There I'm talking about 3 different E.T. 1 of which considers our species royalty, and the other 2 are screwing with us.
There I'm talking about 3 different E.T. 1 of which considers our species royalty, and the other 2 are screwing with us.
Depending on which species one encounters. If you're not mentally prepared to encounter either of the 2 i mentioned. You'll either have a heart attack, or fall just short of having one.
Without video games and movies, a good number of us would open fire at them. They are thousands of years ahead of us in technology, they know things we don't know, they know and understand us very well, and they are the biggest liars you'll ever come across if you ever do get to see one.
I'm going to ask the obvious.
Are you talking about the aliens you mentioned in the other thread about 2012?
I'm going to ask the obvious.
Are you talking about the aliens you mentioned in the other thread about 2012?
Are you a scientologist ant?
The money system is in no way designed by aliens. As I assune you haven't actually read up on how the monetary system is created, I will hope to teach you something today.The Money system (Designed by Reptiles) is a form of control, and not a form of order. Not being able to afford materials, or not worth taking financial risks is what keeps us from discovering groundbreaking technology. Scientists need to play by the book or they will lose their careers. Loosing your job is a common fear for everyone who has a career.
While I don't know how things work in the states, Sweden constantly research in ways to increase electricity efficiency, and want to find complete replacement for fossil fuels. Hydro cells is something researched in a lot. I do, however, believe that you're right with most companies in the US not wanting research to be done, as oil is a good source of income. Other then performing research on making wind power more effective, hydro cells and sun cells to be more effective, Sweden is also doing research on making the loss of electricity in each stage to lessen. If I remember right, 80% of the electricity produced is lost as heat, 90% is lost in the power lines, and 10% is lost in the household as heat. The reason for this is that Sweden is one of the leading countries in preserving the country, and by lowering the amount of electricity wasted, it would aid in this. Hence why we consider sun cells and hydro cells an important part in reaching this goal to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses released.In this world, if you Invest you're time into something that would go against the Laws of physics, you'll go against skeptics of the worst type. A Machine that goes against the first laws of Thermal Dynamics and generates 0 point energy, (or Free energy) is against the forces that control us. Harnessing free energy would cost the largest companies in the world many trillions of dollars. There is no real way to put a bill on a machine that can generate electricity without the need for fossil fuels. It benefits those in power to suppress these kinds of technology. Inventors that claim to have made such devices in the past have been killed (Stan Myer, ran his combustion engine in his car using hydro cells.)
While that is true, currency also helps evolving the world more then you may think. Currency actually drives technology forward. Had we not had currency, we would not be where we are today purely technology speaking. Without an economy, large corporations would not aim to better their products in order to make more money. The human species is extremely greedy by nature. While it is true that the economy is the result of that, it is also what drives us forward. If mankind wasn't greedy and didn't care if they live better lives then they live now, they wouldn't aim to make life any better. Thus, technology wouldn't go forward at the same rate it is today, as people wouldn't see a need for technology to move forward. Sure, technology would move forward, but it wouldn't go forward at the rate it is.A free energy machine would put more money in the pockets of consumers giving us other things to focus it on. Still money is a constraint, but the more of it we have, the more experimental we'll be. All and all. Without a currency based system, we would make more things. What separates us from one another is the same force that made us reliant on Money. We've reached a point where no one will work for free, and find no reward in being a part of something that can change the world.
Only ignorant people believe what we're told is right. The smart people find out for themselves what is right. While I'm not going to bash religion, I do believe you are religious as told in the earlier thread. So I find this rather hypocritical coming from you, as you believe God exists simply because you are told he exists.Just about every extra terrestrial race all believe we're spiritual beings we'll carry on and advance spiritually and physically. But our advancement all depends on our mind set. What the world believes is what we're told is correct, and what we read in textbooks. Science and Philosophy should be one in the same, but they are not. Science revolves around what can be proven. But it also creates an environment of fear for some inventors that believe in, and even proven, what they have achieved or set out to accomplish.
Tristam Green said:Anttaru:
Discount that the world has seen more advances in medicine, technology, and .... hell, everything in the past 150 years than has been seen in recorded history? All with monetary systems driving them too?
Shame on you, sir.
Well, it really was stretching the definition of "reality."
Shame for what ? Thinking that fossil fuel as a constant expense slows down our potential for advancement. In many ways it does.
Oil caused a boom for our population and technology. Without Oil, all this technology we enjoy will stop. There's negative and positive in everything. Sure we still advance. But let's not forget who we pick up after, and who'll have to pick up after us. Your question is more of an assumption than anything. Lets not assume i said we haven't advanced.
While I don't know how things work in the states,
Uzor said:Sweden constantly research in ways to increase electricity efficiency, and want to find complete replacement for fossil fuels. Hydro cells is something researched in a lot. I do, however, believe that you're right with most companies in the US not wanting research to be done, as oil is a good source of income.
Uzor said:Other then performing research on making wind power more effective, hydro cells and sun cells to be more effective, Sweden is also doing research on making the loss of electricity in each stage to lessen. If I remember right, 80% of the electricity produced is lost as heat, 90% is lost in the power lines, and 10% is lost in the household as heat. The reason for this is that Sweden is one of the leading countries in preserving the country, and by lowering the amount of electricity wasted, it would aid in this. Hence why we consider sun cells and hydro cells an important part in reaching this goal to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses released.
For example, the state of Sweden have decided that all public busses in Stockholm (and probable outside as well) should be driven by Methane, or preferably something even better if a better alternative is found. While Methane by itself is considered a greenhouse gas, the byproduct by burning it together with O2 is better then using gasoline itself. The formula for that is CH4 + 2O2 → CO2 + 2H2O. While it still releases CO2 (bad), it also produces water (good). Additionally, our government encourages people to use public transportation or bicycles instead of cars to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses released. Wherever you want to go in Stockholm, you can bicycle there, as we have a separate bicycling road besides almost every walking pavement or road. If you so chose, you can pretty much walk anywhere as well. Long-distant travels within Sweden is also encouraged by taking the train instead of flying or taking the car. People are also encouraged pretty much everywhere in Sweden to sort their garbage, and fast food stores are encouraging more people to eat more healthy food by giving healthier menu options. One of our fast food chains called "Max", even have low-GI Burgers, so that people that wish to lose weight can still eat their food without having to worry about gaining weight. (GI stands for Glycemic Index, and can be read about here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycemic_index)
Uzor said:My point is, you make it sound like those large companies control the world, and everyone want to keep oil and fossil fuel because they are money-greeding whores.
Uzor said:A great deal of people in Sweden (including our government) would LOVE to find an alternative source of power, and a lot of people donate money towards that cause.
Uzor said:While that is true, currency also helps evolving the world more then you may think. Currency actually drives technology forward. Had we not had currency, we would not be where we are today purely technology speaking. Without an economy, large corporations would not aim to better their products in order to make more money. The human species is extremely greedy by nature. While it is true that the economy is the result of that, it is also what drives us forward. If mankind wasn't greedy and didn't care if they live better lives then they live now, they wouldn't aim to make life any better. Thus, technology wouldn't go forward at the same rate it is today, as people wouldn't see a need for technology to move forward. Sure, technology would move forward, but it wouldn't go forward at the rate it is.
Uzor said:Only ignorant people believe what we're told is right. The smart people find out for themselves what is right. While I'm not going to bash religion, I do believe you are religious as told in the earlier thread. So I find this rather hypocritical coming from you, as you believe God exists simply because you are told he exists.
Uzor said:And no, you're wrong. That science revolves around what can be proven is a myth.
Uzor said:Science revolves around looking for ways to DISPROVE something. Simply proving something is right is not science, as that only proves something is correct under that specific condition. However, disproving something means that said theory is incorrect, and the scientists can then either find a new theory, or rewrite it to fit the new conditions. As soon as something is disproved, it means that the theory is wrong. Thus, it is scientifically impossible to prove something is right.
Uzor said:Science revolves around theories, nothing else.
No I'm not a scientologist. Although i do admire them. Everything they are about is self improvement and world peace. So what if they believe in Aliens. Unless the existence of E.T.'s are proven or dis-proven, it would be sheepish to ridicule them.