This is why teenagers don't run economies

[Bajaratt]

lol i wanna know why it really matters. If people want to have a foragers..they buy foragers....If people want amemet...they buy amemet. Has nothing to do with the economy, its a #^^%ing game. You people shouldnt treat ff as RL. You make gil to buy what you want, not let people choose for you. Hell i bet if i put a foragers on AH for 4 mil it would sell just bc its what people want. And foragers is alot more rare(prolly why more people want it) than amemet bc i see people in juno popping em out left and right.

i dont care i just care that they are saying that having the amemet is "stupid"

No one said that, what we're all saying, except for peregrine, is that forager's is better than amemet or amemet +1 for all jobs but ranger.

 

[CubsWoo]

i dont care i just care that they are saying that having the amemet is "stupid"

We aren't. I personally have an NQ Amemet. I had a +1 back when I was hardcore level grinding, and if I had taken any time off leveling back when I got 71-75 in the course of about a week and a half I probably would have bought a Forager's. Now I'm grinding my Woodworking and only really using my Monk for farming and helping people out with random easy stuff for a 75 to do so having the gil to sink into Lancewood and Adaman Ingots seemed more worthwhile than having a little more STR and Attack for fighting TW and EP mobs.

What we're doing is defending the decision of people to have the best +STR/Attack back piece available against someone who's decided that anyone foolish enough to use it is automatically less of a player for it.

 

[Odon]

Hey pere, I just spent 3.7 mil on 1 int.


I'm cool.

omgs how dare you better yourself

I'm sorry masa ;;

 

[quitita]

<<< has amemet and is uber :shock:

 

[hellstorm]

Also, how does a Forager's instead of a Amemet +1 make it any harder for a job to hit a mob with a ranged attack?

(Hint: It doesn't.)

Homerun. If the Amemet+1 had Ranged Accuracy, Peregrine would be right. But guess what? It doesn't.

And even if it did have ranged accuracy, that would still be useless on a job that doesn't shoot anything.

thf do shoot they are puller and even thf/rng <the good one atleast> shoot while they are reposioning there attacks. to say that 15 range attack dont help is saying that the 14 attack on the assult jerkin dont help dragoons.

Notice how I mentioned jobs that don't shoot anything? Drk, War, Mnk, Drg, and Sam (sometimes) don't shoot anything, and thus gain 0 benefit from ranged attack. A thief doesn't get that much benefit from it anyways, they shoot maybe twice per fight, where as every one of those jobs melees, and would benefit from the 1 more STR than the 15 ranged attack.

oh my bad then though you where including thf and sam in that in that case you whould be currect and the better none shooting dd should have forgers

 

[Skaw]

No one said that, what we're all saying, except for peregrine, is that forager's is better than amemet or amemet +1 for all jobs but ranger.

Exactly, I'm not going to rag on someone(intentionally) for having an Amemet+1.

Peregrine is the idiot sayin that Foragers is in no way better than Amemet +1. And the fact that for a "measily" +1 upgrade, it's the cheapest net spending you can possibly get on an end game misc slot peice(back, rings, neck)

 

[hellstorm]

Just as an aside - Hellstorm, learn how to post properly on forums before trying to make quote-tree posts. It gets really confusing and nobody's going to read what you write.

Also, there's a Preview button for a reason. See if the post looks readable, and if it isn't - please fix it before posting.

well it your fault for taking out that dam edit key :evil:

 

[Bajaratt]

Cubs didn't make the boards, Pupusa did.

 

[quitita]

It all really depends on what job. Being Sam range attack is great so i use amemet and instead of spending 3 mil on foragers i have commander cape(only 1mil) +3 str to sub for ws.

 

[CubsWoo]

No, no, no matter what I do, it's always my fault and I'm the Hitler/Satan/Bush love triangle child. Don't you ever read these boards?

 

[Odon]

Don't you ever read these boards?

No, I dont.

 

[CubsWoo]

It all really depends on what job. Being Sam range attack is great so i use amemet and instead of spending 3 mil on foragers i have commander cape(only 1mil) +3 str to sub for ws.

C+ skill is 'great?' Maybe if you're subbing RNG, but even then I dunno.

 

[Bajaratt]

No one said that, what we're all saying, except for peregrine, is that forager's is better than amemet or amemet +1 for all jobs but ranger.

Exactly, I'm not going to rag on someone(intentionally) for having an Amemet+1.

Peregrine is the idiot sayin that Foragers is in no way better than Amemet +1. And the fact that for a "measily" +1 upgrade, it's the cheapest net spending you can possibly get on an end game misc slot peice(back, rings, neck)

Yeah, I'm actually at the point where I could get to 75 without having to spend a single gil, outside of food, on my monk and not be considered gimp. I will spend more money on monk, because I don't want to be "just another monk," I want to be the best that I can, so I'm going to get things like a Forager's mantle.

 

[hellstorm]

No, no, no matter what I do, it's always my fault and I'm the Hitler/Satan/Bush love triangle child. Don't you ever read these boards?

dont you know it come with the job :twisted:
no i mean it qucn in genral for getting rid of the edit key

 

[Strid]

It all really depends on what job. Being Sam range attack is great so i use amemet and instead of spending 3 mil on foragers i have commander cape(only 1mil) +3 str to sub for ws.

C+ skill is 'great?' Maybe if you're subbing RNG, but even then I dunno.

SAM/RNG pre nerf(not sure how it is now) was a good but often undermined combo. They make for good archers all in all.

 

[hellstorm]

It all really depends on what job. Being Sam range attack is great so i use amemet and instead of spending 3 mil on foragers i have commander cape(only 1mil) +3 str to sub for ws.

bingo

 

[quitita]

It all really depends on what job. Being Sam range attack is great so i use amemet and instead of spending 3 mil on foragers i have commander cape(only 1mil) +3 str to sub for ws.

C+ skill is 'great?' Maybe if you're subbing RNG, but even then I dunno.

um...before patch sam/rng own most DD(not all) out there even rngs(not all) bc i xp'd with rangers and my rng atts and ws do more dam than them. Dam you SE.

 

[meeze]

i use amemit+1. it serves both rng and drk and i don't feel like carrying two back pieces for 2 different jobs when almost every other slot i carry 2 pieces for each job that are different for each job.

for example, drk i carry adaman celata for tp, af1 for ws's, rng i use O hat for tp and wyvern helm for ws. that is a shitload of gear to carry for two jobs i actively use.

i gaurantee i will buy foragers for DRK before i spend 30k xp on +1 str in merits.

 

[CubsWoo]

No, no, no matter what I do, it's always my fault and I'm the Hitler/Satan/Bush love triangle child. Don't you ever read these boards?

dont you know it come with the job :twisted:
no i mean it qucn in genral for getting rid of the edit key

Edit exists in every sub-forum on QCDN except this one. You can fix your problems with Preview a million times without problems but once you hit Submit on the FB's you said what you said.

 

[hellstorm]

honestly the frist mistake you where making was comparing 1 job to anouther. THF and MNk are 2 diffent job need 2 diffent style of fighting
gear is almost completely diffent. I still dont see big deal with 1 str like quitita said wait 3 more lvl and get a commander cape seem like a much better buy and spend that mil toward new rings. Unless you have a endless supply of gill like oden then spend to your heart content you can afford it