hello everyone.
Now I feel.
Maybe this is culture gap.
If somebody is doubting a person.
At first the person who doubted it should present evidence.
This is Japanese general rule.
And I think so,too.
Maybe Shel think so,too.
However, I think that it is a different problem in this case.
If evidence was nowhere.
Whether the event even occurred cannot be proven.
If the hit-and-run case happened.
Parts of the car will become the evidences of the hit and run.
Other things might become evidences,too.
If the person was lying on the road.
This is not evidence on hit and run.
Because he might be falling on the road due to sickness.
First of all, please present evidence can be proven to be an occurrence of the event.
First of all, it is proven that the event happened.
Next, evidence to prove defendant's guiltiness from the plaintiff is presented.
And, the defendant presents the evidence to plead innocence.
I think that this is usual.
But now there is no evidence that the event happened.
However, some of the people have trusted Vang.
What did you see and did you judge?
ShitarabaBBS?or only Vang's opinion?
It is both wrong thing.
There is contradiction in my opinion.
I wrote opinion in two standpoints.
Person who insists on validity instead of Shel.
And, the third party.
When I speak instead of Shel.
I say Shel's insistence is all true.
I told please believe my insistence.
When I speak as a third party.
There is no evidence.
I told 'don't believe both'.
This is one of the reasons why my opinion is strange.
-----To Mr(?).Oropher and Miss(?)Nasya----
I'm not Shel.
I say in my first opinion.
My name is 'Mjamyster' in Vanadiel.
Tiamat is not my name in Vanadiel.
--------------------------------------------------------
I have another main character. However, I am very cowardly.(原文:私は非常に臆病です)
There was a nuisance tell to the person who did not have the relation.
From Savingway to Horihori.
When some problems happen.
Does the policeman arrest his friend and his family?
It is very strange thing.
He is only a friend.
Please do not attack to Shel's friend.
Please stop involving the person who doesn't have the relation.
It is a very unfair thing that uses searchcomment and shout.
I think this is mean action.
I think it is the same as terrorism.
I cannot introduce myself to the terrorist.
It is a very scary thing.
Writing in the Jp BBS by anonymity is usual.
However, a lot of people are introducing themselves the name of the character here.
At first, I wanted to see the reaction from members in this BBS.
So, 2nd Character's name was put out first.
And some NA persons thinking my maincharacter is a racist.
Because I do not understand the slang word.
When quarreling, I used this word.
Whitey. Fuck. [Country][leave][Goodbye]. [English][No,thank you][leave].
I know it is fucking discriminatory words.
But my English skill is too low to quarrel.
So I used bad words.
Some people think me to be a racist because of that.
And, I feared that my insistence is called a lie by some of the people's prejudices.
So I introduced my 2nd character.
But now, I can't introducing my maincharacter in other reason.
I fear attack from others.
Not only the attack from Vang but also the attack from the Vang's friend is fear.
It differs if it says accurately.
I don't fear the attack.
But I fear my reaction to the attack.
The person who did not know anything might have believed his searchcomment and shout.
I think it is very mean thing.
Some of people (Vang and his friend) denounced a person (Shel).
JP players feels it unfair.
However, Jp players don't want to do the same thing.
It has the problem before credibility.
A lot of Jp people feel it unsightly.
And, both parties of the person that the shout was done with the person who did the
shout are considered to be a person who has the problem.
(原文:そして、シャウトした人と、された人の双方が問題のある人物と断定されます)
Shel's reputation will certainly fall in some measure.
However, it will drop the reputation of Vang at the same time.
I think we should only watch it in Vanadiel.
The third party should not make noise.
We both parties are wishing the finish of this thing.
The attitude that should be taken must be equal though the result of hope is different.
Let's thinking what is the best for each other.
Vang, you said 'considering he can speak decent english'.
But I said several times.
He can't speak English.
And He can't speak English better than me.
But You couldn't understand my English.
So I think you can't understand Shel's English at all.
I'm tired...You are speaking an imagination alone not grounds.
I can not understand your attitude.
Please stop speaking the imagination.
Please speak only your fact.
My purpose isn't to read the fantastic story that you thought about.
Do you have a mind to straighten out that problem really?
Inconvenient thing for you.
You decided that it is the lie.
It is from the imagination.
I want your serious attitude.