I don't want to make QCDN a membership only site. I don't see that it provides enough content to warrant a mandatory subscription fee. Most pay sites rely on their membership contributing content the membership is paying to access. Often that results in 749406306436428 people posting "someone post something useful!" and the guy who runs the site counting his 49493629 * $20/year.
I am considering to add another subscription level (maybe like $4.99/year) and limit access to the AH and the ES to those who are subscribed at that level. For now that's just a thought though.
Anyway, I am for improving quality, not everyone is though. Many of those who are, are also not willing to put in effort to improve QCDN for those who are not, and who could blame them? I certainly don't.
See:
QCDN [How-To] tutorials wanted - a simple request, not much work would have to go into it, 30 minutes per tut tops, yet there are none. Considering that, I just don't see how a mandatory membership would produce enough content to warrant a membership fee.
My goal used to be to increase traffic, and user count, and whatnot. This has changed. I would rather have 100 users who get along and engage in forum activity for mutual benefit, than 10,000 users who turn QCDN into zero information content a la offtopic.com and like.
There is another angle to this that is worth mentioning. The FB produces significant traffic, thus consuming considerable server resources (memory, anyone?), while producing very little content. In addition those who are FB campers, are most all of the time those who do not financially contribute to running this service. To sum this up, resources are consumed, but no reasonable offset is provided (either content worth reading, or financial contributions). While I didn't have that in mind when I first brought the question up, it was pointed out to me by PM, and I couldn't escape the logic, thus here it is.