given that you DO NOT want to end up with either choice. This really boils down to aesthetics only and how far to you have to be pushed to alter an aesthetic preference, in a completely unrealistic scenario.

I'd still say, for those that have brought RL tendencies into this, that attraction, and being able to "get it up" (without pills), is a pretty obvious indicator of what label you give yourself. We are dealing with a scenario (in my case and example) where I am attracted to neither, yet I find one example to be over-the-top sickening and completely impossible for me to go through with (given the aid from pills - the only way possible). One of the two choices will ultimately win by what is nothing more than default. It means nothing.

I think for each individual, there is something, and some possible example that hits home for them, that would force them to make the same decision. Whether or not they admit it is another story. It's not wrong if you don't admit it. Some straight people would still fuck the most eye-displeasing woman over the most eye-pleasing man. To me, that is disgusting. Jabba The Hut, no matter the gender, no thanks.
 
Artem said:
Oh and go read up on biology. Fetus do not all start off as female, that's a common misconception. While they all do start off the same, females still under go changes in the gender identification. Outside the early brain, fetus has no gender identification at all.
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is that all humans start off as Galka's?

Well that's a twist.
 
Artem said:
I said that if you get your dick hard for Brad Pitt, than you are gay.
Click to expand...

Now here's a question for you then: Let's say you're watching a rodeo, and in the course of the excitment there in, you pop a boner. Does that mean you're into beastiality?
 
Artem said:
Oh and go read up on biology. Fetus do not all start off as female, that's a common misconception. While they all do start off the same, females still under go changes in the gender identification. Outside the early brain, fetus has no gender identification at all.

I hate morons.
Click to expand...

Okay, since you mentioned biology, and people are referencing research studies that have no basis in fact, let's do something really strange and throw some science into the mix.

Women have two chromosomes, XX
Men have two chromosomes, XY

The male determines the sex of the baby, either an X from the female combines with an X from the male and you get a girl baby, or an X from the female combines with a Y from the male and you get a boy baby. Sex is determined as soon as the sperm wiggles it's way into the egg. Sex is determined at conception.

I defy ANYONE to prove me wrong lol.
 
Excalibr said:
I could care less if you think I'm afraid of gay people or not Sneaky.
Click to expand...



It's "couldn't" care less, if you mean what I think you mean.

And I agree in that I don't care if you are afraid of gay people either lol.

Still not seeing it. It might help if you read it, but w/e.
 
Andreva said:
Now here's a question for you then: Let's say you're watching a rodeo, and in the course of the excitment there in, you pop a boner. Does that mean you're into beastiality?
Click to expand...

Uh.... I kinda would wonder if I was if seeing a bull moving around gave me a boner. Now if it was the way the man/woman was bouncing that gave you an erection that's another story since that can be quite a suggestive theme if you so happen to be into rough sex or have an overly active imagination.
 
You know, all of you are kind of ignoring the fact that men can get it up, even if they're far from interrested in having sex. You don't need to be horny etc. to get it up. Sometimes it just decides to stand up on its own. Additionally, I'm rather sure anyone male could get a 100% won't-fuck-guys-for-any-reason hard, unless they have problems getting it hard, in which case hot women would have a hard time aswell.
 
I let a dog lick peanut butter off my balls. Does that make me gay?
 
Sneakypants said:
It's "couldn't" care less, if you mean what I think you mean.

And I agree in that I don't care if you are afraid of gay people either lol.

Still not seeing it. It might help if you read it, but w/e.
Click to expand...

Yea, couldn't...w/e, I've always said could.

I did see the pic you were talking about and I would still choose a chick over a dude, just for the record.
 
Correct me of I'm wrong.

If I chose the 700 lbs woman over Brad Pitt..that makes me a homophobe who is insecure about my sexuality..but if I chose Brad Pitt..I'm just gay? Well that's not fair :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top