Some People Are Dumb

[Uzor]

Saying it's "not gay" is the dumbest crock of shit I've ever read. Sorry. No matter how you cut it you're either porking a fat, ugly chick or you're gay. That's all there is to it. You're also somehow homophobic for choosing the straight answer (which is also a huge crock of bullshit).

I know a lot of you still haven't come out of the closet, but even playing the damned game and choosing a man is gay. No ifs, ands, or buts.

Wouldn't it technically be "Closet bi?" or did bisexuallity dissapear from earth while I was sleeping?

Well, something you have to realise: It'd be alot less embarrassing to your buddies if you fuck a hot guy then some ugly, fat ass chick. I mean seriously, how many times have you given a friend shit for some broad he hooked up with while drunk? Exactly. Now, let's say same friend fucked Brad Pitt. Sure, it was a gay thing to do, but hey, he fucked Brad Pitt. Props to him. And it makes a much better story.

Not many people can say they screwed Brad Pitt. I'm rather sure my friends would tease me in a joking way (like how Pakomen said), and my female friends would be highly jelous.

 

[Halifirien]

I don't think it necessarily means you're a raging homophobe for picking a grotesque woman who has to wash herself with a rag on a stick over Brad Pitt. I think that only applies when you go apeshit and start screeching like a scalded cat at the very idea that Brad Pitt could be a better lay.

The reason why so many gay men are convinced they have a shot with the straight male populace is simple experience. I'm at the point now where I don't assume anyone is gay or straight, no matter what they say. I placed a personal ad once and identified myself as gay, and it was like ringing a dinner bell for all these closeted married guys who all said the same thing: "I need to be discreet." Uh-huh... buh-bye.

So the straight guys are caught in a Catch-22. If they're 100% hetero and go nuts trying to convince everyone they are, guys like me will look askance at them, grin and say "Riiiiiiiiight." The level of sarcasm we place on that is directly proportional to just how much effort they use to convince everyone they'd never go near cock unless you dragged them kicking and screaming.

Added: And for the people who say you're gay for a one-time sexual encounter with Brad Pitt, you're full of it. My high school girlfriend and I used to fuck like bunnies. It doesn't mean I'm any less gay.

 

[Rinoah]

I predict before page 25 someone will point out (or claim if you prefer) that the straight guys are afraid they'll enjoy brads ass. Someone other than me and my prediction of course.

Somewhat on the same issue though; what about people who claim to be gay\bi\straight who haven't actually had any interaction with said genders?

Just a thought as my sister knows a guy who seems to alternate depending on which day of the week it is (I think he went gay-bi-gay-straight-bi-gay-bi...all without any sexual interaction with either gender lol). And on the less highschool confuses children front i have a friend who claims to be bi but has slept with like 40-50 guys and 0 women lol.

I suppose you could argue it is what you are attracted to, but at what point is attraction defining your gender choices if you haven't really got much\any sexual desire for them?

 

[Tomasello]

DUMB ASS, that wasn't a ranking. That was a list, in order of appearance. LOLOLOLOL. You fail.

So your a liar too you dumb fuck? Go back to the post, it was an order of people you wanted shot. Apparently, I rank above a person who wants to murder homosexuals for fun.

I'm a dick to people like you, Tom. Why? You deserve it.

Why do I deserve it? Cause I don't agree with you? When have I ever said anything bad to you before this thread? Your just a bomb-throwing moron who gets off trolls threads. 8000+ posts and not a single intelligent word has ever come out of your stupid face.


Biggest idiots to ever appear on QCDN.org:

1) Sneakypants
2) Colbwa
3) Roofie

 

[Myrrh]

Hey hey hey now. I believe you're forgetting the other idiots of Qcdn. If you're going to be a dick and add Sneaky then add the rest too. Jesus man, be fair or GTFO.

 

[Rinoah]

Biggest idiots to ever appear on QCDN.org:

1) Sneakypants
2) Colbwa
3) Roofie
4) Myrrh

Hey hey hey now. I believe you're forgetting the other idiots of Qcdn. If you're going to be a dick and add Sneaky then add the rest too. Jesus man, be fair or GTFO.

Fixed <3.

 

[Myrrh]

Ow....my pride. I'mma go listen to some Linkin Park now ; ;

 

[Rinoah]

Ow....my pride. I'mma go listen to some Linkin Park now ; ;

Don't forget your razor dear.

 

[K. Ishitar]

<3's! ^_^

& lol at that picture, Khidir. Did you notice the taru near me is named 'Office'?

heheh I noticed when i took that shot everyone started heading my direction at the mention of my ass

 

[Stouter]

I predict before page 25 someone will point out (or claim if you prefer) that the straight guys are afraid they'll enjoy brads ass. Someone other than me and my prediction of course.

I'll definately agree with this, I'm sure many homophobes are so adamant about it because they have it in their head that it's so wrong, but find themselves attracted to people of the same sex. They need to hide their feelings by saying that they hate everyone who is that way.

I'm a libertarian at heart. If you wanna do drugs go ahead, it doesn't mean I'll make the same choice. If you wanna be gay/bisexual, do what makes you happy. Hell I don't even care about polygamy or beastiality, so long as every person involved is ok with it. I don't give a crap about animal rights (especially the tasty animals), and the only problems I have with polygamy is that it's forced upon people that aren't willing participants in most of the cults/"religions" where it's practiced. As long as there's no victim I don't care what consenting adults do, pediphilia does not fit into this category.

The "moral majority" has always bugged me. The freedom of religion in the US isn't what most people think it was originally intended to be. It wasn't people wanting a place where anyone could practice their own religion, it was meant for a community to practice a specific religion that was unacceptable elsewhere, while shunning all others. The moral majority is just another group of religous despots that are imposing their system of values onto others. That in itself goes against my belief structure.

 

[Uzor]

I predict before page 25 someone will point out (or claim if you prefer) that the straight guys are afraid they'll enjoy brads ass. Someone other than me and my prediction of course.

Somewhat on the same issue though; what about people who claim to be gay\bi\straight who haven't actually had any interaction with said genders?

Just a thought as my sister knows a guy who seems to alternate depending on which day of the week it is (I think he went gay-bi-gay-straight-bi-gay-bi...all without any sexual interaction with either gender lol). And on the less highschool confuses children front i have a friend who claims to be bi but has slept with like 40-50 guys and 0 women lol.

I suppose you could argue it is what you are attracted to, but at what point is attraction defining your gender choices if you haven't really got much\any sexual desire for them?

Quoted this for truth.

 

[Sneakypants]

Because I dont want to have sex with a man, no matter how grotesque the woman is, im wrong? That doesnt make any sense at all. Who cares if you can alter the dude to look like a woman? He's still a dude. One act of homosexuality may not make you a homo for life, but youre a homosexual for that moment. I am a straight man. I've never had a homosexual thought. I dont care if other people do, but I really dont think i'm wrong because I'd rather have sex with a woman than a man.

EDIT: Ontop of that, youre getting pretty way out with these scenarios. I believe the original question was would you rather do a 700lbs chick or Brad Pitt. Not would you do a surgically altered brad pitt or a 700lbs disease ridden woman who no one would ever fuck anyway. So I dont know where youre coming from with all this psycho babble. It boils down to this. You have sex with someone of the same gender as you; youre gay. You have sex with both genders, youre bi. You have sex with the opposite gender, youre straight. When did it become wrong to be straight?

I think this is further than need be (if we can even say that about this thread any more). It's not wrong to be anything. The way you mention how you feel about, you're saying you don't have a problem with what others do. Making your own choice, you've just stated that's what you'd choose. You didn't feel compelled to reinforce your own sexuality and try and point out where others were flawed.

Let's please remember that this started from a hypothetical question. I gave my answer and reasons and a macho man PMed me because he didn't like my answer. Here we are.

 

[Sneakypants]

The problem here is everyone is tryin to label themselves and other people as gay or homophobe. I have no desire to have sex with a guy; does that make me a homophobe? If so, why?

No, it doesn't.
This started with labels, but if you can't see the difference in how you're acting about versus how Tom or lolBlancho are acting about it, I can't explain it further. Those guys have issues defending their manliness over hypothetical situations.

You've just said you like titties a whole lot. Which is obvious if you'd fuck that huge chick. Repeating how much people like titties is an interesting thing, you know if it's not that big a deal to talk about this hypothetical situation, but still you don't rank up with people who are clearly homophobic at all.

 

[Halifirien]

You've just said you like titties a whole lot. Which is obvious if you'd fuck that huge chick.

And to be completely fair, a woman who has obviously spent a lot of her spare time sucking down that much food probably has some arcane oral skills that would drive you out your mind. Brad Pitt is a sexy man, but you know that chick gives better head.

 

[Uzor]

And to be completely fair, a woman who has obviously spent a lot of her spare time sucking down that much food probably has some arcane oral skills that would drive you out your mind. Brad Pitt is a sexy man, but you know that chick gives better head.

Well, in all honesty, most women suck at giving head. And not suck in a good way. So either that fat woman must be good at it, because that's all the love she's giving, or she sucks because no one wants to have sex with her anyway.

Either way, I'd guess that gay men are the best at giving head, as they have a dick themselves and know what men like. So I'd guess Brad Pitt would be slightly better, assuming neither of them never gave anyone a blow job.

 

[Halifirien]

Either way, I'd guess that gay men are the best at giving head, as they have a dick themselves and know what men like.

We do, but my mother taught me not to brag. :nono:

 

[Rinoah]

We do, but my mother taught me not to brag. :nono:

I was told by a gay guy that you get two ice cubes and stick them in the corners of your mouth and....y'know what lets just move on ^_^.

Like i said earlier i'd be too afraid she'd mistake my dick for a sausage and take a bite outta it.

 

[Artem]

After reading this thread, I have realized one thing (other than the fact that I lost brain cells reading Tom's and Sneaky's retarded argument).

QCDN's collective understanding of homosexuality is very very skewed. You guys, and correct me if I'm wrong, believe that your homosexuality is defined by who you sleep with now, at this very time, not who you slept with in the past.

Well I would like to ask you, since when does homosexuality requires sex to be defined? Homosexuality is being attracted to the same gender. You do not have to have sex with that gender to be homosexual. While yes, having sex would also suggest physical attraction, sex is an outcome of that physical attraction.

Having said that, I do not see how willingly choosing a guy to have sex with does not make you gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay; however, if you can get your dick hard for another man and you can fuck him willingly, than you are gay.

Now, many of you say that one experience does not make you gay, but that one experiences requires attraction, which defines homosexuality.

It does make you gay if you were at any time attracted to a guy. I don't mean you just said Brad Pitt looks hot. There is nothing wrong with saying someone of the same gender is good looking. You can say someone is good looking while having no attraction to the said person.

Also a "Closet Gay" is defined by someone who has attraction towards the same gender, while refusing to acknowledge it and continues to seek partners of opposite sex.

In other words, if you can get your dick hard for Brad Pitt, how can you deny that you have homosexual tendencies?

There is a clear definition of homosexuality, it is defined by the majority of your peers.

Let me make an anology here.

Being straight is like virginity, it only takes one time.

If you want to be homosexual, great more power to you. Don't go around and start insulting people who defend their choice of gender.

Through this topic, I saw people who I assume to be homosexual (mostly cause they said they are) convince people that it's not homosexual to have sex with another man. You guys are imposing on people your choice. That is unfair to do, you of all people should not be doing it, considering how many straight people try to impose their views on you.

That being said, while Tom may not have used the best of words to argue, he however is not at fault. He was insulted and attacked for his opinion, so he proceeded to defend it.

Oh and the guy who said we should shoot all the gays and lesbians. On behalf of a lot of people I'd like to tell you, I hope you get ran over by a large truck several times. You, sir, are worthless trash.

 

[Nasya]

Just want to correct one thing you said art One sexual act with someone of the same gender does not automatically make someone homosexual... at most it would make them bi-sexual... or perhaps only bi-curious. The only way someone would become homosexual was if, within the span of that act, they lost the ability to be attracted to someone of the opposite sex. You took it a litttttttttttle too far.

 

[Vilurum]

A lot of stuff

Flip your argument around. Say that a self-professed gay guy, comfortably admitting to himself and others that he's generally attracted to men and not to women, at one point in his life finds himself attracted to a woman and has sex with her.

Does this suddenly make him straight, in spite of everything else in his life?

You can no more say that an otherwise-straight man, who has gay sex once, is now "gay" than you can say that an otherwise-gay man, who has straight sex once, is now "straight".

There's more to sexuality than just a black and white, this-or-that, picture with nice friendly labels on it. If you insist on a label for your example, then probably most of us fall under the category of "technically bisexual but 99.999% predominantly gay/straight".

You're right that a straight guy who has gay sex once is no longer 100% straight, but there's a difference between 99.999% straight and 100% gay.

And I figure the 99.999% people can just round to 100% when it comes to labelling themselves, for all the difference that one encounter would really make. Ultimately, your self-label for sexuality (if you even give yourself one) is all that matters. Those whom you are predominantly attracted to (physically and emotionally) determine your sexuality, and there's no rule saying there can't be exceptions.

It's a lot like taking this example to a stronger extreme: you're usually attracted to brunettes, but one time you saw this knockout blonde and were attracted to her. This does not in any way change the fact that you're still usually attracted to brunettes.