I want an explaination as to why exactly was i banned for.

[Davion]

I don't think I need to say why this should have been left in PMs.

inbeforelockandshitstormv2

 

[Makelith]

If anyone is giving any sort of RL attack on the flameboard, please report the post. That goes as much for WSM, as it does every other user. Officially, it is merely a slap on the wrist and slightly against the guidelines.

I encourage anyone and everyone to throw their 2 cents in on this thread here.

 

[Malagra]

A singer, yes. Quite successful even.

Sang the theme used in the last Kingdom Hearts commercials I think.

All the KH commercials I think.

She did Simple and Clean which was the theme for KH1. Like Passion, there are two different versions, but at least for S&C those are named the same.

 

[JP]

If anyone is giving any sort of RL attack on the flameboard, please report the post. That goes as much for WSM, as it does every other user. Officially, it is merely a slap on the wrist and slightly against the guidelines.

I encourage anyone and everyone to throw their 2 cents in on this thread here.

Figured it was for this reason...

You are WSM, any questions?

Was hoping it was this one though ; ;.

 

[Miros]

Woop de dooo. And why did i get the infraction?. You still haven't explained to me. I didn't harass him. I insulted his capabilities for a particular position. Just like he insulted my level of intelligence.

When you prove to me that you sent 20 PMs, I'll explain to you the infraction in more depth? :3

 

[Audino]

You received the 10 point infraction for violating the rules regarding RL attacks. If instead of saying "WSM is an idiot", I had instead said "I hope WSM's mom dies of cancer", then I'd be the one with the 10 point infraction.

Incorrect. It was for excessive material. RL attacks are currently not against the FB Guidelines. There's a thread about it in S&F, however.

Edit: Sorry Mak, I didn't see you already plugged the thread. -.^

 

[Mishaela]

Incorrect. It was for excessive material. RL attacks are currently not against the FB Guidelines. There's a thread about it in S&F, however.

Edit: Sorry Mak, I didn't see you already plugged the thread. -.^

Aw, I was hoping I contributed to his ban. =/

 

[Bajaratt]

Incorrect. It was for excessive material. RL attacks are currently not against the FB Guidelines. There's a thread about it in S&F, however.

Edit: Sorry Mak, I didn't see you already plugged the thread. -.^

Yeah, apparently he didn't even bother to go read why he was banned before he started bitching about it. Typical idiot behavior.

Let this be a reminder to everyone as well. Please avoid excessive spamming on ANY boards. This does include the flameboard. We do have a multiquote button to help avoid excessive spamming. If anyone is having trouble with the function, please feel free to contact a moderator regarding it at your leisure.

While spamming was a reason for the read-only, excessive and inappropriate material also come into play. 2 week ban for excessive inappropriateness.

 

[Tim Wakefield]

RL attacks are currently not against the FB Guidelines.

Orly?

3. RL Personal Threats - strictly forbidden
[These are the threats in an accusatory active voice, or future perfect if the idea is to circumvent the rule.

There will be no: "I will kill you.", "I will hurt you.", "I bet you would not fight me to back up your words." Baiting a RL threat response is not kosher. If you're discussing Dynamis, KSNM, Ballista etc... obviously "I will kill you" is not that same as a RL threat.

Any other possible permutations/combinations of making a threat, the action of detailing a personal intent to harm someone's RL physical state or RL property state, will be moderated and dealt with.]

More importantly, I'm pissed that you can edit on the FB now. I'm calling moderation abuse!!

 

[Tristam Green]

It never ceases to amaze me how some persons feel they're owed an explanation for punishment resultant from their own stupid behavior.

And before you attempt to say "OMG RL attack he should be banned immediately", WSM, I implore you to comprehend that I didn't say you are stupid, but that your behavior was.

 

[Raesvelg]

Incorrect. It was for excessive material. RL attacks are currently not against the FB Guidelines. There's a thread about it in S&F, however.

Ah, I'd assumed that was the "excessive material" in question. Not technically a real-life attack, true, but arguably a bit beyond the pale.

Are you a lawyer? you sure sound like one.

No.

And you saying that you didn't follow me around in every single thread, is plain BS.

No, it's the truth. You had entire topics on the flameboard I never went near, largely because I knew what was going to be in them (pointless spam) and didn't want to waste my time. I think I bothered replying to you in all of 5 threads total. 6 if you count the one where you failed at stalking and attacking me.

Do i really have to dig up every single post and post it here, which has a response similar to mine shown above.

It would probably help your case, though just using the report post function might save you time in the future.

 

[Sneakypants]

meh my very 1st rate down wasted on wsm

Seems pretty appropriate to me.

 

[Kotsu]

Wait, if I send Miros 20 PM's will I get banned?

i'm doing it. Not like he can't mass delete them anyway XD

 

[Kotsu]

Check that, I'm bored after 2. I guess I'll just... work... -.-;;


Oh, btw, why was WSM banned? Some seriously fucked up things have been said by multiple people on the website before, dunno how severe it is of whatever he said repeatedly to deserve it. I know I've said some things that, magically, I was never called out on.

 

[Ruffyreborn]

Check that, I'm bored after 2. I guess I'll just... work... -.-;;


Oh, btw, why was WSM banned? Some seriously fucked up things have been said by multiple people on the website before, dunno how severe it is of whatever he said repeatedly to deserve it. I know I've said some things that, magically, I was never called out on.

Its different when someone isnt liked by the majority of the community... Not to say thats fair, but its how it works here and everywhere else. If people like you more, youll generally get away with more things

And everyone knows Kotsu is teh sex

 

[Tok]

Thanks. Anyways, when you said "demolish" you know it is harassment and inappropriate right?. Should be banned imo.

wsm is the only mfker i know that will derail HIS OWN THREAD on the first fucking page

:facepalm:

 

[Dancingweapon]

I'm sorry if this sounds a little bit harsh. But come on guys we are ALL thinking it.

Can you name 10 friends of yours?

 

[Eleibfrid]

In reply to the thread title:

'cause you're a fucking moron.

 

[Zyndara]

Its different when someone isnt liked by the majority of the community... Not to say thats fair, but its how it works here and everywhere else. If people like you more, youll generally get away with more things

It isn't so much about who's liked and who isn't. It's about someone's bahavior in general. If you're a person who does something on a very rare occasion because you slip or were having a crap day or whatever, that's very different from someone who is consistently doing the same things, or a variety of the same things, that are against the rules. That's why those decisions are left to the mod staff. It's a lot easier to be lenient on someone who isn't relentlessly giving you a reason to punish them than on someone who is pretty in-your-face about it. And that's not unique to these boards, it's the way the world works; look around.

 

[NeogearzX]

lawlercakes