- Joined
- Apr 17, 2004
- Messages
- 2,100
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Stamford
- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- Linkshell
- LORDZxOFxCHAOS
- FFXIV
- Osyris
That is why the argument about best QB will never be settled. There are plenty of pro's and con's for both sides. I would say though that PED's while not in the same form, did exist back then. But QBs aren't the only ones taking PED's. Linebackers, D-Linemen, DBs are all exponentially bigger, stronger and faster than even what Marino and Montana played against. In my opinion, the only arguments for QBs before the 70's is the fact that the game was different, it was a smashmouth-run oriented game, and the seasons were shorter. Today's athletes are far superior to athletes of 20 years ago. Very few skill players and even fewer position players from the past would make it in today's game. Notable exceptions being Jim Brown, Walter Peyton, and Jim Marshall.
Edit: And yes, my apology was sincere. No sense being a dick on the internet.
Edit2: Totally forgot my main statement. My argument for Brett Favre in his latest playoff games is that he felt the need to do too much. He did not have the supporting cast to win playoff games, so he put the team on his shoulders and failed. He was clutch in too many other situations to hold a couple of bad playoff games against him so harshly though.
I wouldnt cancel out his positives with the recent negatives. I just use it because i feel he should have been gone a long long time ago.
I think he stuck around just for his numbers to be inflated. When i first felt this way it was a shot in the dark because he was still an american hero..
His recent actions, as in the last 3 retirements, have proven he is all for himself.. Making me believe even more he just stuck around as a washed up QB and very average for the last 10 years.
Though his run a couple years ago was pretty cool until the Giants game in the playoffs.