- Joined
- Feb 11, 2005
- Messages
- 5,126
- Age
- 41
romperstomper said:Sounds like someone is still mad about losing to the Yankees in '96.
Nah, I don't now nor did I then ever expect anything more than divisional titles from the Braves. There is just two teams I absolutly can't effin stand and that's the Astros and the Yankees. Has nothing to do with records or them beating teams I like and all to do with really having no reason other than not being big fans of their players.
The Braves usually are middle of the pack with starting pitching
Now yes, not even middle of the pack this year. The braves are totally sucking it up right along side everyone else this year and have for the past few as well. USUALLY, however, the Braves have one of the best pitching staffs in the game. You making this statement really makes me wonder how much you really know about pitching or baseball in general.
the Oakland Athletics who for the past I don't know 30 years have had priobably the best rotations put together along with a solid bullpen.
You must be from Oakland or I'm not catching the sarcasm, which is it ? :/
Hell the White Sox,even with poor performances lately via Mark Buehrle Javier Vazquez oh hell pretty much everyone but Bobby Jenks and Jon Garland pitching staff wise, still have a better rotation than the Braves. Who is your ace Tim Hudson right? Yea last I checked Hudson hasn't been all that spectacular, but looking back the NL does blow compared to the AL.
Going to agree with you here but I'm not sure where you are comming from. I never said the Braves pitching was even decent this year. As far as I'm concerned the only good pitcher they have is Smoltz as of now. The Braves need to hit the pitching market too. As per the NL Vs. AL comment I'm not sure where you come up with that garbage but alls I have to say is at least in the NL, they may suck at it, but the pitchers aren't to pussy to bat