The intelligent thing to have done would be to wait until you play the game before arguing about its quality when all you have to go on is pure bias.
The intelligent thing to have done would be to wait until you play the game before arguing about its quality when all you have to go on is pure bias.
The intelligent thing to have done would be to wait until you play the game before arguing about its quality when all you have to go on is pure bias.
There are factors that have to be considered.
First, there's more out there, entertainment-wise that I want than I can afford to spend. High def projectors, a PSP with a TV-out, several PS3/360 games, many blu-ray movies...
I can't buy a game that I anticipate I won't like just because there's a chance I might end up liking it.
Then, considering everyone loves this very mediocre demo to death, I can only assume people are going to love the game. If people disliked the demo the same as I did, and then turned around and loved the game, then I could theorize the demo was just a bad show. Unfortunately, that won't be possible, because people cheer for this demo too damn much.
Sure, consider the demo's dilemma. For many games, the demo just shows the gameplay and the actual game is in the level design. Take for example, Pixeljunk Monsters/Eden, Gripshift... all of them were so-so on the demo, but when I got to the medium and difficult levels, they were my favorite games of this gen... I can't be sure that Star Wars: TFU isn't the same way... but, it's a $60 game to try out, not a $10 - and I can't buy every single new release hoping to find a gem in the rough.
But none of you have played the "game". Just a Demo. Tales of Vesperia demo was absolutely boring and terrible because they had most the characters, moves, and everything else locked down. That game is awesome!
After playing that game in store yesterday, i'm gonna have to disagree with you on that. They made it from a "Tales of" game and made it in to another generic JRPG. Yet another game i was hoping would be good, but got next gen'd.
Well I got my new copy of EGM today. They gave SWFU a score of C. They said that the game has a pretty good story, but gets kinda hard in the later levels. They were upset that you can't just molest everything you see in the later levels w/ their force powers. So that should be a positive for those who said the demo was far too easy even on hard difficulty. I will probably still pick up this title because I really enjoyed Jedi Academy on xbox. This seems to be a step up from it.
Don't mind Fire, he's got a problem with me rating him down because he critisized the demo and picked it apart for everything that he felt was wrong with it.. which was everything in his opinion.
He's just sore because I don't agree. I feel the game is going to be great, and hey, less than 10 days left until it's release.
Honestly, you don't have to have played the demo to form an opinion. I then played the demo, and felt stronger about it. There were minor camera issues, but once I got used to the way it (the demo) played it really wasn't disappointing. I will also say that I have not really played too many fully 3 dimensional games that utilize the camera in such a way as TFU does before playing the demo. Therefore it took me some time to get used to the controls, it will still take me a little time once I actually own the game to get familiar with the camera vs. character articulation once again. I really am not quite used to having full control of the camera while playing such an action orientated game.