Flaming the flameboard - [Moved by Arc]

You're an idiot. We're in the FB which is meant entirely for FF related topics and... well, seriously, you're an idiot.

k.

So by using logic to dispel what you're beating the drums for (that we need to stop removing posts from the flameboard that aren't part of FF-related flames), I get called an idiot.

Perfect sense, 10/10 behavior from Lavi.

I'll remember my idiocy the next time you bitch that someone's posted a completely irrelevant "inb4" post or an lolcats picture.
 
You're telling me a flame which consisted of a pic with ";| BoL" in /say was evidence? Not that that's even the issue. A thread in which the perpetrator is clear cut and blatant provides nothing for the audience. There's no room for a response, nothing to say besides "That sucks", "I'm sorry to hear", etc. That's not entertainment, that's a fucking funeral for me to express my condolences. You want a place for that? Go make a new forum called "Bad times", people can post all the shitty times that happen and people can spam the PC+1 "that sucks" crap all day.

The reason Dino's thread was popular wasn't because it was well thought out, it was the douchebaggery that followed. You had dozens of morons shouting in whitegate trying to get their rocks off by harassing some tard thief. Congrats, a group of players made an idiot look like an idiot all the while showing they're just as much an idiot. This is your improved QCDN? Yah, that sure sounds like an improvement to me...

Then what is entertainment in your eyes? Being able to post random pictures that mean nothing to a thread? Derailing it into a conversation about the weather? I don't exactly see your side of this. I cannot empathize with your side. We could rename this forum to "Bad Times" because well...isn't that how flames start? Something bad happens and people flame a user? Everything you say seems to either back up what I've been saying, or just makes you look a little less intelligent.
 
Then what is entertainment in your eyes? Being able to post random pictures that mean nothing to a thread? Derailing it into a conversation about the weather? I don't exactly see your side of this. I cannot empathize with your side. We could rename this forum to "Bad Times" because well...isn't that how flames start? Something bad happens and people flame a user? Everything you say seems to either back up what I've been saying, or just makes you look a little less intelligent.

You're acting like the FB has improved and it obviously hasn't. All you've managed to do is clean up PC+1 which really wasn't a huge issue UNTIL people started fucking moderating the FB and I don't think it's coincidental either. You're trying to class up the flameboard and expect/want people to write flames like they're Harvard Grad's Dissertation when really, it's just a FB that needs no cleaning up. What you're constantly doing is equivalent to classing up a porn shop hidden off a damp, poorly lit back alley. Leave that shit be and stop meddling.
 
You're acting like the FB has improved and it obviously hasn't. All you've managed to do is clean up PC+1 which really wasn't a huge issue UNTIL people started fucking moderating the FB and I don't think it's coincidental either. You're trying to class up the flameboard and expect/want people to write flames like they're Harvard Grad's Dissertation when really, it's just a FB that needs no cleaning up. What you're constantly doing is equivalent to classing up a porn shop hidden off a damp, poorly lit back alley. Leave that shit be and stop meddling.

Hey, I'm not meddling anymore, and it's obvious that it's not just me with the sentiments. If you actually go back and read over the reasons as to why the PC+1s are deleted, you'll see that it's not to class up the board, but more to keep a flame easily followable.

So you are another person who is against the deletion of PC+1s, so I ask you...what would having the PC+1s staying on the board mean? How would it benefit this board? What are some good reasons to change the rule? I haven't seen any decent argument that says why the rule should be changed other then cause you want it to.
 
Hey, I'm not meddling anymore, and it's obvious that it's not just me with the sentiments. If you actually go back and read over the reasons as to why the PC+1s are deleted, you'll see that it's not to class up the board, but more to keep a flame easily followable.

So you are another person who is against the deletion of PC+1s, so I ask you...what would having the PC+1s staying on the board mean? How would it benefit this board? What are some good reasons to change the rule? I haven't seen any decent argument that says why the rule should be changed other then cause you want it to.

God, you're not following at all. PC+1 wasn't an issue to begin with UNTIL moderators starting working over the FB. I have no issue with reprimanding people who PC+1, but this is not about PC+1. This is about the constant locking, deletion and editing of topics when they branch from the OP. Forums are nothing more than conversation between masses of people and to not expect a topic to branch into other topics that either parallel or relate in one way or another is damn stupid.

Here is the quality of moderation that lead to this discussion:
1. Meastoso creates a flame to shoot off his mouth about duping and call everyone else out.

2. Responses ensue, arguements, etc. The normal mumbo-jumbo.

3. Someone responds, "duping doesn't hurt anyone since it only creates duplicates of ra/ex items in salvage."

4. A debate ensues about the REAL implications of duping and how it endeed does impact other players. Arguments are formed, backed up with legitimate reasoning and REAL evidence.

5. Shitty mod deletes it because it doesn't contain enough to entertain him.

Quality. And not so ironically, this discussion has ABSOLUTELY no relevance to the OP and yet it continues entirely based on the random whims of poor moderation. In fact, deleting the previous so-called derailment which had some relevance and allowing this one to continue further is a testiment to that shitty moderation.
 
So you are another person who is against the deletion of PC+1s

I wasn't implying the FB should be unmoderated, and i said clearly that i thought it was better now that the "PC+1's" were being removed. However, it's not just the PC+1s that are being deleted it was 3 pages worth of posts in this thread (lol10posts/page w/e) and the majority of them were not random pictures or /grabs popcorn, sure some were useless but not all.

Maybe there should be a more clear definition of what a "PC+1" really is, or am i going to get quoted the same section of the rules for a 4th time when it doesn't apply?

And by that, i mean there's been 1 reply to the OP since January the 31st.

Miros says i should try to offer solutions? I'll be honest i don't know any, but i'll throw some ideas out.

If in threads like this the deleted posts contain more than "/grabs popcorn" or "InB4yourmother" break them into another thread.

How about editing the title, so people can know what to expect before reading, "Hi - pages 1-17, FB rule discussion - pages 17-"

Both just ideas, maybe bad ideas i don't know, you tell me.
 
God, you're not following at all. PC+1 wasn't an issue to begin with UNTIL moderators starting working over the FB. I have no issue with reprimanding people who PC+1, but this is not about PC+1. This is about the constant locking, deletion and editing of topics when they branch from the OP. Forums are nothing more than conversation between masses of people and to not expect a topic to branch into other topics that either parallel or relate in one way or another is damn stupid.

I see you didn't read my post on how to speak to other people when you are trying to get your point across...

We keep jumping from topic to topic. Let's stick to PC+1. In my opinion, as well as others too, PC+1 does not add anything to this board and took away from the actual debate. The flame does not hurt by having these taken out. There were certain offenders that constantly came into a topic and posted the PC+1 junk and it did get old to many users. And because of the PMs, reports, and whatnot, that was when Dino and I sat down and said things have got to change. And then they did, and now we have most of those people who were the offenders of the PC+1 upset because they cannot do that anymore.

Moving on to the locks, some threads deserve to be locked. When the flame is extinguished, there's no point to have it around because people tend to just post some more PC+1 and go off on their own conversation. I know Jyak has done it a few times where he'll see someone he knows and all of the sudden those two will have a 5 page discussion about something in game that has no relevance. This also touches on the deletion of posts. If it's a 5 page hello fest that has no relevance to anyone other then the two involved, they should be deleted and it should be recommended that the two take the conversation to VMs.

I don't think it is too hard to ask of people who are at least intelligent enough to turn on a computer, log on, and head to this website to follow some basic rules of keeping most flames on topic. It's not difficult. QCDN by far has some of the most lenient rules of any other forum I've seen out there. Sadly, when you offer an inch people tend to take a foot. And when you zing it down to an inch a lot of people get upset.

Also, before you tell me that I'm not getting it again and that the controversy started only after we started modding the flameboard, I just have to say again that is not true. We did have gripes in the back from users about threads and whatnot. It's why we did what we did.

Here is the quality of moderation that lead to this discussion:

Good, an example. Okay let's go for it.

1. Meastoso creates a flame to shoot off his mouth about duping and call everyone else out.

Pretty basic. Most flames have to start off with something. He presented his side, shared his experience and left it at that.

2. Responses ensue, arguements, etc. The normal mumbo-jumbo.

The debating aspect. Usually what makes a great flame. Not the pictures or "inb4lulz" comments. Sometimes great points are lost in the PC+1s and that's always a shame.

3. Someone responds, "duping doesn't hurt anyone since it only creates duplicates of ra/ex items in salvage."

Not a PC+1, and has relevant to the topic. If I were a mod I'd probably wait to see how it panned out.

4. A debate ensues about the REAL implications of duping and how it endeed does impact other players. Arguments are formed, backed up with legitimate reasoning and REAL evidence.

At this point, I'd probably have to split the post (like Arc did with Anttaru) and allow this whole debate to go on in another thread since it touches on all the people who duped instead of just Meast.

5. Shitty mod deletes it because it doesn't contain enough to entertain him.

Splitting would have been better in my opinion, but calling them out in a post like this is in poor taste. Did you think of maybe PMing them and requesting the posts be restored and moved to a new thread? If the answer is no then I don't think it's really the best idea to call a mod shitty and say the reason it was deleted was because it doesn't entertain him. I did give them Tim's number and I'm sure they'll be using him in the future sometime soon...

Quality. And not so ironically, this discussion has ABSOLUTELY no relevance to the OP and yet it continues entirely based on the random whims of poor moderation. In fact, deleting the previous so-called derailment which had some relevance and allowing this one to continue further is a testiment to that shitty moderation.

Well, once again, this topic should be broken up and moved to another thread. Either in SAF or here if you want to continue to call me an idiot or the mods shitty. >.o But I ask you then...did you report one of these posts and say "Hey, I think the posts on this topic should be split off!" at all? Once again, if the answer is no, then I wouldn't call the moderation shitty since you also have an obligation to report (as do all the users) items like this. The mods are human and have lives outside of here and if you expect them to have everything done with the blink of an eye without any help from users, then shame on you.
 
I wasn't implying the FB should be unmoderated, and i said clearly that i thought it was better now that the "PC+1's" were being removed. However, it's not just the PC+1s that are being deleted it was 3 pages worth of posts in this thread (lol10posts/page w/e) and the majority of them were not random pictures or /grabs popcorn, sure some were useless but not all.

Maybe there should be a more clear definition of what a "PC+1" really is, or am i going to get quoted the same section of the rules for a 4th time when it doesn't apply?

And by that, i mean there's been 1 reply to the OP since January the 31st.

Miros says i should try to offer solutions? I'll be honest i don't know any, but i'll throw some ideas out.

If in threads like this the deleted posts contain more than "/grabs popcorn" or "InB4yourmother" break them into another thread.

How about editing the title, so people can know what to expect before reading, "Hi - pages 1-17, FB rule discussion - pages 17-"

Both just ideas, maybe bad ideas i don't know, you tell me.

Well I think I touched this in my response to Lavi. If you believe the 3 pages of relevant information was something that could have continued you could always PM or even make an SAF post requesting they be restored in a new thread. Actually after re-reading the post you made that as a suggestion.

So at this point what I'd recommend is to PM one of them and request exactly what you said here. That or bring up a SAF post.
 
God, you're not following at all. PC+1 wasn't an issue to begin with UNTIL moderators starting working over the FB.
Bullshit.
Thread: [Real Life} I hate it so much this is crap
Here's a bunch of PC+1 posts. Or just go read the thread yourself, I probably missed one or two.
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=8313&postcount=6
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=8314&postcount=7
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=8315&postcount=8
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=8611&postcount=24 (oh look! Hiii sculli!)
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=8875&postcount=28
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=9917&postcount=29
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=9940&postcount=30
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=10348&postcount=40
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=10397&postcount=41
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showpost.php?p=10594&postcount=43

Thread: Hell YEAH PUT A WANTED SIG ON ME
The whole fucking thread. Had it been posted under the current moderation it'd be gone within an hour, as it should have been because it was a pointless PC+1fest.

Thread: Sculli is retarded
The whole thread, again. OH MAN REMEMBER THE GOOD OLD DAYS WHEN PC+1 WASN'T A PROBLEM?
Only difference is back then, when someone called out someone from the staff, they got a ban for it. IT WAS SO AWESOME BACK THEN OMG

Thread: On Nazism, the KKK, and Peta (Mostly just Nazism)
Would have either been locked or moved to RSI, but look how it just sat there. Hell, had it been moved it probably would have gotten some sort of discussion going instead of devolving into PC+1 not even halfway through the first page.

Now then, these were unearthed by clicking the "Last" button and searching amongst threads back there. But let's jump forward a year or two. I implore you to look at these threads and see just how free of PC+1 they are.

Thread: Noobs please die
It's just like you said, really. A flameboard thread doesn't need to be well-written to be good. Obviously.

Thread: Blakmagik you piece of shit, get off my nuts
The thread may have had a point, but it was soon muddled by posts about Canada. Oh man, what a great read, seeing a flame turn into useless banter.

Oh, but that's just Vang right? He never made good topics anyway.
Thread: If you dont have AT LEAST 2 hours...
Even though the presentation was shoddy, the entire thread went without a hitch even if some idiots posted and got some PC+1s in between, which should've been cleaned out as they added nothing to the discussion.

Thread: I F*CKING HATE COCKROACHES (M) >< ><
Flameboard material :v

I'm getting bored. Bye-bye.
 
I read a few of the posts through as I split off the topic and the only one I really want to reply to is from Audino.

Liaison is established so as to minimize the need for the "perfect" moderator. Example? I really don't see anything wrong with Makelith, but Lavi is bleeding out every orifice possible. So far as I know, Makelith is one of the most upstanding people on the site and increases the value content in every thread where PC +1 become PC -1. My point is, not everyone will agree on the appointments to these positions. I can say that Makelith and I are the ones responsible for the appointments (at my nomination). Only time will tell if they work well enough to keep -- but so far there have been no problems.

Other than that, some people made some good posts... some people are paranoid... others yet are from a different perspective (the nice way of saying I disagree). Why the hell this carried on from Meastoso's thread is beyond me.
 
I still think the posts deleted, at least some of them were relevant to the flame, but obviously it's upto you not me. The Imp.ingots you mention were only an example of bigger point relating to the reason he was banned.

As far as the deleted flame deserving to be deleted, i don't agree at all, but that is a discussion for another time.

Lol. You are so broken its sad.

Are you guys seriously bitching about..

how the flameboard is moderated?

The flameboard is a section of this site
for ppl to all gather and talk shit.

No offense to u Lavi, I dont want trouble but
Are you guys that lonely/bored?

I can understand BW, but you lavi?
I know for a fact you have much other
things to do than troll the fb.

"Oh please Mr. Mod. stop locking my threads..
and deleting my l337 posts!
I really enjoy talking shit.."

Get over it. Its the FB.
 
Are you guys seriously bitching about how the flameboard is moderated?

Its a monthly cycle.

No offense to u Lavi,
Eh, Lavi doesn't give a shit about anyone unless the person is a yes-person. That means Lavi doesn't give a shit about you. Don't give a shit about Lavi.

I can understand BW, but you lavi?
I know for a fact you have much other things to do than troll the fb.
I dunno...

"Oh please Mr. Mod. stop locking my threads... and deleting my l337 posts! I really enjoy talking shit.."

Get over it. Its the FB.
It is the FB, but you took the time to post so unless you consider your time worthless...
 
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showthread.php?t=67650

Spoiler:
First of all i know i am doing a little bit of this...

026.gif


but this... lately is bullshit 12/16 of the visible threads on the flameboard locked for little to no reason.

flame-1.jpg


And unless you guys allow more of this to go on....

032.gif


We may end up with more of this

039.gif


It seems as if you guys feel that you have to lock the threads when the flame is "over" but if the flame were in fact over wouldnt people just stop posting and the flame would die of ... old age?

flame2.jpg


Look at this page from how flames used to die in the past... 1 thread locked and because it was a necro of over a year. (not to mention that beyond that the thread was technically a personal threat)

Why cant the moderators just keep their damn hands off the buttons and let the board live... that is really all i want for Christmas. :rant:

I think i have said my peace in the past but I still believe that an unmoderated board is the only way to fix the problem and if you look at the responses in the thread that i made which was in the correct place for a constructive argument most of the posters were on my side except for the people who are current or former staff...

Glad to see that your attempt to lock less threads is going well.

arc if you get a chance i would like to talk to you in vent if that is possible ill do you have the ability to use vent?
 
I think i have said my peace in the past but I still believe that an unmoderated board is the only way to fix the problem

If this board were unmoderated, this thread wouldn't exist - the content would still be part of meastoso's thread. This discussion had been going on over the course of the last 3 days. Why didn't you respond before then? Its seems like you didn't know the conversation was taking place, but when Arc split this derail off and put an appropriate title on it, you looked at it. That is part of why moderation exists, so that people can look at the stuff that interests them and stay away from the stuff that doesn't.
 
Ok....

80% of the posters that lives on the flameboard specifically is now whining that after many gripes and complaints from the rest of the community about the dire state of this board and how it reflects on the rest of the forums there is stricter moderation.
I for one am very happy the FB has some more moderation, because there is not much that makes me facepalm and makes me reevaluate mankind's IQ more then lots of the topics made here.
I moderate a Dutch forum filled with 10 to 16 year olds, and they act more mature then some of you people here...
 
If this board were unmoderated, this thread wouldn't exist - the content would still be part of meastoso's thread. This discussion had been going on over the course of the last 3 days. Why didn't you respond before then? Its seems like you didn't know the conversation was taking place, but when Arc split this derail off and put an appropriate title on it, you looked at it. That is part of why moderation exists, so that people can look at the stuff that interests them and stay away from the stuff that doesn't.

Incorrect actually i have been reading that thread periodically but i had taken the stance of my opinion on the subject is already known and it is unnecessary for me to cloud another thread with the discussion... However now that it has warranted its own thread i felt that it would be a good time to make a simple thread showing how we have posted in S&F forum in the past like was suggested by the moderation staff and nothing came from it.
 
er i didnt make a thread i made a post...
 
Incorrect actually i have been reading that thread periodically but i had taken the stance of my opinion on the subject is already known and it is unnecessary for me to cloud another thread with the discussion... However now that it has warranted its own thread i felt that it would be a good time to make a simple thread showing how we have posted in S&F forum in the past like was suggested by the moderation staff and nothing came from it.

But once again you only gave your opinion. There was nothing in your posts that actually backed up your opinion, only pot shots at the mod team and that's really it.
 
Ok....

80% of the posters that lives on the flameboard specifically is now whining that after many gripes and complaints from the rest of the community about the dire state of this board and how it reflects on the rest of the forums there is stricter moderation.
I for one am very happy the FB has some more moderation, because there is not much that makes me facepalm and makes me reevaluate mankind's IQ more then lots of the topics made here.
I moderate a Dutch forum filled with 10 to 16 year olds, and they act more mature then some of you people here...


Couldn't agree more.

I <3 deja and have nothing but nice things to say
about him and some others but its insulting
to suggest the flameboard "needs to be treated better".


This is a place where ppl come to be entertained
and "LOL". Some ppl use this as a place to just
talk shit and be stupid and tear ppl down etc.

These same ppl who post x100 times in all these
threads x1000, throwing random insults and
derailing flames are the same ppl BEGGING
for ppl get banned and the FB to essentially be
more... "user friendly for trolls".


Quit bitchin. Theres plenty of sites for you
troll,flame and show how angry and sad
you are by wasting AN ENTIRE day on FBs.


If you don't like the way a site is managed or
handled, there are plenty of forums more user
friendly for you to flame.


This section doesn't add ANYTHING positive to
QCDN let alone quetz or ffxi in general.

As crazy as it might sound, Mods have better
things to do than care about than flames.
 
http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showthread.php?t=67650

Spoiler:


I think i have said my peace in the past but I still believe that an unmoderated board is the only way to fix the problem and if you look at the responses in the thread that i made which was in the correct place for a constructive argument most of the posters were on my side except for the people who are current or former staff...

Glad to see that your attempt to lock less threads is going well.

arc if you get a chance i would like to talk to you in vent if that is possible ill do you have the ability to use vent?

And again, I bring up the point that if they're going to die anyway, what's the harm in locking them? If the issue is dealt with, and it's basically over, why not lock it, if it's just going to die anyway? At the very least, it'd prevent necro'ing.

From another perspective, if you had a thread about something like AV strategies, and there was a 3 page interlude about Chocobo Racing, the thread would (and should) be moderated in a fashion to either remove the irrelevant posts, or make them their own thread. Works in a similar fashion in the FB. Really don't see how or why this is even an issue.

Seriously, can someone please present their arguments about this in a clear fashion that explains and supports their initial arguments? So far, the only actual argument I've seen against the current moderating in the FB that isn't just random thoughts put together in a disorderly fashion is Dejavu, whose entire argument and support is "no moderation ftw!" and that's about it.
 
Back
Top