One would think an argumentative person like yourself would explain *why* you thought it was stupid rather than simply taking a dismissive attitude. Especially since he similarly thought *your* argument was stupid and actually explained why. You obviously both think the other's argument is stupid, but I'll give props to the one who went on to give a reason.
(In case you're curious as to what I'm talking about, you never actually came up with a counterpoint to his very valid point that
Jamal himself was the only person you actually needed to prove anything to - if the peanut gallery had wanted proof, they would've asked for it after all.)