Vang the liar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tiamat, I'm truely sorry for the otherwise....poor behavior of some of the people here.
But as for this topic....it's been said, that there's no actual proof...so I'm not gonna really take either side, but I'll just leave it at "I'm sorry", to Vang if this really did happen, to Shel if it did not. I'm hopefully not gonna dignify this topic with my presense from hereon, it's..shameful~
 
Sorry off topic. My main language I consider to be 1. English 2. Spanish 3. Japanese. Yes yes I am japanese but I have lived in Spain for more than 21 years which is 80% of my lifetime. Thats why, I consider myself more European than Japanese.
 
Shit sorry to be off-topic again, but thanks for replying. That is quite interesting. =)
 
Xerius said:
Tiamat, since Japanese people have much better relations with GM, why dont you ask them for the chat log so we can set this score once and for all?

And to Krono and all those other people throwing out rude and insulting blanket statements about the Japanese culture, it isn't making anything better, so please put a cork in it. Thanks

I didn't say shit about JP peoeple in general.

If you really belive this guy you are more gulliable than a fucking two year old.
 
私の陰茎は巨大である

Just wanted to put that out there.. =)

I love google
 
変体;;
that is gross braydon :( to much info ><;;
 
Nasya said:
変体;;
that is gross braydon :( to much info ><;;
Gah.... Wrong kanji ><

変態(者)  is what it was supposed to be ><
 
実はタイマットさん英語のが上手みたいですね。 心配しないでよ(/'▽')/

And lol for google ._.;
 
Tiamat said:
If he did MPK, the account was deprived immediately.
However, he is playing now. Please consider this meaning.

GM's do nothing for us Tiamat, especially if the offender is a JP player.

Tiamat said:
2,Enumerate evidence if you want you to believe.

Evidence = ScreenShot
Evidence = power
This is same in real society,too.
If you have no evidence.
You will become a criminal oppositely.
And now Vang has no evidence.
Please think this meaning.

As Xerius said, it's much easier for Shel to get a picture of the chat log than it is Vang, and I don't see Shel doing that either.
 
TiyaKelth said:
Tiamat said:
If he did MPK, the account was deprived immediately.
However, he is playing now. Please consider this meaning.

GM's do nothing for us Tiamat, especially if the offender is a JP player.

Tiamat said:
2,Enumerate evidence if you want you to believe.

Evidence = ScreenShot
Evidence = power
This is same in real society,too.
If you have no evidence.
You will become a criminal oppositely.
And now Vang has no evidence.
Please think this meaning.

As Xerius said, it's much easier for Shel to get a picture of the chat log than it is Vang, and I don't see Shel doing that either.

Evidence = ScreenShot
Evidence = power
This is same in real society,too.
If you have no evidence.
You will become a criminal oppositely.
And now Vang has no evidence.

Tiya: Exactly.

Tiamat: True, Vang has no evidence, and you are correct for saying that evidence is power, but if you are going to defend your friend, which I respect of you for doing so, it would be courteous to ask Shel for some evidence from him as well. Vang, on the other hand, I'm sure is trying hard to get his own evidence at this time.
 
I will keep contacting GM's until they give me the chat log or they suspend my account. 1 of the 2....I honestly don't see why Shel can't come here and explain, considering he can speak decent english.
 
I think what Tiamat is trying to say is that since Vang is the one bringing up the accusation, the burden of proof is on him to show that Shel is the thief. (I say this not leaning either way, just clarifying his position.)

I, for one, would love to see a GM retrieve all the logs regarding this - that way we can either see Shel twist in the wind over an obvious 8-10 million gil theft, or Vang can try to explain why he kept a lie going for this long without any credence.

But for now, I reserve all judgement. If nothing else, it's been a fun little topic, hasn't it?
 
GMcall.gif


There was a long pause after I first said the incident was on Sunday... I'm going to assume he did a search for any conversations I had, and skimmed through them (There weren't many, I was only on a few mins).

Another long pause after I said it was in Port Jeuno, Sunday night at about 7pm pst... I assume he found it, because he said he's sorry it has happened, pretty much confirming it's true.

I'm a fairly fast typer, and I made my last response immediately... I have the feeling he didn't want that evidence posted at the end. :P
 
Oh, derogatory comments based on national origin are specifically mentioned in the very brief summary of the user agreement in the help desk menu, which is why I mentioned that part specifically.
 
Looks like a blow off to me.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top