hmmm, wtf? this is the sickest video ever

Pascal said:
Strid from my father, while there were cases of civilian doing the actions you described, it were not everybody body over there and in most cases the civilian performing theses actions where not loyal to either side. They knew if they did not corporate with either side, that there would be retribution, thus they played both sides of the field to survive.
Click to expand...

I know the deal but I guess some people see things a little differently than others. If you never know who side they are on they are a threat not an innocent civilian from their stand point and I agree to that.
 
1.Who are buying the products comming from these animals?
2. Is the demand reason for the killing?
3. Would gassing the animals then skinning them be better?


This video almost made me throw up. I could not watch the rest of it. The questions above are the things that came up while I was watching.

Thank you for posting the video. Eye openner. I wish I could directly make a difference.


Daremo
 
Strid said:
Pascal said:
Strid from my father, while there were cases of civilian doing the actions you described, it were not everybody body over there and in most cases the civilian performing theses actions where not loyal to either side. They knew if they did not corporate with either side, that there would be retribution, thus they played both sides of the field to survive.
Click to expand...

I know the deal but I guess some people see things a little differently than others. If you never know who side they are on they are a threat not an innocent civilian from their stand point and I agree to that.
Click to expand...

You treat them as a threat from a safety standpoint; until you can be assured they are not a thread. You do not kill them just because you assume they may be a thread. Collective Penalties are against the Geneva Convention.

Geneva Convention said:
collective penalties

Civilians must not be punished for offenses that they personally did not commit. Collective penalties, intimidation and penalties against civilian populations are prohibited. (Convention IV, Art. 33)
Click to expand...

You should also consider that when a police office pulls you over, he does not know if you are a threat or not. Should he shot first and ask questions later?
 
Pascal said:
Collective Penalties are against the Geneva Convention.

Geneva Convention said:
collective penalties

Civilians must not be punished for offenses that they personally did not commit. Collective penalties, intimidation and penalties against civilian populations are prohibited. (Convention IV, Art. 33)
Click to expand...

You should also consider that when a police office pulls you over, he does not know if you are a threat or not. Should he shot first and ask questions later?
Click to expand...

Just wanted to point out that that GC amendment was intended to keep punative actions from happening to civilians. For example, if we had Nuked the middle east till the sand became glass because of 9/11 like some people wanted, it would have been against this GC amendment.
 
alanon said:
Pascal said:
Collective Penalties are against the Geneva Convention.

Geneva Convention said:
collective penalties

Civilians must not be punished for offenses that they personally did not commit. Collective penalties, intimidation and penalties against civilian populations are prohibited. (Convention IV, Art. 33)
Click to expand...

You should also consider that when a police office pulls you over, he does not know if you are a threat or not. Should he shot first and ask questions later?
Click to expand...



Just wanted to point out that that GC amendment was intended to keep punative actions from happening to civilians. For example, if we had Nuked the middle east till the sand became glass because of 9/11 like some people wanted, it would have been against this GC amendment.
Click to expand...

Blanket killing of civilians who have not personally committed an act of aggression is covered all over the place. That was only one article that applied.
 
Hmmmm Is the video on the webpage?

Because i cant watch it, i was hoping it was something i could right click and save
 
Davio said:
Hmmmm Is the video on the webpage?

Because i cant watch it, i was hoping it was something i could right click and save
Click to expand...
Um... unless you like seeing a small animal getting skinned alive, you don't want to watch this.
 
Bajaratt said:
Davio said:
Hmmmm Is the video on the webpage?

Because i cant watch it, i was hoping it was something i could right click and save
Click to expand...
Um... unless you like seeing a small animal getting skinned alive, you don't want to watch this.
Click to expand...

Unless you want to see small animals, a dog, and probably a third animal getting skinned alive you don't want to watch this. I didn't watch this. I stopped watching after be hit the dog with the knife and it got paralyzed <.<
 
ok, obviously no one understands that, I don't care about the animals, I don't hate Asia, and I don't care what America does, I don't even really feel proud being American. So you can all quit bitching, i don't care, i was kidding, and lieing, shut up
 
just a correction: I watched this, but stopped about 1/3rd through when the dog came <.<
 
Pascal said:
Strid said:
Pascal said:
Strid from my father, while there were cases of civilian doing the actions you described, it were not everybody body over there and in most cases the civilian performing theses actions where not loyal to either side. They knew if they did not corporate with either side, that there would be retribution, thus they played both sides of the field to survive.
Click to expand...

I know the deal but I guess some people see things a little differently than others. If you never know who side they are on they are a threat not an innocent civilian from their stand point and I agree to that.
Click to expand...

You treat them as a threat from a safety standpoint; until you can be assured they are not a thread. You do not kill them just because you assume they may be a thread. Collective Penalties are against the Geneva Convention.

Geneva Convention said:
collective penalties

Civilians must not be punished for offenses that they personally did not commit. Collective penalties, intimidation and penalties against civilian populations are prohibited. (Convention IV, Art. 33)
Click to expand...

You should also consider that when a police office pulls you over, he does not know if you are a threat or not. Should he shot first and ask questions later?
Click to expand...

Good point but during war times I would think that having to worry about others would be a henderance to the reason you are there. Doe it make it right? No but nothing is right about war if you want to look at it fom that view. Anyway good point there I wished everyone had the ability to drive home something like you do maybe there would be less flames.
 
ok, i say thank you to all the people who talked about the video, and not my comments

first those are my opinions, if you don't disagree, well than, thats great for you

second i wasn't even serious about my comments

vietnam was a mistake, and very poorly planned out

i don't hate history

actually, most of the poor nations like cambodia, do they shit all the time, and much worse stuff, just to make money. hell, they have little 6 year old girls having sex for money, and the cops don't do anything because they are all corrupt, same with most parts of indonesia
 
Jesus christ wtf kinda post is this. That video was disguisting. I really dont understand how this belongs on these forums at all.
 
Daremo said:
1.Who are buying the products comming from these animals?
2. Is the demand reason for the killing?
3. Would gassing the animals then skinning them be better?


This video almost made me throw up. I could not watch the rest of it. The questions above are the things that came up while I was watching.

Thank you for posting the video. Eye openner. I wish I could directly make a difference.


Daremo
Click to expand...

To answer you:

1: People who sell fur coats.
2: Yes...but do so more nicely...like a bullet to the head first maybe?
3: No, Shoot them it's less painful in the end.

I'm not an animal lover as a matter of fact I think they are only here for two reasons. One being to eat the other being to kill off other animals and people (ie: sharks, snakes etc.). However, this is just cruel...The animal will eventually die after this so what's so hard about taking 3 seconds longer to put a bullet in his head before you start...
 
scary said:
http://www.peta.org/feat/moorefield/

http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2003/gibson/qtr3/0905.htm
PETA sucks

http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2003/gibson/qtr3/0903.htm
PETA sucks

read those

PETA kills your pets
Click to expand...

I don't get how PETA sucks or is so bad..Mind you I had no idea of PETAs being until today. It seems as if they post stuff about how others are cruel to animals to try and stop it. How's this bad and how do they kill pets by trying to make animal safety ? I don't get it.
 
ok, it said in one of the articles, that the made a facility, where they had employees and voluteers go out, round up stray animals even animals with tags on them, bring them back to the facility where they put the animal to sleep. they steal pets off of peoples yards and kill them too. PETA is also terrorist, they had a sub group Striaght Edges or something, and one person killed a 15 year old kid because he wasn't a vegetarian. Also, they brain wash their employees and force them to watch videos like the first one i posted. PETA only uses less than, i think, 15% of their total donations, which are about 23 million dollars, to actually stop animal cruelty.
 
scary said:
ok, it said in one of the articles, that the made a facility, where they had employees and voluteers go out, round up stray animals even animals with tags on them, bring them back to the facility where they put the animal to sleep. they steal pets off of peoples yards and kill them too. PETA is also terrorist, they had a sub group Striaght Edges or something, and one person killed a 15 year old kid because he wasn't a vegetarian. Also, they brain wash their employees and force them to watch videos like the first one i posted. PETA only uses less than, i think, 15% of their total donations, which are about 23 million dollars, to actually stop animal cruelty.
Click to expand...

So there whole website and corporation is a fake to what they stand for ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top