Nothing in this is convincing me of anything. Any benefit from dual wield is lost by the loss of double attack, berserk, and warcry. If your argument is "lol I do too much dmg and pull hate too fast", then you aren't a very good dd and I wouldn't invite you to my pt anyway. A good dd does enough dmg to kill quickly without pulling hate like a jackass. If you start the fight with 1200 dmg, you deserve to die. I've always said that /THF is situational, but nothing will convince me that /NIN beats /WAR for blu.
then me:
Forget the Dual-Wield argument, survivability is enough. You can't list Warcry/Beserk/DA/etc as reasons to sub War, then tell him he's a crappy DD because he does too much Dmg as /Nin....
then Rappa:
Er, yes I can. If he plans to Berserk->Warcry->WS at the start of the fight then he fails at blu/war as much as he fails at blu/nin. Just having the abilities isn't as important as knowing how and when to use them. DDing really isn't complicated, guys.
me:
Ok, so he subs Nin, does more overall damage than /war and never gets a scratch. Explain again how /war is better?
Rappa:
Where is the "does more overall damage than /war" part coming from?
me:
Have you not been reading Uzor's posts?
Then you apparently comming out of left field still harping on the damn dual-wield crap.